Comments on: Fundies

By: James

James — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:33:42 +0000

Thermodynamics = The movement of energy and how energy creates movement (i.e. twatting an evangelical tit with a sledgehammer and the distance they move is based on how pissed off you were when you swung the hammer)

Evolution = Random mutations appearing in a species. Then add in something that kills off those that don’t have what it takes to survive and hey, evoluton. Darwin put it a lot better but I ain’t Darwin.

Thermodynamics has very little to do with evolution. If it did then sad evangelical twats would have developed the fireproof heretic and witch during the old burning at a stake form of rehabilitation.

By: VW

VW — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:39:07 +0000

I get it – according to the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics then, atmospheric H2O CANNOT turn into snowflakes, as snowflakes are clearly more ordered than vapour.

Anybody who claims that snowflakes are real is clearly in league with the devil.

By: news blonde

news blonde — Mon, 05 May 2008 20:54:47 +0000

releases news news soul

By: Nelson

Nelson — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:24:39 +0000

I had to look up “Ouroboros”. It created such a compelling image that I nearly tried it.

By: Cag

Cag — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:39:24 +0000

Hang on, so it’s ill-researched, misapprehended AND lazy? Sort of hand-me-down, thrift store laziness?

Righto.

Sounds like a nice trick you can do, though. Must look a lot like the Ouroboros, only less snakey. More pink and wobbly and hairy and with your cock in your mouth.

By: Nelson

Nelson — Sat, 02 Feb 2008 12:08:27 +0000

Nope. This is from another site that collects stupid comments. There’s a link in the original post. Perhaps you should get over there and ask them some probing questions about their methods?

I’m only bothering to reply because I am sat on the bog with my laptop right now and I have only two things to do. One of them I can do with no hands.

By: Cag

Cag — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:09:03 +0000

Seem pretty clear from the phraseology that this is a sarcastic attack on one of the standard creationist counters to evolutionary theory. A pisstake, as you put it. No mind bending required, this is irony pure and simple. Are you telling us, Nelson, that you found plenty under this moniker consistant with the opposite interpretation?

By: fub

fub — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:11:21 +0000

Thank you for providing me with a near death experience.
Fortunately i was able to laugh the piece of biscuit free from my windpipe, having suffered only minor brain damage, which may or may not have been previously present, there may also be some loss of short term memory, though that may be due to something else.

Please consider posting a disclaimer somewhere on the site highlighting the dangers inherent in reading this material.

By: Loubie

Loubie — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:41:49 +0000

The second law of thermodynamics is DON’T TALK ABOUT THERMODYNAMICS

By: DarthVodka

DarthVodka — Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:31:54 +0000

“This states that as time goes by, entropy in an environment will increase”

yes, but it caveats that with it being an isolated system

now just to find that elusive energy source, eh?

“Evolution says that we started out simple, and over time became more complex. That just isn’t possible”

er, yes it is. and that’s the watch-maker argument

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchmaker_analogy