Moderation Martyrs and Racists24 Jun 2008 10:32 am
By Alex

Can anyone explain what this strange man‘s opinion on the use of “rape” as a “weapon” of “war” actually “is”, or why he didn’t put “wives” in “inverted commas” too?

Whislt we all abhorr rape it’s completely ridiculous to classify rape as a tactic in “war”. The only groups that have demonstrated use of women as a tactic in “war” have been terrorists, supported by their wives.
[iceagecometh]

Answers on a “postcard” to:
spEak You’re bRanes
P.O. Box 1523
Londonistan W12 6LA
Cloud Cuckoo Land

This comment has nothing to do with this news item. I object to the vast number of my “have yoursay” comments that are still “awaiting moderation”.
[iceagecometh]

They’re trying to achieve “balance”. They can only publish yours when they get one from Gandhi, Jesus or Obi-wan Kenobi to balance it out.

The solution is simple, extend our immigration laws to include and ensure deportation of every illegal immigrant and the immediate family of any non-indigenous parent who has produced the home-grown terrorrists. The costs of treatment will always grossly exceed the costs of treatment.
[iceagecometh]

And don’t forget, if you really want to get the best out of your terrorists, pinch them out to encourage bushing. Once they begin to flower, start feeding them with a formulated terrorist-feed. If you water them frequently and keep them free from slugs, there’s no reason why you shouldn’t continue to enjoy homegrown terrorists until September.

24 Responses to “Whatever It Is, It Must Be Terrorists”

  1. on 24 Jun 2008 at 10:43 am Rich (MMath)(Oxon)

    “The costs of treatment will always grossly exceed the costs of treatment.”

    My degree in math(s) suggests to me that there is something wrong with this sentence.

  2. on 24 Jun 2008 at 10:46 am Alex

    To his credit, that is a dazzlingly simple solution.

  3. on 24 Jun 2008 at 10:53 am Paul D. Waite

    > The solution is simple

    Pay attention, you know this will be good.

    > extend our immigration laws to include and ensure deportation of every illegal immigrant

    That’s the problem with our immigration laws. They just don’t cover illegal immigrants.

  4. on 24 Jun 2008 at 10:55 am Mr Cat

    Its very rare that someone from HYS genuinely makes me angry… depressed, yes, amused, yes, depsairing, yes … but over time I’ve become numb to the squeakings of the right wing belligerents and realised that many of them will probably be dead soon anyway.

    Then someone like this comes along and I feel such rage that my vision blurs and I have to go for a little walk to calm myself down.

    If anyone needed any more convincing that the “b”bc is out of control

    - it’s relentless reporting of global warming despite the fact that throughout it’s reporting, the globe was cooling;

    - it’s now current relentless reporting of zimbabwean issues;

    Does the “b”bc represent majority view? No, otherwise it would place more scrutiny on the abuse of democracy by unelected EU representatives than it’s current obsession with Africa.

    He is truly scum…

  5. on 24 Jun 2008 at 10:56 am Rodafowa

    I think he’s missing a trick here. The law is already pretty good at deporting illegal immigrants, but it’s shockingly ineffective when it comes to deporting legal immigrants.

  6. on 24 Jun 2008 at 11:04 am Bifidus Digestivum

    Wow. He really is quite unhinged. I like this offering:

    ‘Can Barac Obama win the US presidential election?’

    “This issue is irrelevant. What’s more important is that the bbc moderator decided not publish this comment: It’s not that long ago when a decent woman wouldn’t visit a pub. Now they’re virtually dancing on the bar. Many who now prefer to be called “girls”, are the mother’s of our irresponsible children.”

    Stop press. Hold the front page. Wake up the fucking President: A BBC moderator has decided not to publish a misogynist cretin’s feeble thoughts.

    And to think I was worrying about who would be the next President of the United States of America. When stuff like this happens it really puts all the little things in perspective.

  7. on 24 Jun 2008 at 11:59 am Graham

    From “Are free elections in Zimbabwe impossible?”

    Mugabwe’s only mistake is that he wasn’t clever enough to gain EU Membership, then he would be allowed to abuse democracy forever.

    What a total, utter, fucking bell-end.

  8. on 24 Jun 2008 at 12:07 pm Simon

    The costs of treatment will always grossly exceed the costs of treatment.
    ============================
    Rich MMath Oxon – we all know that they give away degrees these days. By the way, is the air condiitioning in the office today grossly exceeding the air conditioning in the office today?

    Graham – that is a spectacular comment! what are they thinking when they form these comments?

  9. on 24 Jun 2008 at 12:15 pm Katie (BSc Media Studies, Stafford Poly.)

    “The costs of treatment will always grossly exceed the costs of treatment.”

    I do actually wonder what he was trying to say here. Did he mean it would be cheaper to deport everyone than to deal with the consequences of not deporting them (you know, things smelling faintly of curry)?

    Is that even *slightly* not bollocks?

  10. on 24 Jun 2008 at 12:28 pm DW

    American troops that served in Vietnam and a few in Iraq must be terrorists as they have raped alot of women.

    I hope this dude gets raped, looking at some of his other comments he seems the sort who once took a piss next to a black man and noticed the black man had am uch larger penis then his own and then decided to hate all coloured folk…

  11. on 24 Jun 2008 at 12:28 pm Oliver

    Oh yes, we all abhor rape don’t we – nudge nudge, wink wink.

    Even a mindcrushing bigot like Iceage is bright enough to know that you dont say things like ‘rape is just assault with a friendly weapon’.

    Well, not when the memsahibs might be listening anyhow.

    Whattacunt.

  12. on 24 Jun 2008 at 12:33 pm James not from Sussex

    You may not like his politics, but his logic’s impeccable:

    If there has been an increase in lap-dancing clubs, that’s probably a result of ongoing feminism. Naturally the explosion of women attending male stripper clubs is conveniently ignored.

  13. on 24 Jun 2008 at 12:50 pm Rich(MMath)(Oxon)

    The explosion of women attending male stripper clubs?

    Sounds dangerous.

  14. on 24 Jun 2008 at 1:14 pm noshitsherlcok

    I went in one of them male strip clubs the once – jam packed with terrorist wives exploding it was

  15. on 24 Jun 2008 at 2:24 pm The Go-nutteer

    I agree with Mr Cat. There should be no apostrophe in “its”. What a complete and utter cunt.

  16. on 24 Jun 2008 at 2:59 pm burnel

    The loon is in need of an intimate conversation with a nail gun.

  17. on 24 Jun 2008 at 4:10 pm James from not Sussex

    More impeccable logic here:

    The solution to road congestion that would also reduce traffic pollution and road safety problems is simple. Apply an appropriate tax to all those who have two cars, or more.

    Yes, this is a perfect solution to congestion, because individuals who own two cars do tend to drive them both at the same time.

  18. on 24 Jun 2008 at 4:24 pm Simon

    iceagecometh’s response to “How can we tackle knife crime?” was this little beaut:
    >>The solution is simple, expect better parentage.

    what does that \emph{mean}? and on the topic of cambridge english lit finalists getting a question about lyrics:
    >>They were assured their “degree” when they were allowed to enroll.
    Their time would be better spent understanding darwinism and the
    fact that they’re only apes.

    because cambridge is a cake-walk. anyway how many cambridge graduates does he suppose are unaware that they are apes?

  19. on 24 Jun 2008 at 4:51 pm James from not Sussex

    Looking at his other posts, I get the sinking feeling that “better parentage” means “keep the women barefoot and pregnant” as he seems to be against single mothers, working mothers, voting mothers or speaking mothers.

  20. on 24 Jun 2008 at 5:30 pm The Go-nutteer (MA Cantab) (BAGA 1)

    I’d like to suggest a way in which iceagecometh’s time would be better spent, but sadly I suspect there isn’t one.

  21. on 24 Jun 2008 at 5:51 pm James not from Sussex (Borstal) (GCSE [Metalwork {Ungraded}])

    Better he do this than use his faulty brain to fuck up, say, driving a bus. At least on HYS he can’t actively kill anyone.

  22. on 25 Jun 2008 at 10:47 am Peter

    Another gem.

    Suggest africans become responsible for themselves rather than continuing to cry for aid.

    I genuinely do not know where to begin.

  23. on 26 Jun 2008 at 8:58 am Katie (GCSE IT)

    It’s become a british disease to accept the waste of tax-payer’s money in addressing treatment of the consequences of home-grown terrorism and benefit abuse rather than first applying surgery to the sources. [iceagecometh]

    Yeeeeaaaahhhhhh…

    I love how he equates terrorism and benefit abuse, somehow implies a link between the two, and then stretches his appalling ‘disease’ metaphor just that little bit too far, implying surgery is the answer to extremism (and dole dossers, which is the same thing now).

    Well I don’t know, maybe it is. If we round up everyone who looks like they’re going to become a terrorist/benefit abuser, you know, anyone who’s shifty-looking or a bit brown, and then cut off their nads, that would stop them from going on to do such things. Or maybe we can just have [iceagecometh]‘s nads off. That would probably be for the best. Every comment of his I read increases my belief that he’s actually some kind of animal’s muff.

  24. on 26 Jun 2008 at 10:21 am Rich (Mmath)(Oxon)

    Like all good donkey turds, iceagecometh has a ridiculous opinion on the Diana inquest.

    “The fact that Mohamed Al Fayed has needed a conspiracy theory only serves to substantiate that his overriding original objective was to give William a muslim brother. Unfortunately, Diana and Dodi paid for his religious obsession with their lives. “