Credulous Nincompoops and Delusions of Grandeur and Moderation Martyrs10 Sep 2008 12:40 pm
By Alex

I propose a new category of “Moderation Martyrs” for [iceagecometh], whose opinions are too real for the PC “B”BC. Like the following comment on Georgia. What a shame we will never be able to read it.

So why are we denied comment? The answer is simple, political, religious and ideological abuse ordinary people and children.
[iceagecometh]

Censorship has driven him to drastic measures, like posting his opinions on a BBC Have Your Say thread on expensive cities, far from the prying PC gaze of the BBC:

Nowaday’s discrimination is a one-way path. If you’re indigenous british, male, heterosexual and athiest, you have no chance of justice, including the right to haveyoursay.
[iceagecometh]

Now I know why it’s your posts that are disappearing.

I have no doubt that the chinese people are bombarded by political propaganda, as we are by an undobtedly socialist “b”bc. So what’s the greatest abuse, internet access in china or denial rights in the UK?
[iceagecometh]

Our denial rights are not being respected. Need proof? Well, they never publish common sense commentary like this:

It’s multiculural london that’s more likely to be beyond revival. What the rest of us need is adequate immigration control, and UK legislation that doesn’t allow our judiciary to make “judgements” that gives protection to imported criminals and illegal immigrants.
[iceagecometh]

Or this:

So why is this comment awaiting “moderation”?

[... he pasted the comment above in again here ...]
[iceagecometh]

Perhaps you should flag your comments with some sort of gold star, just so they know that your latest bit of aggrieved, racist snivelling is more urgent than the other 3,932 selfish bumsquawks awaiting their attention.

Depressing stuff, so here are some rousing words to end with:

For the sake of children everywhere, let’s haveoursay.
[iceagecometh]

We’d love to, but you know quite well that we can’t.

40 Responses to “Publish Meeeeeeeeeeeeeee!”

  1. on 10 Sep 2008 at 12:45 pm Rebel

    Anyone fancy a quick chorus of The Greatest Love of All ?

    Then a vomit of course.

    Iceagecometh ? Probably not unless Nick Griffin or the bloke from MigrationWatch is speaking, then it’s all over the place.

  2. on 10 Sep 2008 at 12:49 pm Higgs Boson

    I particularly like the notion of imported criminals. Are they like ordinary criminals but brewed with extra hops for a smoother flavour?

  3. on 10 Sep 2008 at 12:58 pm AndyS

    “For the sake of children everywhere, let’s haveoursay.”

    no no no no no no no

    for the sake of children everywhere let’s knifecrime all the peedos. twice.

  4. on 10 Sep 2008 at 12:58 pm offensive_mango

    He sounds like a c0ck. PUBLISH THIS IF YOU DARE.

  5. on 10 Sep 2008 at 1:19 pm BeastUK

    indigenous british, male, heterosexual and athiest

    Wait, isn’t it supposed to be white, male, hetero Christians who are the silent majority?

    These days if you’re a white, male, paedosexual lobster chimera you’re just overlooked by the PC brigade…

  6. on 10 Sep 2008 at 1:27 pm Pablo's Bones

    This is one more example of his pig-cockery:

    “Zimbabwe, like the global-warming issue has had more coverage on here than it deserves, unless there is an bias.”

    …in a debate about the death of the Zambian president. Still, they’re both darkie countries I suppose.

  7. on 10 Sep 2008 at 1:36 pm Rebel

    Step back Stephen Hawking…..

    Dig up Isaac Newton…..

    I give you, Richard Raven:
    (about the big bang experiemnt thingybob):

    “Seemed a little spooky at first especially when the date today is 10 9 8 Regards RR”

    Richard Raven, Wrentham

    Is that why the D Day landing were at 6am on the 6th of the 6th ?

  8. on 10 Sep 2008 at 1:48 pm Bakeules

    “What the rest of us need is adequate immigration control, and UK legislation that doesn’t allow our judiciary to make “judgements” that gives protection to imported criminals and illegal immigrants.”

    Equal protection under the law? Judges judging? Whatever will the BBPC Brigade come up with next?

    Relax, I’m a moron with an internet connection who doesn’t understand the foundations of the British legal system

  9. on 10 Sep 2008 at 1:54 pm Disgustipated

    Nowaday’s discrimination is a one-way path

    Hum, correct me if I’m wrong, but hasn’t discrimination always been one-way? That’s what, y’know, makes it discriminatory.

    If you discriminate against everyone, then it’s no longer discrimination.

    Except against yourself, maybe.

    Argh, confused now. TEL ME!!??

  10. on 10 Sep 2008 at 2:10 pm alt-f4

    “So why is this comment waiting “moderation”?”

    The moderator is off having a wank. He’ll get around to deleting your comment later.

  11. on 10 Sep 2008 at 2:20 pm Far-Q

    Nah, the moderator is too busy twatting head off the keyboard in despair at the idiocy of certain sections of mankind.

    I say ‘mankind’, obviously I mean ‘Ungulates-uterous-kind’

  12. on 10 Sep 2008 at 2:26 pm Far-Q

    And I mean ‘Uterus’ as well. Lager. Train movement. Typing skills fading fast. I cannae hold it much longer caption. Capstan. Capital. BRING BACK CAPITAL PUNISHMENT I SAY!!!!! HANGINSG TWO GO0D FOR EM>

  13. on 10 Sep 2008 at 2:33 pm Rod Wrongnob

    So what’s the greatest abuse, internet access in china or denial rights in the UK?

    It’s a tough call. If you misbehave on the Internet in China, you get harassed and possibly beaten and imprisoned. If you misbehave on the Internet in “Britain”, you get ridiculed on SYB and compared to a lemur’s ladybits. Errrm, it’s China, isn’t it?

    And is “iceagecometh” a clever little dig at the global scientific consensus on climate change? wankerwankerwankerwankerwankerwanker (times infinity)

  14. on 10 Sep 2008 at 2:36 pm Rod Wrongnob

    So what’s the greatest abuse, internet access in china or denial rights in the UK?

    It’s a tough call. If you misbehave on the Internet in China, you get harassed and possibly beaten and imprisoned. If you misbehave on the Internet in “Britain”, you get ridiculed on SYB and compared to a lemur’s ladybits. Errrm, it’s China, isn’t it?

    And is “iceagecometh” a clever little dig at the global scientific consensus on climate change? Wanker.

  15. on 10 Sep 2008 at 2:37 pm Rod Wrongnob

    Bah.

  16. on 10 Sep 2008 at 3:00 pm Samwel

    RHETORICAL QUESTION: I’m not really sure what the “b”bc thing is all about. Is he suggesting that the British Broadcasting Corporation is no longer BRITISH enough for him?

    By the way, I’m indigenous British, male, heterosexual and athiest and I tried to post on Have Your Say and a judge from the judicial system came and knifecrimed me, so he isn’t far wrong.

  17. on 10 Sep 2008 at 3:19 pm kill jill

    im so stoned right now

  18. on 10 Sep 2008 at 3:20 pm kill jill

    mayeb ill go post in have your cuntcunt say

  19. on 10 Sep 2008 at 3:24 pm setyourfacestostunned

    I do not think [iceagecometh] was loved as a child.

    And when I say loved I mean by a male relative. In the bottom.

    “Spank”

  20. on 10 Sep 2008 at 3:30 pm Loztralia

    Has anyone else noticed that the “I bet this doesn’t get published” device is used by two kinds of people: aggrieved 9-year-old readers of “Shoot!” magazine who think there should be more articles about West Ham, and Have Your Say nazis. Oh, and possibly the more immature teenage Morrissey. fans writing to the NME in the early 90s. Essentially I’m saying Have Your Say people are idiots, not sure why I bothered really. I bet this doesn’t get published.

  21. on 10 Sep 2008 at 3:32 pm lisa simpson

    The answer is simple, political, religious and ideological abuse ordinary people and children.

    has anyone worked out what this comment is actually supposed to say? the grammar is appalling, it literally makes no sense! perhaps this mr indiginous could take more care over his native language? or is it writing in code so people with his brain power can understand?

    Nowaday’s discrimination is a one-way path. If you’re indigenous british, male, heterosexual and athiest, you have no chance of justice

    as has been said, it’s more normally white, male christians who claim this kind of bigotry - after all they are the ones who’ve always held the power and can’t stand to see even a tiny part of it wrested from their grubby little paws by those pesky brown/female/foreign people.

  22. on 10 Sep 2008 at 3:54 pm DC

    It’s not as if it’s even pesky brown/female/foreign people though is it. It’s other white people with differing opinions wrestling with other white people both arguing from the same hymn book.

    In comparison http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YynWKg1plu4

    Oh yes.

  23. on 10 Sep 2008 at 3:57 pm Bo

    @lisa simpson, I think he means

    The answer is simple, political, religious and ideological *figures* abuse ordinary people and children.

    Perhaps s/he haemorrhaged his brain trying to come up with another word for ‘people’ and collapsed in a heap on his return key.

    “Nghrr”

  24. on 10 Sep 2008 at 4:11 pm AndyS

    as in “the sheriff is a “Nghrr”?”

  25. on 10 Sep 2008 at 4:21 pm AndyS

    that youtube thing made my brain hurt. is it me or has she just got a little confused with the differing tenets of national socialism and socialism

    i mean, really, she doesn’t want america to turn into a nazi hellhole by electing communists?

  26. on 10 Sep 2008 at 4:47 pm Nihil Obstat

    No surely, it’s

    “The answer is simple, it’s the political, religious and ideological abuse of ordinary people and children.”

    Admittedly, that makes no more sense but at least you can read it without your brains leaking out of your ear.

  27. on 10 Sep 2008 at 4:51 pm Rich(Oxo)

    What’s with writing “haveyoursay” anyway? Is this how one is supposed to signify that they are trying to be clever and jimmy in the name of the forum they are on?

    This guy is truly speakinghisbrains.

  28. on 10 Sep 2008 at 5:05 pm Alex

    The moderator is off having a wank. He’ll get around to deleting your comment later.

    Nah, the moderator is too busy twatting head off the keyboard in despair at the idiocy of certain sections of mankind.

    Nah, the moderator is deliberating whether to publish both your post and your rant about not getting your post published, thus making you look like a paranoid, self-important shitbucket, or whether to come round your house and shit in your teapot.

    I really hope it was both.

  29. on 10 Sep 2008 at 5:06 pm Mal

    As Charlie Brooker said in Monday’s Grauniad

    Only one thing for it: we’re all going to have masturbate our way back to sanity together. Right, readers? Three … two … one … go!

  30. on 10 Sep 2008 at 7:53 pm Vicky

    No surely, it’s

    “The answer is simple, it’s the political, religious and ideological abuse of ordinary people and children.”

    The answer is even simpler, any post containing these words or a variation such as “It’s easy” or “It’s not rocket-science” is invariably a torrent of incoherent gibberish.

    It might be some kind of coding error.

  31. on 10 Sep 2008 at 10:01 pm kill jill

    spliff + have your say = insanity

    nuff maths for today

  32. on 11 Sep 2008 at 7:29 am Neil

    I note that none of his posts appear to have more than 3 recommendations at best, is he clicking his own posts?

    The great ocelot’s clitoris.

  33. on 11 Sep 2008 at 8:32 am domino

    Mal - Charlie also said:

    …it was the 9/11 of tits

    a phrase which should be used at every available opportunity.

  34. on 11 Sep 2008 at 8:57 am Dingleberry

    “There used to be a, ‘lower class’, in this country; powerless, exploited, bled dry, kicked around and despised. Now they are called, ‘English’.”
    Comeback Johnwilkes, Ingsoc

    No mate, Your Dad was ‘Lower Class’, you’re ‘Bottom of the Class’ or ‘Special Needs’ or something. It must have been tough at your inner city school watching all the immigrant kids doing algebra and physics, while you listen to the teacher’s assistant say to you in a loud voice, “Make a nice round circle like this, with a leg going down below the line, like this, what’s that? Yes! it’s a ‘P’, well done.” Now make an ‘R’, an ‘I’, a ‘C’…

  35. on 11 Sep 2008 at 12:03 pm Vicky

    is he clicking his own posts?

    On the one hand, it would take a special kind of idiot to recommend his own published comments whilst complaining that none of them get published. On the other hand, he appears to be precisely that special.

  36. on 11 Sep 2008 at 1:05 pm crafty_carmen

    Infidels don’t have souls.

    Relax, I’m a darkie.

  37. on 11 Sep 2008 at 1:07 pm crafty_carmen

    Bugger that went into themwrong topic. Bloody PC brigade, moving my mouse while I’m on lunch.

  38. on 13 Sep 2008 at 8:53 pm Gob Beldof

    ICEAGECOMETH

    I ALSO EXPERIENCE THIS KIND OF REPRESSION EVERY DAY AS A RESULT OF PEOPLE SUPPRESSING MY DEMOCRATIC RIGHT TO FLING FECAL MATTER AT DAILY MAIL READERS.

    MULTICULTURAL LONDON IS DOOMED, UNLIKE MONOCULTURAL SWANAGE. WHAT WE NEED IS MORE RIGHTS FOR PEOPLE TO POST UNFOCUSED RAGE ON THE INTERNET. THIS WILL SOLVE SOCIETIES PROBLEMS.

    PRINT THIS IF YOU DARE.

  39. on 05 Oct 2008 at 8:24 pm xmtlfbyed zxlqbjvnw

    fgdlvy exygba tigrywsq oaexuvpz bsui vtylmkqs xtzhaf

  40. on 09 Oct 2008 at 1:16 pm outlet

    ycze xbvr ubeyad