Comments on: Mum! Look Mum! I’m Being Apathetic! MUUUUMM!

By: Bluster Kreaton

Bluster Kreaton — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:56:28 +0000

@Silent Koala who on the 16th February 2010 at 12:49 pm said:

“You know, about gays and forrins and cancer and such.”

Upon reading your post I immediately recognised the word forrins as a word that I had heard somewhere before. Not content with just knowing that I knew it, I – using a famous search engine – looked it up.

The resultant list, while not very illuminating, did point to an error on you part however (which is what I’d thought all along). It is spelt Forin and is a “dynamic future orientated provider of industrial components and services”.

I hope you will be more aware of you errors in the future.

Sincerely,

Bluster Kreaton BA

By: Have Your Lurk

Have Your Lurk — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:10:04 +0000

No! NOOOOOO!!!! That comment was supposed to come up on a DIFFERENT DEBATE! (I’ll leave it as an exercise for the reader to figure out which one.)

By: Have Your Lurk

Have Your Lurk — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:08:51 +0000

Can your penis become, ummm, a giant squid, for example? With twelve or twenty appendages, and covered in toothed suckers, etc.? What are you putting in the bathwater, exactly…?

By: A Pedant

A Pedant — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:06:49 +0000

Rather her than her bloody sister?

Are you perhaps thinking of her Aunt, the Duchess of Cornwall?

Make mine a limp burrito.

By: whatever

whatever — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:05:30 +0000

“Emma Parker Bowles … bent over the bonnet of a car … sweating and swearing”

Rather her than her bloody sister?

By: Lurker in a Burka

Lurker in a Burka — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:33:29 +0000

All the HYSers frothing at their fetid anuses and getting in an awful tizz about the Beeb removing their precious recommend button are just bemoaning the fact that they now won’t get their daily dose of misguided self-importance. They covet their posts being recommended by other illiterate right wing fucksticks because it reinforces their bizarre belief that the geyser of molten effluence they spout out of their repugnant mouths via their no-doubt rancid, shit-stained fingers is actually being taken on board by someone, somewhere, who can’t just tell them to fuck off, which is what would happen if they tried saying most of this cack at a bus stop full of strangers. Without being able to tell how many people have read, and agreed, with their bilious bullshittery their on-line (and probably off-line) life has no meaning any more.

So, errr, any chance of a recommend button being introduced on here?

By: Timberley

Timberley — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:55:37 +0000

I read the article and was particularly impressed by the way this young lady has tried to fit in…

“Now my lunch consists of sitting on a pile of tyres and devouring a limp burrito.” (above a picture captioned “Earning respect: Emma with her Mexican workmates Francisco, left, and Jamie”)

“I spend a lot of time fetching tools like an eager dog – and there has been a lot of standing over the tool storage unit in a sweat, trying to find the right-sized socket.
”

Phnarrr phnarrr!
…and she says she hasn’t made it in Hollywood!

By: TomTom

TomTom — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:22:44 +0000

My tricks are to, if possible, get into the debate at the earliest and structure my comment based on what I feel is the ‘pulse’ of public opinion while projecting my viewpoint at the same time. I give my comment a boost of 3 to 5 votes in the beginning (and that too only if required) and then it just gets ’swept up’ if my reading of the ‘pulse’ has been correct!

For fucking fuck’s fucking sake.
It’s bad enough that these people want so badly to share their shit opinions with the world. But when it’s not even their real opinion, merely their impression of what other people will think, and they only bother in order to get as many recommendations as possible… I actually feel a bit sorry for this guy.

By: Bugrat

Bugrat — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:06:08 +0000

..based on what I feel is the ‘pulse’ of public opinion..

Oh my giddy fucking aunt. And I guess he regards boosting comments with sock-puppet accounts as merely a kind of refinement or distillation of ‘public opinion’.

By: Pierre De La Resistance

Pierre De La Resistance — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:41:18 +0000

71. At 09:10am on 16 Feb 2010, Max_Mahajan wrote:
Re: 67 goldCaesar

No offence taken! I definitley don’t have 50, or 100, or 200 or 300 or 400 different user names. (Anyway my long alpha-numeric password prohibits me from typing it 100′s of times and I don’t use ‘Remember Me’ on any computer.) I have precisely ten but I use them effectively and they’re not ‘dummy’ user names as I post under them. You can see my ‘User profile’ and you will see my posts with anything from zero to 300+ recommendations.

My tricks are to, if possible, get into the debate at the earliest and structure my comment based on what I feel is the ‘pulse’ of public opinion while projecting my viewpoint at the same time. I give my comment a boost of 3 to 5 votes in the beginning (and that too only if required) and then it just gets ‘swept up’ if my reading of the ‘pulse’ has been correct! Otherwise it languishes on whatever page….

The twonk goes on but I like the fact that he evidently has no comprehension of how it might be dubious to do it. At least he is honest about his lies.

And, personally, I’m pretty sure that any name he uses is going to be a dummy’s name.