Curtain Twitchers and Self-appointed Sages30 Jun 2009 12:48 pm
By Alex

Slightly woolly from Glastonbury still. Alex has been busy though, so I’ll start publishing his fine work. Here’s one about the fucking internet.
- Nelson

Thanks to Matthew. How may the internet change to please you?

They also need to keep porn or a well known auction site out of my every search. If I want these I can search for them.
[jackmaxsam]

Exactly. Then they should make it so the words I type into the search engine mean what I meant them to mean and not the other meanings, so I only get results I want. And close down sites I don’t use to make more room. And make sure the ones I do use offer premium subscriptions for free and get updated as often as I look at them. But not too often so I have time to reread ones I like and don’t fall behind and end up confused. And put my TV programmes on when I’m IN, fuckdammit.

I would like the web to be free of pornography, specifically child pornography.
[nicebeeblebum], East Riding, United Kingdom

Odd. Most people just want pornography to be free. Though I suppose then perverts could still have wanks, so maybe your way’s better.

Are there applications that can be built on the web that you would like to see? Get rid of all Porn. Child Porn, adult porn the lot.
We The People

Google should write an application that just abolishes fucking altogether. Problem solved.

Thank God there’s a voice of reason, someone who saw that episode of Coupling with the speech about technology and women’s bottoms and learned from it:

There is a filter in google to stop you getting porn. But don’t dis the porn! If it wasn’t for porn not only would there be no interent, there would be no written word.
Sam

It’s true. The earliest known sample of writing, a tablet of Etruscan cuneiform dating back to fifteen thousand BC, translates roughly as “chubby russian teen (donkey OR goat) anal”.

38 Responses to “Put an End to This NOW Google!”

  1. on 30 Jun 2009 at 12:57 pm Chelsea

    I wouldn’t mind there not being any interent.

  2. on 30 Jun 2009 at 12:57 pm alt-f4

    It’s true. The earliest known sample of writing, a tablet of Etruscan cuneiform dating back to fifteen thousand BC, translates roughly as “chubby russian teen (donkey OR goat) anal”.

    There’s a cave painting in North Africa that depicts a man fucking a goat. Or maybe it’s a gazelle, I’m not too sure.

    Fucking neanderthals.

  3. on 30 Jun 2009 at 1:08 pm A Very Public Sociologist

    What’s the betting these HYS’ers spend a lot of their time “investigating” the porn they’ve found “accidentally” with just one hand on the keyboard?

  4. on 30 Jun 2009 at 1:26 pm ADNEsq

    Makes a change to them thinking Google are inventing new, scary products just to watch them watching porn through the window.

    Damn you interent!

  5. on 30 Jun 2009 at 1:35 pm That Bloke in the Corner

    Perhaps Jackmaxsam’s issue here is that, Mrs Jackmaxsam (should this mythical beast exist)keeps questioning his search history and he is trying to shift the blame, when really he just uses the internet to buy his DVD’s, from well known auction sites,of moaning keyboard tapping tossers in fantasy orgies with nubile Neanderthals

  6. on 30 Jun 2009 at 1:41 pm That Bloke in the Corner

    And this ‘WE THE PEOPLE’ bod, I am a people and I haven’t been consulted here, get rid of porn, what would be the point of the internet then?

  7. on 30 Jun 2009 at 1:57 pm Rob

    Why did this post not show up completely in the Reader? Bring back full posts!

  8. on 30 Jun 2009 at 2:57 pm Dolly's evil nemesis

    Slightly woolly from Glastonbury still.

    What a disgusting admission. I don’t come here for that sort of filth. We’ve got your number now, you sicko.

    Fact.

  9. on 30 Jun 2009 at 3:05 pm Scaryduck

    Having electrocuted myself TO DEATH last weekend, I looked on the internet, and yes, there IS electrocution porn.

    The sick fucks.

  10. on 30 Jun 2009 at 3:08 pm Jimbo

    There is a filter in google to stop you getting porn. But don’t dis the porn! If it wasn’t for porn not only would there be no interent, there would be no written word.
    Sam

    I didn’t know there was an interent… Is there more porn on that one?

  11. on 30 Jun 2009 at 3:32 pm That Bloke in the Corner

    Perhaps the inte-rent is a pay as you go version, with a lot more specialised porn.

  12. on 30 Jun 2009 at 4:45 pm tlumacz

    I’m just faintly disillusioned Alex watches ‘Coupling’.

  13. on 30 Jun 2009 at 5:10 pm Albert Muffpie

    Are there applications that can be built on the web that you would like to see? Get rid of all Porn. Child Porn, adult porn the lot.
    We The People

    Some interesting capitalisation there suggests that Child Porn is rather more interesting to this We The People chap than mere adult porn. Assuming that he’s not referring to porn for adults and porn for children. Surprised no one’s got into the porn4kids market just yet. There’s gold in them thar hills…

  14. on 30 Jun 2009 at 7:05 pm Bit Special

    Feh, all last week I was gagging (oo-er) for a new post but now it’s here, the temp is so fucking hot that my brain has melted and I just can’t handle the length of this one (fnar, fnar). I was kinda hoping for something along the lines of ‘Wacko Paedo Jacko is dead, boo-fucking-hoo. Discuss’ underneath some hysterical and/or unfortunately-worded HYS twatbasketry, but heyho.

    I wouldn’t have this problem on the interent. FACT.

  15. on 30 Jun 2009 at 7:35 pm col

    Inter-ent pron? Fucking trees, man!

  16. on 30 Jun 2009 at 8:15 pm Violetta

    “I’m just faintly disillusioned Alex watches ‘Coupling’.”

    Not without a prolonged fight over the remote, and a lot of emotional blackmail.


  17. “there IS electrocution porn”

    Rule 34 of The Internet: if it exists, there is porn of it. No exceptions.

  18. on 30 Jun 2009 at 9:01 pm Death

    How curious that, according to Sam, that most pictorial of pastimes should apparently be responsible for the written word, and by extension surely LANGUAGE more generally. You can just imagine two cavemen wanking, going “y’know what? we ought to write this down…”

    1/10 Sam.

  19. on 30 Jun 2009 at 9:03 pm That Geezer

    Surprised no one’s got into the porn4kids market just yet. There’s gold in them thar hills…

    Isn’t porn4kids just big spurting cocks with hairy balls drawn on every picture in school textbooks? Or is that child porn? Wait, I’m getting confused now…

  20. on 30 Jun 2009 at 10:14 pm Dr Feelgood

    If it wasn’t for porn not only would there be no interent, there would be no written word.
    Sam

    I think Sam has a very good point here – after all, didn’t many alphabets start as pictograms?

    You can still see evidence of this in our Latin characters:

    l – so firm and erect, cheeky!
    m – you saucy minx with your two heaving mounds, ooh…
    o – soft, round and receptive, ah ah, oh God! Sorry.

    Every word we type on the interewb is just propagating pornography – all writing is filth, ban it! Ban everything!

  21. on 01 Jul 2009 at 12:10 am Hitler's penis

    Ban everything!

    NOW you’re talking!

    Jawohl, mein – ah – mich selbst!

  22. on 01 Jul 2009 at 12:12 am Gobbler the Oral Sex Alsatian

    my brain has melted

    woof woof woof
    slurp slurp slurp
    woof tasty! woof

  23. on 01 Jul 2009 at 1:31 am Pirate Pete

    I’m ashamed to say it, but when A Bit Special said “the temp is so hot” my first thought was, “hey, there must be some sexy new bloke in her office” – and then I noticed that my brains were also dribbling out of my ears, due to the absurdly high temperature that we are currently having to endure :\

  24. on 01 Jul 2009 at 1:33 am Pirate Pete

    Oh, and I’m also getting my coat – that’ll be the one with the ice cubes in the pockets…

  25. on 01 Jul 2009 at 10:37 am Bit Special

    @Pirate Pete – I don’t work in an office, ye scurvy dog! That would require me to dress in smart-but-dull clothes, be polite and vaguely or openly subservient to a boss (or bosses) and do repetitive work, all of which I am genetically incapable of. Neither am I a vet, as Grov seemed to be asking on the previous thread, unless that was a joke I didn’t get.

    It’s too hot to get even a metaphorical coat. Phew, worra scorcher, etc.

  26. on 01 Jul 2009 at 10:57 am Jonny

    You seem to have fucked over RSS reader users. Why not put ads in your RSS feed instead of truncating and making us visit this site? EH?

  27. on 01 Jul 2009 at 11:01 am Colnel Archibald Foxworthydean

    I hear it might rain.

  28. on 01 Jul 2009 at 11:50 am Chelsea

    Yo Bit Spesh, youza teacha and me claims me ten quid prize.

  29. on 01 Jul 2009 at 4:08 pm Rod Wrongnob

    I reckon BS is a children’s entertainer, i.e., A CLOWN. Probably one of those female mime artist ones that dress as Charlie fucking Chaplin.

    Oh, and the Book of Genesis – Filth!

  30. on 01 Jul 2009 at 5:15 pm Bit Special

    Piss off, you cheeky buggers, you’re all wrong!

  31. on 01 Jul 2009 at 5:18 pm Bit Special

    Aaargh, I added an unnecessary comma – must stop reading SYB and start brutal self-flagellation in penance.

    Yeah, penance. That’s the reason. Uunngh.


  32. I dunno — the imperative case can happily accommodate a comma between verb and noun. You would definitely be better served with a semicolon instead of that second comma, though, so self-flagellation may be called for anyway.

  33. on 01 Jul 2009 at 8:04 pm Marcus

    > Surprised no one’s got into the porn4kids market just yet

    I’m willing to bet they have, but I’m NOT going to Google it.

    And of course there’s an interent. How else do you think the Ents share their porn? When an Ent’s got wood… (fill in your own joke here, I can’t be arsed)

  34. on 02 Jul 2009 at 1:03 am Joe C

    You know, if the Internet was cleared of porn then I might finally get some work done.

  35. on 02 Jul 2009 at 2:45 am Mrs M. Whitehouse

    Is there really that much porn on the interent? How does one actually measure it? I surf the web all the time and seldom come across hanky panky.

  36. on 02 Jul 2009 at 5:58 pm Outraged of Glasgow

    You don’t come across hanky panky, you come across your keyboard. Unless the aforementioned hanky is used, in which case the correct preposition is ‘in’, viz “to come in a hanky”. Usage of a sock in this manner is also acceptable.

  37. on 03 Jul 2009 at 10:35 am Grov

    Neither am I a vet, as Grov seemed to be asking on the previous thread, unless that was a joke I didn’t get.

    It was indeed a joke but, looking back, I don’t get it either.

  38. on 04 Jul 2009 at 11:45 am Colonel Archibald Foxworthydean

    I hear it might be sunny