Comments on: Child Benefit Paedo Terror

By: GREG COOK

GREG COOK — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 01:17:53 +0000

I think Mr. Boz Scaggs put it most succinctly when he sang the achingly relevant ‘chanson de nos jours’, Paedo, Woh oh oh oh.

By: Charlotter

Charlotter — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:31:49 +0000

You know what, before i thought about it properly i assumed GB was Great Britain. Then i realised, actually maybe its Gordon Brown. Great Britain fits much more nicely in my imagination though.

By: sir jon dangerous

sir jon dangerous — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:44:03 +0000

Louise, far more children are paedophised by people related or known to them than by strangers, so if your child is fiddled with, I shall hold you PERSONALLY, yes PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE for being related to or friends with her attacker. You arsebiscuit.

By: awesom-o-4000

awesom-o-4000 — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:48:20 +0000

Hmm. I’m sure that Inland Revenue keeps carefully updated photographs of all children with their tax records…

Anyway, Loiuse’s children will be easy to spot - they’ll be the ones wearing tinfoil hats with a look of indocrinated terror on their faces while traipsing around Safeway behind their mum.

That and the fact that they’re probably both in their late thirties by now but still live with their parents because it’s too dangerous to speak to any estate agents, who are probably all paedos.

Well, in fairness, they probably are.

By: no, it isn't

no, it isn't — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:00:36 +0000

first things first man you’re fucking with the worst i’ll be stickin pins in your head like a motherfucking nurse

By: Bev

Bev — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:38:03 +0000

Why is she worried about those peedoze when she clearly rates her bank of higher importance than her daughter? Surely it’s those pesky bank robbers she should be vomiting words about.

By: El Hutcho

El Hutcho — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:37:12 +0000

Think Louise is a bit harsh blaming the whole of Great Britain responsible. Or have I got the wrong end of the stick again (it might be down to her appalling lack of grammar, spelling and basic sentence construction)?

By: La Smoggette

La Smoggette — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:30:57 +0000

Louise, I’m actually disgusted at your shambolic parenting efforts.

We have 9 daughters and have not given any of them a name, for fear of the paedophiles using it in their sick attempts to see their fou-fous.

Yes, the confusion led to rather muted christenings and an inability to procure either employment or passports, BUT AT LEAST I HAVE NO FEAR OF LOST DISCS!

GB: lose what you like, my girls are *safe*.

By: Oliver

Oliver — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:29:18 +0000

I have decided to hold Louise personally responsible for anything I dont like. I have her name, I know she lives in Surrey, how hard can it be?

As soon as I find a Louise i’m going to panel her for being woken at 3.00 am by someone digging up the road last night.

By: fucko the clown

fucko the clown — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:28:51 +0000

Louise, I have it on good authority, that the Paedo institute of easy access, is developing a device for reading brain waves, so if you even think about your childs name, they can instantly know where and how to get at her. worringly the seem to have sold it to some muslim terrorists too.

I think GB would be very upset to learn you hold him personally responsible, and as for you being had, I do hope he polished your downstairs before he had you.