Tom’s absolutely nailed it.

No he didn’t. He’s said he thinks the corporate media is “extreme” but had scanned through a site dedicated to opposing that and managed to trawl up two examples of where he thinks they got it wrong. I agree he’s even got a point on the first one. But he’s using that to smear the entire output of something which (I’m telling you and I’m always right) is almost always spot on. This kind of implicit subservience to power and desperate, petty criticism of those who oppose it is completely routine but still leaves me scratching my head with bemusement every time. Why, when faced with Medialens, is most people’s reaction to try and find what’s wrong with it instead of what’s right? Are you the same cunts who read “Origin of Species” and get your knickers all wet because Darwin didn’t understand the mechanism of heredity?

So… if anyone else finds themselves merely hunting for “things they got wrong” then you’ve probably already made your decision and I’m not massively interested in dissecting your prejudices. Especially not here.

You cunts are the best cunts around. I expect objectivity from you… otherwise what hope is there eh?

Closing comments now. My contact details are available ya kna and I might even reply if you want to argue with me somewhere else. But don’t want no more here.

Love, Peace, Dogs On Strings, etc.

x

Ah well. Lunchtime!

=HYS for tinfoil hat soap-dodgers. END OF.

Sufficiently shit and short enough?

Oh, and btw, Tom’s absolutely nailed it.

Now let’s beat up the HYS-ers again, and not each other.

I don’t understand. Everyone knows that if someone likes something you don’t then they’re doing it deliberately to offend and goad you. If we’ve learnt nothing else from HYS, then we should’ve learnt that.