Here is the brilliant follow-up Daily Fail article with Mr Burton’s claim that he did badly deliberately. Read it and gweep [sic - Viz lives].

“What possessed the unfortunate contestant to opt for ‘Angels’ as his specialist subject? Maybe an angel appeared before him and told him to do it promising divine help, then returned to heaven where he and the rest of the angels sat back and pissed themselves laughing as the contestant floundered.”

Yeah, but laughing at the easily led is pretty much all the fun we get. That, and moving the thing you just put down, and hiding your car keys. Anyhow, we don’t laugh much since Mr God stopped us eating lobsters. We now eat eagles, and they taste scratchy.

I’d love to know the reason for his incoherent rant about the uni though – oh the mystery of it all…

The awards are:
1) Most total misinterpretation of audience. Blaming the left wing university types on the *Guardian* website?

2) Most erroneous use of the phrase “educated choice”.
(a) by not giving any education as to what the BNP’s alternative policy actually is.
(b) The notion that the *educated* choice is to ignore the majority of scientific opinion.
(c) That the educated choice would be expressed with such lack of basic English skills. What is a clerus? Google has it as the name of a really obscure Turkish saint.

He also gets a notable mention in:
The “copying your opponent’s slurs” category, for his overuse of the word Fascist.
The “inappropriate use of inverted commas” category for “universities” and “invest”.

Funnily enough, in order to get on, I was “thoroughly tested to make sure I was intelligent enough.” And happily I got a high enough score that SS, in his grimy dressing gown eating a pot noodle, won’t be able to sneer at me.

…I think that he came along with life experience and was told to fuck off, working in a garage for your entire life wasn’t work experience relevant for a PhD in Climate Science.

Henceforth, his emails were ignored by the CRU and there was even a restraining order taken out.

A bit like the CRU should have done to Stephen “58 FOI requests in one day” MacIntyre.

Personally, I would have reached that point and binned every single request and sent him 58 replies reminding him of the clause in the FOIA that bars “vexatious” queries.

Despite all the funds clunked into near fascist “universities”, it turns out they cannot rebut fault pointed to them by even freelancing/pensioner sceptics.

Is there some course what I can do? Pensioner sceptic, now there’s a job I fancy. Pensioners? Bah! That’s what they’d LIKE you to believe.