Delusions of Grandeur and Miscellaneous Prats and Racists26 Oct 2007 12:32 pm
By Nelson

Thanks to Lauren for finding this first post in the debate about vaccination against cervical cancer. It inspired me to go and look myself and then I found the others. Jesus.

I’m all for saving lives , but this is about a sexually transmitted virus and I suppose that when the school nurse gives the 12 yr olds their ‘morning after pills’, free condoms and their books on ’sex education’ , she can also tell them about the army of pederasts waiting outside the schools, rubbing their hands with glee at the state-sponsored sexualisation of schoolchildren.
Arthur Smedley, Carshalton Beeches,Surrey, United Kingdom

I too am in favour of saving lives but not if it means embarrassing some old men by talking about a lady’s special flower. It’s probably best if we just tie knots in their cocks and sew their fannies up.

Seems like a tacit admission that underage sex takes place and is to be an accepted part of Life.

Otherwise the vaccine would be administered at 15 going on 16.

Don’t get me wrong, it is good to see money spent on ourselves rather than housing for whoever manages to hitch a ride in a lorry etc., but I cannot get the idea out of my head that underage sex is expected of girls.
Lord Zakspade of Elbonia, Bucks, United Kingdom

Can’t get it out of your head eh? You know what that means don’t you? It means you’re a great big greasy paedo.

My concern is that cervical cancer rates might go up rather than down. The jab reduces but does not elimate the risk of cervical cancer. Women will still need to have regular smear tests.
It is possible that the next generation of adult females will neglect having smear tests and then the proportion of cervical cancer will actually rise as there are less smear tests.

Don’t say I didn’t warn you…

[GPforhire], Calverley, United Kingdom

I don’t give a dizzy fuck what your concerns are. You pompous twat. I bet you wear a pinstriped suit. You ridiculous little man.

9 Responses to “Terrifying Mimsy”

  1. on 26 Oct 2007 at 1:08 pm Alex

    Fucksake, people in this country are so totally full of stinking turd!

  2. on 26 Oct 2007 at 1:36 pm gazzag

    The trouble with these little scrubbers is that they just don’t want to not catch cancer.

  3. on 26 Oct 2007 at 2:36 pm Karen

    You know, as soon as I saw this was a debate on HYS I hopped on over here to see what choice gems you had found.

    Every day I lose just a little bit more faith in humanity.

  4. on 26 Oct 2007 at 3:11 pm zym

    Fair play to Lord Zakspade for managing to shoe-horn immigration into a discussion about cervical cancer!

  5. on 26 Oct 2007 at 3:22 pm Jonn

    Personally I think underaged sex should be compulsory.

    I’m sick of this wishy washy government doing everything by half measures.

  6. on 26 Oct 2007 at 3:29 pm Nicky

    I think the vaccination is given to 11 and 12yos because it’s more effective if done before puber….

    Ah fuck. You tricked me into talking to them again.

  7. on 26 Oct 2007 at 7:37 pm Mo

    The mind boggles.

  8. on 26 Oct 2007 at 8:31 pm domino

    [pedant] pederasts is “A man who has sexual relations, especially anal intercourse, with a boy.” How the fuck is this going to be a problem for girls who might get cervical cancer? EH??? [/pedant]

  9. on 09 Nov 2007 at 8:55 am Dazzla

    “Seems like a tacit admission that underage sex takes place.”

    Here’s an explicit one: It does I hardly know anyone who was below the age of 16 when they lost their virginity.

    “and is to be an accepted part of Life.”

    Pfft.