Comments on: (Almost a) Full House

By: Ed aka Nearly Craig

Ed aka Nearly Craig — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 15:52:43 +0000

The previous comment link didn’t work; the comment is on “Powers Behind the Showers”.

By: Ed aka Nearly Craig

Ed aka Nearly Craig — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 15:49:16 +0000

To be fair to Nearly, his previous vastly overlong, unexplained post was reasonably clear in its ill-thought-through attempt to show inconsistency in what journalists reported about the climate over the years. The fact that this misses more points than I care to enumerate is just par for the course.

By the way, see Clovis’s comment here, urging all SYBers to simply ignore Nearly’s spurtings from now on. I for one will actually be doing so.

By: ligne

ligne — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 15:22:44 +0000

all the statements I listed earlier cannot be true & thus that we have been lied over a very long time

you know, never did i imagine i would live to see someone actually use the chewbacca defence in what appears to be a serious (if monumentally retarded) argument.

i doff my cap at you, good sir, and hereby award you one interweb in recognition of your awesome smarts and logics. (please note that it’s not edible.)

By: Professoe Craig's better looking brother

Professoe Craig's better looking brother — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 13:13:07 +0000

Stop embarrassing the family Neil.

By: Setle down class Professor Craig's here

Setle down class Professor Craig's here — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 12:57:12 +0000

Cloned again then. Such an honour.

By: Ed aka Nearly Craig

Ed aka Nearly Craig — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 19:42:07 +0000

No I’m not.

By: Setle down class Professor Craig's here

Setle down class Professor Craig's here — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 17:56:47 +0000

I’m sorry to everyone for being such a cunt.

By: Ed aka Kelvin BUT NOT ACTUALLY KELVIN UNLESS YOU'RE COMIC BOOK GUY

Ed aka Kelvin BUT NOT ACTUALLY KELVIN UNLESS YOU'RE COMIC BOOK GUY — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 16:04:36 +0000

I think “Nearly Craig” is his new name.

[Nearly's] posts recently have veered away from amusingly ironic into turgidly repetitive.

Why did I read that as “turdily repetitive”?

By: Kelvin

Kelvin — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 12:38:38 +0000

Setle down class

Ganted

Hey Neillllllll, can we have another of your smug little pronouncements that anyone who can’t spell your name is an idiot please? Only your posts recently have veered away from amusingly ironic into turgidly repetitive.

By: Setle down class Professor Craig's here

Setle down class Professor Craig's here — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:22:35 +0000

Yers ligne you stupid cow I do know that 1998 is “one of the hottest years on record” that is the point. What is claimed about warming is that it is WARMING. Thus, if what the BBC etc assert is in any way truthful, the “baseline” running through 1998 should not be a flat line but a rising one, or even a rising curve. The fact is that we have had a fall since then (which is why 1998 was warmer). The fact that we have had 2 years of significant fall merely puts the tin hat on it.

It must be obvious to anybody who is not a self lobotomised domesticated animal, that all the statements I listed earlier cannot be true & thus that we have been lied over a very long time – the current warming scam being merely the most heavily propagandised scare story. Ganted there are a lot of such domesticated creatures
around.

I suggest you lie down & take an eye of newt.