Permanently Bewildered06 Apr 2009 09:08 am
By Nelson

Thanks to Alex.

I like the sentiment here, but you do have to worry about someone who’s struggling to tell the difference between the “paedos who love our children” bogeyman and the “terrorists who hate our freedoms” bogeyman.

All of our children play outdoors – unaccompanied – and we live in London!!!!

Are we mad? Nope! Just not willing to wrap our kids up in cotton wool because of the occasional paedophile! Otherwise, it’s the paedophiles who have won.
[Nihilist_Materialist]

You need to spend a bit more time relaxing between opinions.

24 Responses to “Mixed Bogeys”

  1. on 06 Apr 2009 at 9:13 am Call of Davrodu

    Ah yes, the paedophiles collective aim of freeing our outdoor areas from children. We mustn’t let them win.

  2. on 06 Apr 2009 at 9:14 am fogbat

    I’m desperately hoping it’s a pisstake.

    Both “Nihilist” and “Materialist” seem like words that are rather more complex than you’d expect from the typical HYSayer.

  3. on 06 Apr 2009 at 9:32 am Alex

    But what do the paedos win? I mean, if I was a paedo, the thing I’d most like to win in all the world is a child playing unaccompanied outdoors. Apart from the Euro Millions Jackpot of course. Or a Ferrari.

  4. on 06 Apr 2009 at 9:33 am dirigible

    I’m currently relaxing between opinions but I’ve got something lined up for the autumn with a theatre in the Middle East.

  5. on 06 Apr 2009 at 9:39 am Boredom Clown, Merseyside not Lancashire

    But what do the paedos win? I mean, if I was a paedo, the thing I’d most like to win in all the world is a child playing unaccompanied outdoors. Apart from the Euro Millions Jackpot of course. Or a Ferrari.

    Potential ITV2 gameshow alert! WHO WANTS TO BE A FILTHY RICH PAEDOPHILE?

  6. on 06 Apr 2009 at 9:53 am wringhim

    Maybe Nihilist_Materialist is a paedo. In which case his/her actions are totally logical.

  7. on 06 Apr 2009 at 9:58 am dogbiscit

    In order to make some sort of snide, but archly well informed comment, I looked up nihilist on the internet, however nobody had bothered to post a bloody definition. I can only imagine that our government are to blame for this glaring oversight ?

    However I then realised that there really is no way to counter a four exclamation mark comment.

  8. on 06 Apr 2009 at 10:07 am Bit Special

    Just not willing to wrap our kids up in cotton wool because of the occasional paedophile!

    Do they mean ‘a little bit of sexual abuse never hurt anyone’?

  9. on 06 Apr 2009 at 10:35 am Darby

    Getting the cotton wool off is the best bit.

  10. on 06 Apr 2009 at 10:45 am Incontinentia

    I hate the “occasional paedophile”. Bloody part-timers. Either do it properly or not at all.

  11. on 06 Apr 2009 at 11:14 am samuel johnson

    and we live in London!!!!

    Do I take it that paedos naturally gravitate towards London like some kind of paedo black hole?

    Must be unnerving looking out of your window seeing men with beards and glasses hurtling towards the M25 event horizon.

    I’m glad I live miles away where only the sheep get molested.

  12. on 06 Apr 2009 at 11:17 am Daley Mayle

    That’s the problem with people today – not willing to put any effort in. In my day, paedos were raping and molesting children all day, every day, none of this perving at images on the internet namby-pamby nonsense. Nowadays, they barely even bother to loiter suspiciously near schoolyards. Fucking lightweights. They make me sick*. It’s paedo correctness gone mad!

    *I’m also not so keen on the paedophilia itself.

  13. on 06 Apr 2009 at 11:19 am Clovis Sangrail

    yes, take all our children off the playgrounds, then the paedophiles have won. Wait… what?

  14. on 06 Apr 2009 at 11:20 am Clovis Sangrail

    And I meant to add…love them four exclamation marks!!!!

  15. on 06 Apr 2009 at 11:29 am Albert Muffpie

    I love the specificity in

    All of our children play outdoors – unaccompanied – and we live in London!!!!

    which seems to imply that most parents in London select certain children of theirs to play outside, while the others must remain indoors. A city full of Fritzls, one might think.

    Also, is this person suggesting that their children have no friends, given that they always play outside unaccompanied. Poor things. Imagine being outcasts because of your parents.

  16. on 06 Apr 2009 at 11:53 am Rich (MMath)(Oxon)

    I try to leave the caps off bleach bottles,and place all kitchen knives within the reach of children.

    I don’t want my sharp objects and/or poisonous liquids to win.

  17. on 06 Apr 2009 at 12:13 pm Carbon Neutral

    What about the indoor paedos?

  18. on 06 Apr 2009 at 12:18 pm Funny Peculiar

    I don’t mind the occasional peadophile, but it’s when they start taking over whole communities and demanding their own schools and special rights and things, then it has gone too far.

    I don’t see why our kids should have to bend over backwards to accommodate these people. Why don’t they diddle their own children instead of forcing themselves on ours? Comin’ over here… shaggin’ our nippers… mutter mutter mutter… ‘taint right…

  19. on 06 Apr 2009 at 12:54 pm Dr Shade

    Potential ITV2 gameshow alert! WHO WANTS TO BE A FILTHY RICH PAEDOPHILE?

    Meh. Personally I prefer “Slebritty Paedo Factor on Ice” – almost pissed myself laughing at the sight of that fat cunt Gary Glitter trying to keep his balance on the skates while bumming that 12 year old!

    Now that’s entertainment…

  20. on 06 Apr 2009 at 1:01 pm Dr Shade

    Just not willing to wrap our kids up in cotton wool because of the occasional paedophile!

    Erm. Why does the occasional paedophile want you to wrap your kids up in cotton wool? Is it sort of like the kinky paedo version of gift wrap?

    Are we mad? Nope!

    I think you seriously need to get a second opinion on that…

    Also – it’s a statistical (and somewhat sickening) fact that the majority of paedophile assaults committed on children are perpetrated by a close friend or member of the family in the home – not some random paedo bogeyman snatching them off the streets you moronic cunt.

  21. on 06 Apr 2009 at 1:03 pm Dr Shade

    the majority of paedophile assaults committed on children

    As opposed to the paedophile assaults committed on old age pensioners, sheep and ford fiesta exhaust pipes obviously.

    My apologies for the redundancy of that phrase.

  22. on 06 Apr 2009 at 1:55 pm Bit Special

    Dr Shade – an alarming proportion of child sexual abuse is actually committed by other kids or young people (teens under 18), so sending them out to play with other children is no guarantee of safety in any case. Also, as everyone knows, adult paedos really look like paedos – have you ever seen a picture of someone in the news being done for kiddyfiddling and not thought ‘But he LOOKS like a paedo – how did no-one guess?!’? No, you have not. So even when kids are out with their mates, they’re still in potential danger. WONT SUMBODDY THINK OV TEH CHILDRUN?!!??!ONE?!!!ELEVEN!!!!!

  23. on 06 Apr 2009 at 8:53 pm pastry

    cars pose far more of a threat to the safety of loose children than paedos do, especially in that london, where there are lots of cars, some might say too many, and a good deal of them are driven by complete cunts.

    not only that but whenever there’s a bust up between a car and a paedo, the car generally wins.

  24. on 07 Apr 2009 at 8:36 am FrodoSaves

    Dammit woman, don’t you see? The Coalition of Greater London Paedophiles is at it again! It’s just what they want!