Decietfully Lied To (inc oncosts)
By KelvinThe beeb has rolled out its new Democracy Live service. Correctly realising that the problem with politics is there’s too much bullshit to listen to, it lets you search inside videos for things that were said in parliament. It’s brilliant, both technically and because never again will politicians be able to whinge that no-one listens to what gets said in the House. So wouldn’t it be ironic if someone completely ignored the topic of the post to whinge about how no-one ever listens to him?
I would like to know why moderators at the BBC often reject my comments, even though there is nothing Racial, sexual or otherwise offensive, save that that some left wing moderator doesnt like what I am saying.
So here goes. Why is it no-one will talk about unchecked immigration or the chance of the people of this country being given a vote to leave the EU, as we were decietfully lied to by both labour and Conservatives back in the 70′s.? "Oh, its just a trade thing!". Yeah, ok, look where it has got us now.
£15Bn a year worse off, not inc oncosts to business's, and meddlesome Eurocrats. Now they are wanting a president. Euro-realists predicted this over 10 years ago and no-one listened. Are they listening now?
Emzdad
Yes, why will no-one talk about these things? Why isn’t there a huge festering dunny full of comments about this, complete with an ecosystem of great big arses delivering shit, flies buzzing around surveying the shit and dung beetles proud of all the shit they’ve rolled up and sat on? Why, if Emzdad ever found such a place he’d find it so exciting he’d probably do a little poo.
Also I’m putting him in the Racists category because anyone who has to insist their comments aren’t racist probably definitely is.
39 Responses to “Decietfully Lied To (inc oncosts)”
first!
emzdad: what a walrus’s wobbling wet love hole.
I wish people would talk about these things, instead of filling the media with continual good news stories about unchecked immigration and Eurocrats and how much it all costs us.
I suspect that Emzdad gets moderated so often because he rants on about spongin’ immugrunts coming to this country raping our country,let in by lying cheating politicians who are all shagging the BBC up the arse.
Strangely some people may well get offended by these sorts of comments-but in Emzdad’s Utopia this is how we will all speak. Baboons festered bollock is what he is.
I challenge everyone to use the phrase “huge festering dunny” at work today. Preferably in front of a customer/client.
If you’re a student that’s just too easy so you have to use “great big arses delivering shit” instead.
If you’re doley scum or retired then you have to cover yourself in mayonnaise and then roll around in the street screaming “I am the silent majority!” over and over and over and over again until someone finally believes you.
GO!
What I want to know is if he can’t spell “businesses”, how the fuck does he know a technical accounting term like “oncost”? True, it’s never a plural, but what the fuck?
I’m very happy his comment has been deleted, because if there’s one thing I like it’s consistency. And if there’s another thing I like it’s pissing off Emzdad. I didn’t realise it before today, but now it’s one of the things I like most in the world.
I accept your challenge Nelson – I have a team meeting later today, having just seen the agenda it should be easy to slip it in.
Indeed, challenge accepted. I have a supplier coming in at 1500 to show off some products. I’m the customer, so she won’t bat an eyelid if she knows what’s good for her.
Also Nelson, he capitalised the adjective ‘racial’ which adds further weight to his certain racism.
Fnarr Fnarr
Just 5 minutes ago
Client: “What do you think of our database?”
Me: “It is a huge festering dunny of badly indexed tables.”
What do I win?
Also, whatever happened to Barker, the Blowjob Dog or whatever his name was?
I challenge everyone to use the phrase “huge festering dunny” at work today. Preferably in front of a customer/client.
————————————
I just used it with a supplier. Half a point, or riducled for being a bit of a pussy?
Actually, capitalising “Racial” is the only evidence of racism here.
Unless you think it’s racist to not want to be part of the EU, which would be massively retarded.
How would you arrive at such an idea anyway?
Fact 1. “The BNP don’t like the EU”
Fact 2. “The BNP are racist.”
Conclusion: “People who don’t like the EU are racist.”
** LOGIC ERROR AT LINE 3 **
I’m doley scum but I don’t fancy the mayonnaise task, I am off to the library later can I still win if I tell the librarian the place smells like a festering dunny (which it does, so she probably won’t be too offended).
I arrived at it by agreeing with the statement “also I’m putting him in the Racists category because anyone who has to insist their comments aren’t racist
probablydefinitely is.” I like to call this ‘reading’.The real question is, I’m not sure if my strikethrough is going to work. I’ll celebrate and commiserate now to save time.
1. Hooray!
2. Strikethrough fail.
Now they are wanting a President.
Finger on the pulse of today, Emzdad has.
Yet Twat Griffin is an MEP so surely we have **LOGIC ERROR AT LINE 1** If I am right
That is horrible accuracy. Anyone who relies on this for searches can expect severe disappointment.
Whatever. To the important stuff:
I just hope the BBC’s servers can cope with the torrent of extra traffic that’ll be coming from his blog. Sometimes promotion can go too far.
ffs:Evidences of racism. [Logic Version]
Maybe “unchecked immigration” has a certain xenophobic overtone that ordinary “immigration” just doesn’t have? And maybe using the “un” prefix will help people decide how it needs to be?
Let’s try an experiment for whingebag bigots.
“There’s a problem at HYS with unridiculed racist twatbaskets.”
Ah yes, it works perfectly.
i’ve yet to come across anyone anti-EU who gives the reason of ‘well, you know, trade issues, blah blah’ rather than ‘i don’t want be ruled by forruns. i love the queen an’ that and want bendy bananas too’
at best you could call emzdad horrendously xenophobic, but it’s probably quicker and easier, and more truthful, to call him a racist mongoose’s mimsy
What’s wrong with just going with what Kelvin said? Emzdad feels the need to tell us all that he isn’t a racist. Therefore, he is. We don’t NEED any more evidence.
God, I pity Em.
Interesting. FFS feels the need to protest that Emzdad isn’t racist. Which one does that make racist. I’m currently unsure.
I find the most Eurosceptics utterly depressing. And sadly, it is easy to get the impression that most people in this country are Eurosceptics. I know that people seem to be more mobilised by negativity than positivity, and that “x% of population want to leave EU” is more newsworthy and sensational than “x% of population want to stay in the EU”, but seriously, where are all the pro-EU people? Why is no-one in a position of influence extolling the virtues of being in the EU? Is it because they know that it’s a potential vote loser?
It really fucks me off.
Way to go with that rhetorical question.
oOo-oOo-oOo-oOo
I just told an old and valued client that her requirements specification was a “huge festering dunny”, at which she laughed. She must think I said “Hugh’s molesting a bunny”, which is actually hilarious, because up to now he’s confined himself to otters. I thought everyone knew that otters were the gateway to rabbits.
One does like the EU. One is desperately hoping they will ask that nice Mr Blair to be it’s president so one can abdicate in favour of him, just to annoy one’s eldest!
God save the me!
Good news, everyone (channelling Professor Farnsworth there) – Emzdad has been modded, which is good going for a relatively innocuous posting on what is effectively a node of HYS. Maybe it wasn’t racist (or do I mean Racist?) enough? The one I feel sorry for is Em – what’s she done to deserve a parent who hides his true identity behind his daughter’s name?
Should justice ‘focus on victims’?
I’m hungover, I admit, but this has got me totally stumped.
I know! I know!
It’s because you’re boring as shit. In fact, the moderators got so sick of getting your posts about not being racist, sexist or offensive, no matter what the topic, they now just confine everything you write to their huge festering dunny full of comments like this.
Now fuck off until you find something interesting and relevant to say.
(That ought to get rid of him for at least 1076 years).
My nomination for the “missing the point” award:
Come on, Gordon Brown, why don’t we execute more kindly black men with magical powers? Maybe they could fix your dodgy eye?
*coughs* I before E except after C, Kelvin *coughs*
I described the work toilet as a huge festering dunny to a client/customer today. Except I did so in a really cheery, obsequious, girly way so I could watch his face as his brain struggled with matching my words to my manner and wondered if he’d imagined it. Possibly the highlight of my working life (which isn’t saying much).
Twenty-Ninth!
Shaem I wasn’t First! but then again it’s also a shame that whoever thinks posting First! is an achievement is not shot dead by wolves.
I forgot at work but I did say “huge festering dunny” to my mum when she called earlier. Does that count?
(Thirty) First!
I got my words mixed up and called my flatmate a ‘great big shit delivering arse’ instead.
Sorry folks.
It’s ironic that I have a huge festering dunny on which I did a great big arse delivering shit yet haven’t told anyone about it til now
And now I look at it, I see it’s a tautology too! Silly old me, selecting these quotes for my headlines!
Bollocks.
(Shuffles off to wipe glasses)
I think Jan B’s point is that all European countries, including us (hey, s/he implicitly acknowledges our Europeanness!), don’t imprison nearly enough people. Which is a view only an HYSer could hold.
I’ll give you a hand. I think what Jan B is trying to say is that the first contention – that England has the highest proportion of its population in prison – isn’t true (Spain, Poland and Austria are higher), and so she’s provided another bollocks comparison to counter the untrue proposition.
It’s fighting bollocks with bollocks.
Either that or Jan B is just another tossbag, and this is just another example of how ‘factual’ nonsense becomes self-replicating.
Remember, by making that comparison Jan B thought she was really smart and really clever. Jan B probably has at least one qualification. Which instantly puts her leagues above Neil Craig.
I suspect I’m not the only reader who has a secret crush on Bit Spesh.
Did I say secret? Oh well
I know I’m comically late to the party, but just to resolve the Ethiopa/Somalia dingdong, the following is correct:
“I think Jan B’s point is that all European countries, including us [...] don’t imprison nearly enough people.
In the same way that Ethiopa has very very little wealth (but more than Somalia), Jan B believes that we imprison very very few criminals (but more than those crazy liberal Eurolands).
However, the fact that it took some 5 minutes to decipher and the fact that Jan B thinks more prisoners = good, right-thinking, safe society makes her a flaccid ferret’s phallus.