spEak You're bRanes

Moderation Martyrs22 Sep 2008 11:04 am

By Nelson

Can wotsit re-energise thingy or something?

“mods – why was this comment rejected?
I do not believe that this comment breaks any of the forum rules
[Locutus_of_Borg], St. Davids Pembrokeshire, United Kingdom ”

Locutus – they frequently abuse their power in this way. And they haven’t got the decency to explain why, either.

(Bet this one gets rejected!!)
[Quartus45], Bradley Stoke

It makes me want to spit. Winston Churchill and Enoch Powell didn’t fight in Flanders fields just so that half your whining could be judged too boring to be published on a site dedicated to boring whining.

49 Responses to “Another Pair Of Distended Bollocks”

on 22 Sep 2008 at 11:14 am lotte

I realise that this is probably the least offensive type of HYS comment – but I just hate the stupidity of including little in-joke messages about comments being rejected, in a comment which he apparently thinks is going to be rejected anyway. It’s like an infinite loop of HYS inanity.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 11:20 am Leonard Nimoy

Well I suggest the mods not mess with the Borg, they are way badder than the rockers. Although the Borg are not as bad as Gordon Clown and the PC brigade.

Publish this if you dare.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 11:21 am mil dread

what a pair of cunts of a cunt’s cunt, to quote the impressively eloquent Kelvin
on 22 Sep 2008 at 11:32 am Rich(MMath)

This is exactly what sucks about free speech. People suddenly think they have some god given right to talk bollocks.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 11:47 am Alex

I bet every time one of these two gets a rejection letter for his 400-page novel about an oppressed white male filling in his tax-return, he screams “What about my RIGHT to freedom of speech!?!!??!”
on 22 Sep 2008 at 11:57 am Alex

This is exactly what sucks about free speech. People suddenly think they have some god given right to talk bollocks.

Freedom of speech is the fundamental right to talk bollocks. What’s infuriating is that these drivelards think they have the god-given right for everyone to drop everything and listen to them talk bollocks.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 11:58 am edna

Writing “I bet this doesn’t get published” is the same as texting the radio with “My messages never get read out”

reading them proves them wrong but its the mark of a retard
on 22 Sep 2008 at 11:59 am Dr Shade

If “Locutas_of_Borg” *really* wants to know he need look no further than his sig: he gets rejected (by the mods, his parents, and especially women) because he’s a sad, unfunny, Trekkie twat with the all the social skills and charisma of a runny shit – you know, the ones that are really sloppy (and usually an unexpected colour like bright orange or greenish-black) without quite qualifying as diarrhoea.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 12:17 pm Vicky

they frequently abuse their power in this way

No no NO! It’s their sodding website and they can do what they want. No matter how much you take it personally, the fact is that you’ve submitted your pointless drivel for their approval and it’s your fault if you’re scarred for life because you missed the chance for a gibbering pile of maggot’s minges to find out exactly what category of idiot you fit into. How the bloody buggering hell do these people cope with the rest of the mean, mean world?
I’m not sure who I’m addressing this to any more, sorry.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 12:24 pm red millie

How the bloody buggering hell do these people cope with the rest of the mean, mean world?

by posting on HYS
on 22 Sep 2008 at 12:27 pm alt-f4

“they frequently abuse their power in this way. And they haven’t got the decency to explain why, either.”

This is exactly how NAZI Germany got started. Before you know it the BBC moderators will pay some Dutchman to set fire to something. Something important.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 12:28 pm Vicky

I suspect that Dr Shade may not be a real doctor. That kind of detail could only come from a celebrity nutritionist.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 12:42 pm nurse millie

I used to work with a psychiatrist called Dr Shade, probably not the same one though, his area of expertise was anal retention
on 22 Sep 2008 at 12:44 pm Steve

Locutus – they frequently abuse their power in this way. And they haven’t got the decency to explain why, either.

And what realy gets to me is that we don’t get to see the reasons either. It would be fucking funny to see what HYS won’t alow.

I wonder if we could get one of the HYS mods to send the worst of the crap over to SYB so we can reply. A sort of HYSwikimodreplything, where we all work together to deal with this crap.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 12:52 pm setyourfacestostunned

Resistance is futile!

BANK!
on 22 Sep 2008 at 1:12 pm Simple Tom

Perhaps you should flag your comments with some sort of gold star, just so they know that your latest bit of aggrieved, racist snivelling is more urgent than the other 3,932 selfish bumsquawks awaiting their attention.
Nelson

Too true. I guess we’ve all had a post pulled we thought didn’t dersevre it, (and yelled “Oi! Fuck Off!” at the screen), but to leap from that to a wide-sweeping conspiracy is for idiots only. In fact, with very few exceptions, if you believe in any conspiracy theories, you’re a donkey’s doxy. (Except the one about Scientology – cos I believe that one)
on 22 Sep 2008 at 1:16 pm Alex

And what realy gets to me is that we don’t get to see the reasons either.

We can look at the House Rules:

Keep your contributions civil, tasteful and relevant. Please:
* No defamatory comments.
* Avoid contempt of court.
* Do not incite people to commit any crime, including incitement of racial hatred.
* Avoid breaking a court injunction.
* Do not post content which you’ve copied from someone else and don’t own the copyright.
* Do not post messages that are unlawful, harassing, defamatory, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, homophobic or racially offensive.
* Do not make multiple postings.
* No swearing.
* No spamming or flooding. Don’t repost the same message, or very similar messages, more than once.
* No personal information.
* Keep your posts relevant.
* No advertising, promotion of products or services, or posting of web links (URLs).
* Post in English only.
* No capital letters.
* No impersonating. Impersonating someone (including other members) is unacceptable.
* No inappropriate usernames (vulgar, offensive, etc).
* Abusing the complaints system. Please don’t abuse the complaints system.

See, I reckon of trawling through post after post of EXACTLY THE SAME MORONIC OPINION, you’ll start to see duplicate posts by different people, and accidentally reject them. Either that or it actually was a duplicate post, and [Locutus_of_Borg] is so special his freedom of speech extends to saying exactly the same thing over and over again.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 1:19 pm Joe C

I’ve heard that Quartus45 (of Bradley Stoke) frequently abuses small animals. And doesn’t have the decency to explain why, either.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 1:20 pm Dr Shade

@ Vicky & nurse millie

You were almost right!

I am, in fact, a nutritionally retentive celebrity anus*…

(* AKA a “Christopher Biggins” or “fat celebrity arsehole”)
on 22 Sep 2008 at 1:21 pm MILDRED

* No capital letters.

huh?
on 22 Sep 2008 at 1:25 pm Dr Shade

The House Rules:
* Do not post messages that are unlawful, harassing, defamatory, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, homophobic or racially offensive.
* Keep your posts relevant.
* No capital letters.

But… but… but…

*ALMOST* every HYS post we comment on has broken at least one of those rules and they GOT posted!!!1!ONEHUNDREDANDELEVEN!

Relax. I’m Schnorbitz.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 1:28 pm aSbo bAz

I assume we all know where the bad comments go when they’ve been rejected by the St. Peter-like guardians of HYS? They wander, lost, across the ether until they find there way to the Newsniffer…

http://www.newssniffer.co.uk/bbc/threads/mostcensored
on 22 Sep 2008 at 1:40 pm aSbo bAz

PS The ‘most voted’ for section on Newsniffer is hysterical. Nobody goes there, nobody reads the comments, but TinyTiegan still spends HOURS voting his rejected racism to the top of an unwatched leader-board. Every time he finds one of his posts on newsniffer, he gives it a couple of hundred votes, which takes ages.

Mind blowingly needy little hamster’s hole.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 1:50 pm Samwel

Fuck me, I just read the top recommended censored comment on newssniffer.co.uk:

How much do you recycle?

Written by [caltech2] on Wed Jul 11 16:09:16 UTC 2007. 755 recommendations.

Deport all immigrants immediately, each one will also be issued with a rucksack that is filled with rubbish to take back to their own countries.
This would be a good start

captain dave the hat, Londre

Heck they may even be able to use their rubbish as a floatie saving the UK the expense of paying for their return trip. Now that’s recycling!

Jeff Fogltance,

Incineration is the answer, might work for the rubbish too!

captain dave the hat, Jeff Fogltance and caltech2 are now at positions three, two and one respectively on my list of “people that need a good anal raping with a flaming, superglue-coated porcupine”.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 1:58 pm Tom

[caltech1/2/3/4] holds most of the top positions on most voted for on newssniffer; presumably again voting for himself. Highlights include believing in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and believing everyone who’s not at least a third-generation Briton should be deported. Oh, and this gem, after complaining repeatedly about his wonderfully racist views being suppressed:

The BBC are letting my comments stay on now, is that to make me feel guilty.

(… this is my first attempt to quote something on here. It’s obviously going to go wrong.)
on 22 Sep 2008 at 1:59 pm Dingleberry

I think this post (which is top self-voted spam of “Do Sexist Men Earn More” (another ‘asking for it’ thread) ticks just about every box!

It’s got little to do with ‘sexism’ as the left-wing BBC propaganda machine would like us to believe, and more to do with the fact that family men are simply more reliable employees than family women. And why wouldn’t they be, given how unbalanced the maternity and paternity leave standards are?

It’s all a moot point, anyway. Sooner or later, political correctness will make it impossible for ANY man to find work, unless they’re immigrants or ex-convicts.

Political Madness Gone Correct, Brighton, United Kingdom
on 22 Sep 2008 at 2:00 pm Alex

That’s amazing. The fact that they keep having to up the ethnic-cleansing stakes from deporting to drowning to burning alive. I bet [Adolf_H], New Berlin, Argentina was sitting in front of his computer screen thinking “Fuck me, how do I beat this?”.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 2:13 pm Vicky

Compare the suggested relative importance of:

* Avoid breaking a court injunction.

and:

* No capital letters.

then reflect on the redundant repetition of this:

* Abusing the complaints system. Please don’t abuse the complaints system.

I’ve a suspicion that the author of these rules may have been an intern with a really bad hangover.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 2:25 pm arsebanana

I have the misfortune to live near Bradley Stoke, better known as Sadly Broke but shortly to be renamed “Screaming HYS Negative Equity Daily Mail Shithole”.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 2:44 pm edna

* No capital letters.

what none at all?

thats maybe a little harsh
on 22 Sep 2008 at 3:25 pm tiny clanger

my list of “people that need a good anal raping with a flaming, superglue-coated porcupine”

That’s terrible.

Poor porcupine.

I suggest “a good anal raping with a red-hot, superglue-coated poker” or “a good anal raping with a flaming, superglue-coated cactus’.

bet this doesn’t get published!!!!!111!!!§§ toot toot here vcome the nany state pc braigade1! CENSORSHIP = FACT
on 22 Sep 2008 at 4:56 pm Simon

non sequitur i know but…

BBC headline: Eleven tourists kidnapped in Egypt.

Eleven European tourists have been kidnapped along with eight other people while making an off-road tour of southern Egypt.
=================================
So a better headline would be Nineteen people kidnapped, no? Cunts. Even the BBC so despised by mainstream cunts has stooped this level.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 4:58 pm Bo

I wouldn’t feel a shred of remorse if the anal-raping worm-hole invasion was achieved with a pan-dimentional intergalactic immigrant porcupine. They come here, abusing our discrepancies in space-time, drinking from our saucers. Jeff Fogltance’s anal cavity is too good for them!
on 22 Sep 2008 at 5:05 pm Iss

http://www.newssniffer.co.uk/bbc/threads/mostcensored

Arrrrrrghhhh.

How is it possible for people to be so completely hate-filled?
on 22 Sep 2008 at 5:14 pm Samwel

superglue-coated cactus

Cactus, dammit, that’s what those spiky plant things are called. Now I feel as thick as two short HYS’ers.

Anyway, what are you so worried about porcupines for, it’s PC liberal nazi-animal-rights gone MAD.

Maybe it should be an immigrant badger. Not as spiky as a porcupine or a cactus, though.

* No capital letters.

The average poster does obey some of the site rules then.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 5:19 pm Dr Shade

Oo! Look! I think I found a post from one of Chelsea’s parents in the “ban Christmas decorations” thread!

“i can’t believe what i am hearing this is gt britain not pakistan or other muslim countrys what about our children christmas lights and santas and all that should carry on never mind upsetting muslims ect if they dont like it get out of britain i dont know what the world is coming to its like the union jack it should be flown from every retail outlet it is british never mind what the muslims say this is britain they should not ban xmas because muslims dont like it sod them”
on 22 Sep 2008 at 5:51 pm Dingleberry

http://www.newssniffer.co.uk/bbc/threads/mostcensored

Arrrrrrghhhh.

How is it possible for people to be so completely hate-filled?

ISS

While it is shocking, remember that HYS (and therefore spin-off sites like Newsniffer) are dominated by a small hard-core of tubthumping loonies. I have it from the Ed of HYS that there are only ‘about a dozen’ manically addicted posters who have huge numbers of ‘sockpuppet’ memberships. They are addicted to seeing their name ‘in lights’ and so vote for themselves to pump their comments to the top. The same applies to newsniffer… TinyTiegan (aka Caltech aka Aussie Pride aka TrueEnglish Patriot aka Complete And Utter Fish’s Fanny aka 75 other memberships) has clogged Newsniffer and HYS with his ‘opinions’. It’s not as bad as it looks. The number of ‘recommendations’ counts for nothing.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 6:18 pm DumbBrit

“When I saw in your headlines that eleven tourists had been kidnapped in Egypt, I was horrified. However, once I read the story and found out that five of them were Huns, five were (doubtless greasy) Ities and one was a Romanian (I.E. a gyppo!!!11!) I could relax. In future, when there is an incident of this nature could you please make it clear in the headline whether any Britons are involved.

Yours Sincerely

Hilda Vole-Flaps
Sevenoaks

PS. if they’re not white, or if they’re sexual deviants then they don’t count”
on 22 Sep 2008 at 6:43 pm Bit Special

What kind of fucking surname is Fogltance anyway? Jeffy-boy would probably only book a forrun holiday on the grounds that the nearest beach MUST have a couple of dead gypsy girls covered with towels on it AT ALL TIMES.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 6:45 pm Bit Special

And insist that it is spelt ‘gipsy’ in the agreement, like the cunting Daily Mail persist in doing.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 8:36 pm Keef

‘Political Madness Gone Correct’ is leading the way in the baseless cynicism, hypocrisy, narcissism and all round smugness stakes on HYS.

Compare these…

From the Olympics thread: “As usual, we see a ludicrous sea of hyperbole from both sides of the debate.”

And, from the thread quoted by Dingleberry above: “Sooner or later, political correctness will make it impossible for ANY man to find work, unless they’re immigrants or ex-convicts.”

Which, of course, is entirely free from any kind of hyperbole whatsoever.

Interestingly, he also states that he is not entirely anti-immigrant. “If they work, they’re very welcome.” His post above suggests he may feel otherwise.

HYS breeds people like him, who set themselves up as a voice for plain old common sense without noticing how frequently they contradict themselves.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 9:08 pm mildred

I think I found a post from one of Chelsea’s parents in the “ban Christmas decorations” thread

i find it hard to believe that either bill or hillary would hold such racist views. or care that much about how many muslims there are in gt britain for that matter

[look! no capitals!!]
on 22 Sep 2008 at 10:20 pm Mal

While it is shocking, remember that HYS (and therefore spin-off sites like Newsniffer) are dominated by a small hard-core of tubthumping loonies.

But then, The Daily Mail claims a readership in the region of 6 million – HYSers are just the egregious tip of a iceberg of frozen shit.
on 22 Sep 2008 at 10:26 pm nursie

lots of anal shit on this bollocks thread
on 22 Sep 2008 at 11:03 pm Brokeback Britain

The police regularly arrest me for lurking with intent out side my local primary school and they havn’t got the decency to explain why, either.

Relax, or I’ll knob your first born.
on 23 Sep 2008 at 8:37 am mildred

BBC headline: Eleven tourists kidnapped in Egypt.

Eleven European tourists have been kidnapped along with eight other people while making an off-road tour of southern Egypt.

=================================

So a better headline would be Nineteen people kidnapped, no? Cunts. Even the BBC so despised by mainstream cunts has stooped this level.

Today it’s reported as:

Egypt says negotiations are still ongoing to secure the release of 19 people abducted in southern Egypt.

Good to see BBC taking SYB criticism on board.
on 23 Sep 2008 at 10:28 am Simon

wow i feel so influential!

i actually thought the sentence “11 european tourists and 8 other people were kidnapped” was ok in the body of the article, but to give that the headline “11 europeans kidnapped”, what the cock is wrong with you?
on 23 Sep 2008 at 7:43 pm Sally

Iss

http://www.newssniffer.co.uk/bbc/threads/mostcensored

Arrrrrrghhhh.

How is it possible for people to be so completely hate-filled?

What makes it about a billion times worse is that they can only show the rejected comments that were actually shown for a while, from topics that they HYS moderators thought were safe enough to make ‘reactively moderated’. Which is not many of them. Obviously.
on 23 Sep 2008 at 11:53 pm Brokeback Britain

I’d deny treatment for skin cancer to blacks bacuase they’ve clearly spent too much time in the sun. GENIUS.

p.s. bet this doesn’t get posted bacuase I’m a worthless cunt of a human being who deserves to be put down like a diseased dog.

"If you love Terrorists so much..
why don't you go live there?"

49 Responses to “Another Pair Of Distended Bollocks”

About

Search

Contributors

Tags

Archives

Pages

spEak You're bRanes

"If you love Terrorists so much.. why don't you go live there?"

49 Responses to “Another Pair Of Distended Bollocks”

About

Search

Contributors

Tags

Archives

Pages

"If you love Terrorists so much..
why don't you go live there?"