Mark Easton wrote in his blog about how disproportionism in the media leads to hysterical fear of crime.
What’s the correct response? Hysterical fear of crime, naturally.
Responsibilities - I wish!!!
Person A is a responsible person who can be trusted with a knife (or a gun, or a child, or whatever).
Person B is an irresponsible person who cannot be trusted with a knife (or a gun, or a child, or whatever).
We are not allowed to discriminate between A and B as this would be an infringement of B’s “rights”.
Therefore, we must treat A in the same way as B and impose any amount of petty restrictions on both of them.
And B, being irresponsible, will evade the restrictions imposed to control him/her.
While A, being responsible, will try to abide by the restrictions which are not necessary for him/her.
A, being responsible, is far easier to police and prosecute than B. A will therefore be more disadvantaged by these restrictions than B.
Until we are once again allowed to DISCRIMINATE between A and B, things will go from bad to worse.
And no, it’s not really that difficult to tell the majority of the As and Bs apart . . .
AZLewes
Yes, the Bs all have little squinty eyes that are too close together while the As are all 6′ tall and blond, with proud chests that swell with the joy of living.
But that’s not it for poor long-suffering A and scumbag B…
[AZLewes] is spot on, however I would go one further as the situation is now in reality much more skewed in favour of the irresponsable person B.
The responsible person A is going about his legal business in the street and is unarmed.
A is approached by the irresponsable person B who is armed and intent on relieving A of his wallet containing his hard-earned cash. This is required to feed B’s drug habit. Person B pulls a knife.
Unfortunately for person B, A takes exception to B’s criminal behaviour and is morally obliged to decline the invitation to hand over his wallet. Being a fairly well built chap A defends himself using reasonable force and person B suffers hurt feelings and a cracked nail as he is forceably separated from the contents of his cuttlery draw.
PC Plod (person pC) arives on scene and decides for some reason that ‘a dispute’ (you can b***dy say tha again) has occured between person A and person B, whose ‘rights’ are now for some inexplicable reason equal even though person B is clearlt a knife wielding thug well known to the Police, and person A is just trying to get home from work.
A is fingerprinted, DNA tested, and charged with assault. Whilst A is held overnight in the cells, B is released without charge because “it is soceity wot dun it to ‘im innit?” and is therefore free to knock over A’s house during the small hours to rearm himself from the cuttlery draw and steal A’s property to fund his drug habit.
The law abiding person A now has a criminal record and looses his job, his house and his wife.
Well done pC, UK law and British common sense.
——–Whilst this situation is mercifully rare, it has occurred in the past and although laughable when expressed like this, it is unfortunately now a genuine concern for the law abiding.
The fact that it is rare is because most people in this situation would actually just hand over their wallet, loose £10 in cash, cancel their cards and not bother to report it (because no-one will be caught anyway and it is not worth the effort having the conversation with the administrator on the front desk of the police station, even if you can find one that is actually open) rather than risk taking a stand, or indeed help anyone else finding themselves in this position.
It is this fear of the state by the law abiding which is causing antisocial behaviour in all its forms to spiral because quite simply, the law abiding do not feel able to take action or intervene in any way lest they end up in the cells. Untill this dire situation (or the perception of this situation) is clearly reversed, crime and general disorder will only get worse.
Repealling the fatuous Human Rights Act, a European construct with no place in UK law, would be a fantastic start.
UKIntel
Check your newspeak dictionaries, citizens: “Mercifully rare” should replace the oldspeak term “Completely made up.”
