Delusions of Grandeur and Moderation Martyrs and Racists and Self-appointed Sages29 Dec 2009 02:06 pm
By Nelson

I found Davidethics, the most pompously petulant bumgrape I’ve seen for quite a while. David is quite sure that he is very, very clever.

First off, I’ve collected a few of his “moderation martyr” sign-offs. He not only believes that HYS is important enough that people are trying to censor it to stop the truth getting out but that he, in particular, is one of the brave voices of dissent that they are so desperate to silence. This kind of tinpot mentalism is the essence of all the good comments. Sure, there’s endless stupidity and racism on there, but it’s the ones that really believe HYS is important that make us giggle. This is just the tip of the iceberg:

And I wish I could speak my mind on HYS on this important matter. It is like the 1930s.
So go on. Reject this.

OK. Now reject this.

For goodness sake – you cannot reject this comment.

Dear moderators – ask your bosses if they will allow you to publish this note mentioning the dolphin cull: it is an envrionmental matter.

I guess this comment will not get past the moderators. But I don’t care

Are we allowed to criticise developers on HYS? Maybe just put this comment at the end of the moderation queue eh.

Moderators have no fear I make no comment on religion; your relativism is safe.

I expect David wrote to “Jim’ll Fix It” every fucking week and only a BBC/Soviet plot prevented him from getting to meet Sebastian Coe. And don’t get him started on the national fucking lottery. Stands to reason he should have won by now if it wasn’t rigged.

I came from a poor area but went to a grammar school where the teachers laughed at our working class accents. We were taught how Britain ruled the world and how the empire would last forever, that black children were piccanninies, and that we were heading for a new ice age. We were told that everything to do with America was common and brash, and that science was for boys and literature for girls. I truanted until I was old enough to be expelled. Took A levels part time, got a first and a Phd.
[Davidethics]

You’re probably beginning to get a sense of just how clever he is and I expect you are now keen to see this great public intellectual enter the theatre of HYS debate, illuminating truth and laying waste to myth. A bit like Gandalf at the battle of Helm’s Deep.

I disagree with capital punishment. But taking the cultural relativist position which is dominant in the UK – and here on HYS -the Chinese were absolutely right to execute him, for whatever reason and for whatever standard of proof is relative to their culture.
It is pointless for politicians and the media to complain. If multiculturalism is acceptable then anyone can do what they like -anywhere – with our citizens.
Meanwhile – some of us believe in universal values.But not on BBC forums.
[Davidethics]

Woah David, slow down fella! Multiculturalism? Cultural relativisim? Universal values? This is heady stuff. But you can’t just go chucking all that shit in and expect us all to understand. Perhaps you need to go back a few steps and explain? If we’re to reject this cultural relativism thingy and work towards a set of universal values, at last uniting the planet in justice and peace, how should we go about it?

As the war on terror is likely to continue for many years we should take a long term view. Look into the possible introduction of separate air transport for certain groups of people, as identified by their passports. To save naming any ethnic group let us, for example, have separate air transport for the people of Wonderland whose deity is the Wizard.. They could have wonderland pilots too, and have wonderland insurance rates.And the rest of us would not require such stringnent controls.
[Davidethics]

Gotcha. We need to ban Pakis.

32 Responses to “Certain Groups”

  1. on 29 Dec 2009 at 2:36 pm Enzyme

    Never went to school but still got a PhD?
    Psssttt… David: I don’t think that a doctorate from Bob’s International Internet University, Illinois really counts.

  2. on 29 Dec 2009 at 2:41 pm Nelson

    I forgot this one…

    These checks provide jobs for bureaucrats and are a means of raising revenue. Their introduction was politically inspired to show that the government is concerned about child abuse, and now the revisions are an attempt to show that the government is concerned with over regulation. The truth is: paedophiles will work the system and be able to get to their victims, and many are their parents. As a pioneer of teaching moral theory to children I have decided it is not worth the effort.
    [Davidethics]

    So unfair. You selflessly dedicate MANY years to spreading racism in schools, and then you touch ONE little boy’s winky and suddenly it’s all “paedo this” and “CRB that”.

  3. on 29 Dec 2009 at 2:54 pm helen_s

    ‘Like the 1930s’? Who the FUCK does this gobshite think he is? Listen pal, you’re getting your moronic comments left off an unimportant website because people can see they’re moronic. You are not getting killed by fascists. I imagine they would quite like you, anyway. So please go and put your head in a bucket of rats’ piss.

  4. on 29 Dec 2009 at 3:04 pm The Silent Majority

    How fucking typical. They complain about cultural relativism when it means not blaming Muslims for every single fucking problem in the Islamic world, yet support the position when it means the execution of a mentally ill man. Fuckers.

  5. on 29 Dec 2009 at 3:47 pm Mr Cat

    Wendy certainly loves taking the cultural relativist position when is comes to executing British mentally ill drug smugglers

    What do you expect from such a barbaric country as China? They don’t like it when our Government says they are wrong. We should have nothing to do with such a barbaric country stuck in the dark ages. They do not let their people have full access to the internet, they execute people for little crimes, have no human rights, only allow one child per family and skin cats and dogs alive with no emotion at all. They have no compassion. We should all boycott China and have no relationship.

    Wendy Keelan, London

    I’d love to Wendy but I want to watch Eastenders tonight and those heartless barbarians only went and made my TV. Sneaky devils.

  6. on 29 Dec 2009 at 3:49 pm wringhim

    paedophiles will work the system and be able to get to their victims, and many are their parents.

    I’m not sure if he means paedophiles are abusing their parents, or if he means that parents are able to “work the system” to get to their children. Clearly we need to separate all parents from their children right now, and make them fly on separate airplanes.

  7. on 29 Dec 2009 at 3:57 pm Enzyme

    As a pioneer of teaching moral theory to children…

    I think that David’s PhD from a made-up university involved a chapter on why “pioneer” is actually just an abbreviation for “self-important knownothing”.

    Won’t somebody think of the children?

  8. on 29 Dec 2009 at 4:08 pm Jones

    teaching moral theory to children….

    i.e. sticking his cock through the school gates.

  9. on 29 Dec 2009 at 4:16 pm random punter

    Have Your Say service not available

    We are having serious technical problems with the Have Your Say software which our engineers are working to fix.
    We hope to restore the service as soon as possible.
    We apologise for any inconvenience.

    Fuck. Cue conspiracy theorists. “Gad sir, these Chinese are devilish…..”

    And all I wanted to do was to look at Davidethics’s profile to see if he really was a speech-impaired version of that fine recording artist of the 1970s.

    There are four BBC staff in my dining room at the moment with Mrs RP (so that makes five). I shall now go and eject them and instruct them to ensure normal service really is resumed as soon as possible. brb.

  10. on 29 Dec 2009 at 4:59 pm DJ Dooza

    The banning pakis idea was good untill the Nigerian ‘terrorist’. He had a terrorist name though, so should have been caught.

    What do i do though? I look middle eastern, have a portuguese surname, and the forenames of parents that looked through a bible bashers guide to babies names – i must be a terrorist, no-one could make that up! ;-)

  11. on 29 Dec 2009 at 5:12 pm That Bloke in the Corner

    I suspect that that fact he challenges the moderators to not publish his verbal diarrhoeal outpourings, means that they quite happily do, the ones where he doesn’t goad them, get trashed-they just like messing with his head and turning him into another HYS moderation martyr.You’ve got to give the moderators their due, having to sift through HYS every day, they have got to have some fun.

  12. on 29 Dec 2009 at 5:13 pm That Bloke in the Corner

    The banning pakis idea was good untill the Nigerian ‘terrorist’.

    Yeah but he was brown, so it is the same difference in HYSland.

  13. on 29 Dec 2009 at 5:14 pm That Bloke in the Corner

    Fuck, not doing well on the blockquotes today,good job it is nearly home time.

  14. on 29 Dec 2009 at 5:48 pm random punter

    @DJ Dooza

    What do i do though? I look middle eastern, have a portuguese surname, and the forenames of parents that looked through a bible bashers guide to babies names…

    What you should do, my friend, is keep looking over your shoulder… we don’t like your sort around these here parts, with your swarthy complexions and funny names, and your ability to post emoticons. You’re right about the Nigerian chappy’s terrorist name though – should have been a no-brainer,

    I just checked David Ethics profile on Facebook, and felt the need to share this with you all:

    David Ethics Friends
    Showing:
    Recently Updated Everyone

    David has no friends.

    His profile picture is very good.

    I browsed his HYS posts, and see a sad figure – I almost empathised with him for a moment, but thought better of it.

    Maybe we should have a new tag for folks like David – Bitter. Bitterness is what comes across in much of his “work”, bitterness at a life that’s passed him by, at his unacknowledged and unrealised potential, and the certain knowledge that nobody who reads his impassioned prose actually gives a toss what he thinks or says. A lot of the people who feature on SYB would slot in to that group – if only they could find some way to get together and chunter unhappily to each other, the world would be a better place.

    I’m tempted to send him a friend request on Facebook, just to break his duck. I really must get round to setting up a bogus Facebook account for opportunities such as this.

  15. on 29 Dec 2009 at 6:11 pm joeminustalent

    h appears to be an online and more fuckwitted version of major misunderstanding from the viz, except more devoid from reality.

  16. on 29 Dec 2009 at 8:05 pm Ed aka Cuger-Jaggar

    I think you’ll find you mean that he’s either more divorced from reality, or that his ravings are devoid of reality.

    You’re welcome.

  17. on 29 Dec 2009 at 8:28 pm Nick Griffin's Glass Eye

    I loved his take on the Christmas number one.

    “Once again. I like the Christmas number 1. It is very good to listen to. I have not bought it. I do not think it will harm X Factor, which is very good. And Simon Cowell has a good track record so he will not be harmed. The future looks good for MacElderry and Rage Against the Machine who, like the very famous punk and anarchy bands, are very good and popular and will one day receive awards from the Royal Family and possible knighthoods.”

    Quickly followed by an exasperated “For goodness sake – you cannot reject this comment.”

    What a prize arsewit.

  18. on 29 Dec 2009 at 9:25 pm Stew

    We should respect his academic credentials: Professor of Madeupology at the University of Hishouse.

  19. on 29 Dec 2009 at 9:45 pm random punter

    Thank goodness for straight-talking Canadians like Diana.

    Added: Tuesday, 29 December, 2009, 17:41 GMT 17:41 UK
    This is an outrage. To execute a mentally ill human being. Of course it is admirable the British government has taken a strong stance (after the event) yet it would also have been admirable had they taken a strong stand against the extradition of someone else mentally ill – Nick (sorry last name forgotten) with Asperger’s who entered a sensitive computer system The Americans promised they would ‘fry’ him once the extradition to the US was completed.

    Diana Atkin, Canada

    Yep – bloody British government. A paltry 27 attempts to address the issue over two years, and now – after the event mind you – they decide to admirably take a strong stance. Bunch of wusses.

    And as for Nick whatsisname hacking into US government defence sites (nice bit of conflation there)- well c’mon, he’s hyperactive or something, what do you expect? I distinctly remember that US announcement about frying him, I think. I’m touched that Diana remembers a bit about that story, but can’t be arsed to check his name on Google.

    She is clearly a moose’s mangey muff.

  20. on 30 Dec 2009 at 1:05 am Nelsons' Puppet

    So, all in all, not a bad year for a bunch of tossers spending what little spare time that they have slagging a load of strangers off.

    Nothing but onwards & upwards for 2010 guys.

    You may pull yourselves out of the cesspit by erm 2046.

    Happy New Year

  21. on 30 Dec 2009 at 1:11 am Joystons Choice

    NICK GRIFFIN HAS A GLASS EYE? You. Are. Shitting. Me.

    Completely unrelated to the topic in question but had me howling for a good 10 minutes.

    http://bit.ly/5YALdo

  22. on 30 Dec 2009 at 2:11 am Wayne

    In other news, there’s no mention of “shitprawn”. Sorry, Nelson.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/dec/30/2009-new-words-snollygosters-tweetups

  23. on 30 Dec 2009 at 3:40 am smurfette

    Blimey, I didn’t know you could get Firsts and PhDs in A-levels.

  24. on 30 Dec 2009 at 6:25 am Czardas

    I feel that Enzyme is being a little unfair towards Bob’s International Internet University, Illinois as I myself have several very good doctorates from that institution.

    I guess this comment will not get past the moderators. But I don’t care

  25. on 30 Dec 2009 at 11:05 am Rogue_Leader

    This sudo science

    Do you need root privs to do science these days?

    #>curl http://www.my.coat

  26. on 30 Dec 2009 at 11:33 am Rosie

    As a pioneer of teaching moral theory to children…

    Davidethics is Andy Kadir-Buxton and I claim my five pounds. Or he is Andy’s evil twin. In which case, I claim my £2.50.

  27. on 30 Dec 2009 at 11:49 am Rod Wrongnob

    [they] skin cats and dogs alive with no emotion at all

    Putting aside the hysterical racist bollocks aspect of this, one has to wonder how much extra Wendy Keelan would be prepared to pay for meat that has been lightly drizzled with the genuine salty tears of sympathetically emotional abattoir workers.

    And as I’m bored, davidethics:

    29-Aug-2009
    I have had the pleasure of teaching many splendid students over 70 years who have benefited themselves and the community

    20-Aug-2009
    I got a B and a D grade many years ago. Got a university place. Got a First and a PhD. Got a chair. Was admissions tutor in a prestigious university for 11 years …

    (A-levels were introduced in 1951.)

    21-Jul-2009
    I was one of the fortunate working class children who won a place at the local grammar school [blahblahblah] and went on to complete a grammar school education where boys did science and girls did literature.

    Clearly he’s either a confused old codger or he’s a fucking liar. My money’s on both.

  28. on 30 Dec 2009 at 1:34 pm Pirate Pete

    I think it’s very mean-spirited to compare davidethics to Andy Kadir-Buxton. Andy is a wonderfully insane free-thinker who wants to change the world for the better, while davidethics is just a cunt…

  29. on 30 Dec 2009 at 1:44 pm Rosie

    @ Pirate Pete – a batshit mental cunt at that. Perhaps brother Andy could box his ears and make him all better.

  30. on 30 Dec 2009 at 6:59 pm McCeldry

    Fuck me.

    He takes moderation martyrdom to a whole new level.

  31. on 31 Dec 2009 at 2:18 pm Phil H

    Nothing is as beautiful as people openly debating how there’s no freedom of speech any more:

    30-Dec-2009 11:56
    I would like to see politicians and the public debate free speech, which seems to be under threat.
    To avoid yet another rejection I will grovel to the moderators who are doing a wonderful job of moderating bad comments and protecting the world from abuse.

    Yeah, change tactics and compliment the moderators. Maybe then they’ll finally publish one of your comments.

    Oh, wait…

  32. on 31 Dec 2009 at 10:05 pm Dave

    What a cunt.