Curtain Twitchers and Permanently Bewildered and Self-appointed Sages and Shit Sherlocks01 Jul 2010 07:30 am
By Gainsbourg

Hey, kids. Remember the 1980s revival a few years back? Well, here it is again, this time with added social realism. Just as George Osborne is getting ready to make 1.3 million people unemployed, the government is going to sew up disability benefits so tightly that only limbless, headless torsos and brains in jars will qualify. Honestly, it’s like punk only just happened!

But what do the spluttering breadheads at This Is Money think? Go on, guess.

Thanks to Ken.

Quite right too.
Recently I followed a couple of people after they had signed on for their job seekers dole and found that 5 of them were actually working,one guy as a betting shop manager only yards from the dole office he uses.Time to stop these spongers.
R Markson, Manchester

Ladies. Can you make out that figure over there, crouching in the bushes outside your house? That’s R Markson. But don’t worry! He’s only making sure you don’t commit any benefit fraud or anything. Just act like he’s not there. Don’t you normally do some stretches about this time?

The labour party paid out beefits willy nilly only to buy votes
Mike, Penzance

I remember when the Labour party came round offering me beefits concealed in a discreet brown envelope. But I was smart. I told them I couldn’t promise to vote for them, although I might after a little more persuasion. Well, they were dropping by twice a week after that, right up to polling day. Now I can’t move for fucking beefits. They’re making my life hell. Please help me.

It’s interesting that people say there aren’t enough jobs to go round, yet half a million Poles showed up here a couple of years back and found work immediately – for example working in the chicken factory in Llanelli, or picking cabbages in Essex. When I was chucked out of a high-paying job twenty-five years ago I spent 3 months driving trucks, stacking paint in warehouses, and shifting furniture for LESS than I would have got on the rock’n'roll (since I had a wife and two kids). At the end of that period I still couldn’t find a job so I started my own business, working out of the back bedroom.

That’s where the jobs come from, chaps. Once you go on benefits, you’ll never get off again – starter jobs always pay less.
Jim Blythe, Cardiff

Yeah, scumbags, that’s where the jobs come from – Jim’s back bedroom, where you’ll find a low-resolution video camera, three barrels of vegetable oil and a pile of beefits that goes all the way up to the ceiling. Apply in writing, with photo. No time wasters.

Is it me or have i started seeing things,since the chancellor anounced he is going to start cutting incapacity benefit, there has has been a sudden surge in wheelchairs and walking sticks? from people who look like they do not need them ?? two words spring to mind – CON ARTISTS..
Michael, lancs

Personally, Michael, I think you’re fucking cracked. But it would be a suspicious coincidence, wouldn’t it? The Treasury announces a crackdown on benefit fraud, so naturally a load of people go out and commit benefit fraud. It makes perfect sense when you don’t think about it.

yeah bring it on, but i don’t think it will happen, there isn’t any jobs anyway,unless we send all immigrant s home that wouldn’t b a bad thing,british jobs for english workers
N Thatcher, bath

Nargaret is going all-out imperialistic on us. British jobs for English workers. So fuck you, the Scottish! Get out, Welshers, this call centre is ours now! Nice restaurant you’ve got here, Irish. Be a terrible shame if it suddenly got taken over by the English. Whoops, butterfingers!

Don’t just cut benefits, reduce the number of benefits there are – housing benefit/local housing allowance should be combined with jobseekers allowance instead of administered separately. If people can’t be trusted to pay their rent themselves, that’s their problem.

Privatise Jobcentre Plus, and make its staff behave like recruitment consultants driven by targets – and scrap the useless Pathways to Work scheme – there is nothing that they can’t do that can’t be done by jobclubs.
Merge or shut down most universities (especially ex-polytechnics) and make companies take on apprentices. One family friend started work as an articled clerk and retired as a circuit judge – we need to return to that instead of lumbering people with student debts for useless degrees.
Jobseeker, South London

I can see what Jobseeker did here. Having demanded an unworkable oversimplification of our complex system of benefits, and called for Jobcentre staff to effectively retrain as recruitment consultants – because we need more of them in the world – Jobseeker (who I’m going to assume is a man because I’m a dreadful misandrist) read back his post and, being an utter fucking cockslap, thought to himself, “no, this is far too reasonable. What can I do to make myself seem even more insanely rightwing and stupid? Ah, I know: ‘shut down most universities.’ High five!”

85 Responses to “Stalking For A Fairer Britain”

  1. on 01 Jul 2010 at 8:29 am Rumpleforeskin

    To give credit to our friend Michael from Lancashire, he does begin his wordspunk by saying “Is it me or am I seeing things” implying that he acknowledges he’s a stark raving mentaller and that the “sudden surge in wheelchairs and walking sticks” is indeed his brain projecting a terrifying image of sentient disability-devices marching on his heavily protected fortress (read: semi-detached home with a pointless gate) a la “The Wall”…

  2. on 01 Jul 2010 at 8:29 am PhyllisStein

    How many of those fucking mouth breathers work themselves I wonder.

  3. on 01 Jul 2010 at 8:31 am Have Your Lurk

    half a million Poles showed up here a couple of years back and found work immediately – for example working in the chicken factory in Llanelli, or picking cabbages in Essex

    I’m pretty sure that would have made the news. Half a million Poles marching about in formation and all descending at once upon a chicken factory to do some simple manual labour would hardly pass unnoticed. Plus I imagine there isn’t a single cabbage left in Essex.

  4. on 01 Jul 2010 at 8:32 am Any Rand will do

    One family friend started work as an articled clerk and retired as a circuit judge – we need to return to that

    When I was a lad I served a term as “office boy” to an attorney’s firm. I cleaned the windows and I swept the floor, and then I was made redundant.

  5. on 01 Jul 2010 at 8:45 am Bob Bobsons

    R Markson has unwittingly uncovered an eeeeevil scheme by these eeeeeevil dole scroungers, but failed to notice the true extent of the horror. He began watching two people, then discovered that five of the two were actually working. That means that 250% of people on benefits are cheating the system and/or can clone themselves at will. (Lucky Will).

  6. on 01 Jul 2010 at 8:51 am Tegid

    @ Any Rand will do

    I Lolled out loud because I got that straight away.

    and then I felt very sad for knowing it so well…

  7. on 01 Jul 2010 at 9:28 am My Pockets Hurt

    Are beefits like Chewits, only made out of cows?

  8. on 01 Jul 2010 at 9:52 am Col John Matrix

    “british jobs for english workers”

    English bastards, coming over here and stealing our jobs and our wimmen!

    I liked Jobseeker’s plan to shut down most universities and make all these unemployed students and staff members get proper jobs. Where are these hundreds of thousands of jobs going to appear from? Fucking Narnia?

  9. on 01 Jul 2010 at 9:55 am Jones

    a pile of beefits that goes all the way up to the ceiling

    At this point I was no longer able to pretend I was reading serious work-related stuff.

  10. on 01 Jul 2010 at 10:14 am Admiral Felch

    Jobseeker may actually be very cleverly subverting the dribblers’ discourse by nodding and dribbling in time so he can quietly slip in a sentence that isn’t complete poo (apprentices). On the other hand he may be a fan of the telly show “The Apprentice” likes the idea of lots of little Alan Sugars being raised in corporate breeding dens. (I’ve just made myself ill by writing that). Or maybe just his nappy needs changing?

    @ Have your lurk – Essex is still full of cabbages (brassica waynus), and slugs (gastropodus traceya); the Poles are smart enough not to touch them.

  11. on 01 Jul 2010 at 10:23 am I hate my life

    Wiser than you’s vision for a Better britain:

    1. Abolition of capital gains tax
    2. Increase in the threshold of inheritance tax to £1m
    3. Reversal of the rate-taper on income tax for those earning above
    £50k; so, for example, a marginal rate of 0% to apply for income above £100k
    4. Abolition of National Insurance (as it is just tax by another name,
    with the Labour fraud that suggests to their stupid supporters that it
    is a pot of money set aside for the taxpayer, not realising that it is
    no such thing) as a simplification measure
    5. Trebling of duties on booze and fags; reduction of fuel duties.
    6. Staggered cancellation of all benefits payments, compulsory
    reassessment of all health-related benefits by Armed Forces doctors.
    Funding for soup kitchens and dormitory hostels.
    7. Cancellation of all pension arrangements for public servants
    8. Sacking of 50-60% of all public sector employees without compensation
    and a prohibition on their ever receiving any state benefit; the
    remainder should have pay cuts (e.g., doctors need a 75% cut to
    compensate for the enormous gift they had due to Labour’s criminal
    incompetence)
    9. Funding for examination of the use of POCA (Proceeds of Crime Act)
    against all members and ex-members of the Labour government with a view
    to confiscation of all their assets
    10. Funding for re-examination of all those granted residence visas and
    citizenship since 1997; immediate deportation of all those found to have
    falsified or exaggerated or concealed anything in their applications
    11. Abolition of corporation tax
    12. Increase the VAT rate to 30% to fund all the above; it is
    over-consumption that ruins the planet, so VAT is the appropriate tool.
    Tax damage, not brains or hard work.

    That’ll do for a start.
    Wiser than you

    Jesus.

  12. on 01 Jul 2010 at 10:33 am BimmsWane

    13. Complimentary and compulsory euthanasia for HYS commenters with dangerously retarded ideas.

  13. on 01 Jul 2010 at 10:42 am Albert Angelo

    Good grief! Wiser than you’s cuntishness is so massive it must be visible from space.

  14. on 01 Jul 2010 at 10:56 am Alex

    I love JobSeekers analogy about the Circuit Judge as he sadly misses the point that the at the very least the Judge would have had a high 2.1 in Law. Salt of the earth he was!!! No poncy degree for him.

  15. on 01 Jul 2010 at 10:56 am tw@basket.com

    I am all for reducing waste so lets see if we can get that bloated list of 12 points consolidated down a bit:

    1. Abolish all taxes that I pay, or rather abolish all taxes that I wish I was rich enough to pay, because my finances don’t actually match up to my delusional aspirations.
    2. Increase taxes on everybody else but particularly poor people and other people I have a grudge against.
    3. Sack public servants like that bastard social worker who sent me to my bastard GP who referred me to a bastard psychiatrist who diagnosed me, ME!, as a delusional, psychopathic piss pipe.

    See? That’s a 75% rationalisation. At this rate we will have the national debt paid off in no time.

  16. on 01 Jul 2010 at 10:59 am OutragedHareKrishna

    So, it was boat bacons yesterday and beefits today. I see through you, Catholic Church. I never believed you really went away. Well, we shall our lentil-powered revenge.

  17. on 01 Jul 2010 at 11:15 am Naich

    http://yourfreedom.hmg.gov.uk/repealing-unnecessary-laws/all_ideas?b_start:int=30&-C=

    The pointy-heads are starting to circle…

  18. on 01 Jul 2010 at 11:16 am Bored at Work

    @ tw@tbasket.com

    A psychopathic penguin’s putrid piss pipe, surely.

  19. on 01 Jul 2010 at 11:42 am Gruelling Turd

    I’m usually a mere lurker on here, but ‘Wiser than you’ has brought me out from under my rock.

    I want to find this man and plunge a screwdriver into his shitty little neck, taunting him as he gargles blood, until the last thing he sees is my perversely happy-angry-teethgrinding face.

    Anyway, must dash, toodle-oo all.

  20. on 01 Jul 2010 at 11:54 am Col John Matrix

    “5. Trebling of duties on booze and fags; reduction of fuel duties.”

    Looks like I’m going to have to start drinking petrol, then.

  21. on 01 Jul 2010 at 11:57 am Kris

    Hey, kids. Remember the 1980s revival a few years back? Well, here it is again, this time with added social realism.

    Hang on…you don’t mean…IT’S 1984 ALL OVER AGAIN?

  22. on 01 Jul 2010 at 12:31 pm The Toksvig Avenger

    If this is going to be the 1980′s returning for real then I’ve got no problem with:
    (a) Shitting myself;
    (b) Sucking on Duplo;
    (c) Having a sexual attraction to Danger Mouse

    Happy Days

  23. on 01 Jul 2010 at 12:34 pm Brimswen

    @Natch

    I’m undecided about this. On the one hand, as long as you can vote ideas down as well as up, I think it’s quite a good idea. However, I suspect that the only people who will actually participate will be the HYS crowd and freshly-rallied Daily Mail readers.

    What do you think? Will you be participating?

  24. on 01 Jul 2010 at 12:41 pm Antigone

    Jobseeker is totally right. We absolutely should “make” companies take on an apprentice. And then “make” would-be poly graduates dream of becoming a judge while they “make” the tea. It’s a fair system.

  25. on 01 Jul 2010 at 12:43 pm Brimswen

    Uh oh. Well, I’m rapidly becoming decided about the yourfreedom site, which is currently groaning under the strain of facilitating so much autofellatio.

    From “Remove the right of councils to put obstacles in roads designed to curb speeding.”:

    Speed humps:
    * Waste fuel as drivers speed up and brake hard between humps.
    * Harm the environment due to the additional energy used in speeding up and slowing down.
    * Cause illegal and unnecessary wear on vehicle suspension / brakes.
    * Cause driver “fatigue” in which a driver is looking for the next hump rather than looking out for children playing at the side of a road.
    * Most are so large the actually PREVENT you from being able to achieve the legal speed limit.
    * They are put in roads at complete unncessary expense to the tax payer.
    * The are undemocratic as they prevent someone from being able to break the law and suffer the consequences – would we consider chopping off someone’s hands to prevent them stealing??
    * Cause unnecessary death by slowing down our emergency services.

  26. on 01 Jul 2010 at 12:49 pm Mrs The Toksvig Avenger

    (c) Having a sexual attraction to Danger Mouse

    It’s something they put into the Gregg’s Stakebake, hormones I think, anyways he was randy before we’d could get him out of his pushchair.. played havoc with the antimacassars I can tell you..

  27. on 01 Jul 2010 at 12:52 pm Sir (Prof) Alf Ramsey's Porn Dungeon

    * Cause driver “fatigue” in which a driver is looking for the next hump rather than looking out for children playing at the side of a road.

    … so he ran over a kid whilst having a wank driving through a red-light district?

  28. on 01 Jul 2010 at 1:18 pm Cougar Brent

    Stop annoying me HYL.

  29. on 01 Jul 2010 at 1:29 pm welsh boy

    Did anybody else read “wiser than you” as “considerably richer than you” (in mock brummy accent)?

  30. on 01 Jul 2010 at 1:35 pm christonabike

    The Poles post *is* quite funny. But I can imagine that for Nelson & crew, HYL’s OCD commentardism is like being followed round their house by a clingy, constantly shitting chimpanzee.

  31. on 01 Jul 2010 at 1:35 pm Front

    @Have Your Lurk

    Nobody cares what your spouting about, now sssshhhh.

  32. on 01 Jul 2010 at 1:41 pm dirigible

    Ever seen the paperwork you have to fill out to get incapacity benefit? Being able to complete it should disqualify you.

    Also, anyone bleating for everyone else to have a lower pension than them look just fill in the rest, I’m not going to insult you.

  33. on 01 Jul 2010 at 1:48 pm eleanora_

    I had a packet of beefits for lunch this morning, and mighty tasty they were too.

  34. on 01 Jul 2010 at 1:49 pm SoulBoy

    From HM Gov’s Your Freedom -

    Repeal the law of gravity, it is hindering space travel and hover cars.

    Why the contribution is important -
    we need hover cars

  35. on 01 Jul 2010 at 2:00 pm ad ho

    To get to the area where people sign on, R Markson would have to show his own signing card to security. How does he know the Betting Shop Manager wasn’t visiting the Jobcentre to fill a vacancy?

    I suppose picking holes is already granting him too much. But I would prefer to think he did enact some of the craziness he describes. It would put him in the scientific tradition of that bloke who sat in hospital corridors counting people; and this cunt.

  36. on 01 Jul 2010 at 2:15 pm Mouse

    So, Jobseeker, if we get rid of housing benefit, where will all the Jobseekers on Jobseeker’s Allowance live? Your house? You cunt.

    And, even though I’m essentially repeating Alex’s post, there’s no such thing as ‘articled clerks’ in the legal profession any more. If I could have qualified as a solicitor without having done a degree (no arguments about ILEX please) then I would have done, but that’s not the way it works you toad’s twisted twat!

  37. on 01 Jul 2010 at 2:17 pm Mouse

    Wow, my ILEX comment totally makes me sound like a dick when I see it in the thread. Apologies for that – argue away!

  38. on 01 Jul 2010 at 2:28 pm Nelson

    @christonabike: Yeah. I was blissfully ignorant of him until after I enabled the blah filter and he sent me a weird email assuming it was because of him. “Who?”, I thought. Then looked at the comments and found out. I feel like he’s been “invoked” now. So I’m just going to delete all the weirdo obsessive stuff until he sorts his brain out.

  39. on 01 Jul 2010 at 2:52 pm Rotwatcher

    I wasn’t around when the blah filter was enabled, so I wondered why it had been turned on. Was it sheer caprice, or was there an unwarranted outbreak of dialogue?

  40. on 01 Jul 2010 at 3:26 pm evilherbivore

    I have just had a trawl through the hmg website and dear fuck its depressing. Every self satified wank in the country seems to be trying to outdo every other one in an attempt to show how much of a pachyderms pendulous pudenda they are. Its crashing under the strain of twatbasketry

  41. on 01 Jul 2010 at 3:37 pm Brimswayne

    Every self satified wank in the country seems to be trying to outdo every other one in an attempt to show how much of a pachyderms pendulous pudenda they are.

    Yeah. In hindsight, it was naive to assume that it would be any different to Have Your Petition (which, incidentally, seems to be inactive now…perhaps the belief that you actually get to repeal something has attracted them all to Have Your Freedom?)

  42. on 01 Jul 2010 at 3:40 pm Nelson

    @Rotwatcher: I just browsed through and everything was full of fucking catchphrases and smug, rubbish in-jokes.

    Like an alternative version of HYS populated exclusively by sixth-formers from a Very Nice School.

  43. on 01 Jul 2010 at 4:09 pm Dennis Bloodnok

    Nelson: “Like an alternative version of HYS populated exclusively by sixth-formers from a Very Nice School.”

    I somehow doubt that SYB could ever manage the same levels of casual racism and arrogance.

  44. on 01 Jul 2010 at 4:36 pm Kris

    So I’m just going to delete all the weirdo obsessive stuff until he sorts his brain out.

    He’s got about 10 screen names. Mother fucker’s like a chameleon. But a really shite chameleon that has Tourrettes, so always gives itself away.

  45. on 01 Jul 2010 at 4:37 pm Nelson

    @Dennis: Shit off. This place manages arrogance HYS can only dream of.

  46. on 01 Jul 2010 at 4:50 pm Dave The Dog

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/haveyoursay/2010/07/what_laws_would_you_change.html

    If I were to quote every shitnugget of fucktardery in this thread I would probably break the internet.

    Enjoy crying.

  47. on 01 Jul 2010 at 5:20 pm Alex

    Mouse, essentially Jobseeker believes that the legal system just comprises of millions and millions of forms and judges letting paedophiles and rapists win the lottery so what is needed is a plethora of under trained clerks who have “world experience” as if living independently and going through Law School presents no difficulties at all.

  48. on 01 Jul 2010 at 5:40 pm Nelson

    Earlier today that “Your Freedom” site had an autoplay vid of Dickvid Claggeron. Think it broke their pipe. Haha. Autoplay media is shitty at the best of times.

    Maybe I’ll add some to the homepage here.

  49. on 01 Jul 2010 at 6:18 pm new scientist

    Just clicked on Dave the Dog’s link, and the very first thing I see, on the very first line of the very first comment, is this:

    so called Human Rightists

    So-called by whom, precisely??

    I couldn’t bear to read any further.

  50. on 01 Jul 2010 at 6:42 pm Mim

    Ever seen the paperwork you have to fill out to get incapacity benefit? Being able to complete it should disqualify you.

    Don’t worry, that seems to be roughly how they’re running ESA. And the mental health questions show that they’re already highly supicious of people who claim to be both ill and literate.

  51. on 01 Jul 2010 at 6:57 pm Ugeine

    The are undemocratic as they prevent someone from being able to break the law and suffer the consequences –

    I’ve been saying the same about rape whistles. They are undemocratic and stop someone from being able to break the law and suffer the consequences

    As I said to the person I was mugging the other day, who tried to use self defence to stop me from acting out my democratic right to stab him in the lung and steal his Ipod:

    WHAT IS THIS, COMMUNIST RUSSIA??

  52. on 01 Jul 2010 at 7:16 pm Kris

    Delroy

    ABOLISH ALL QUANGO’s

    I don’t know what they are, what they do, or how they work, but I saw the word in the same sentence as taxes and now I want them BANNED.

    krokodil

    Make every offence carry the death penalty. Would reduce offending rates!

    I swear I’ll never cycle on the pavement again.

    confusus

    Am the 100th or 1000th who recognises the idiocy of the “Human Rights Act?

    With this massive upswell of support, you should start your own party! With 1000 votes in a country of 65 million people, what can’t you achieve?

  53. on 01 Jul 2010 at 7:32 pm Hubert Cumberdale

    Privatise Jobcentre Plus, and make its staff behave like recruitment consultants driven by targets – and scrap the useless Pathways to Work scheme – there is nothing that they can’t do that can’t be done by jobclubs.
    Merge or shut down most universities (especially ex-polytechnics) and make companies take on apprentices. One family friend started work as an articled clerk and retired as a circuit judge – we need to return to that instead of lumbering people with student debts for useless degrees.
    Jobseeker, South London

    …except that Jobcentre Plus is already a privatized, and already runs on targets exactly like this, based on how many people they can place in employment. Of course this is not ideal if you’re an ethnic minority, over 40 or anyone else viewed as traditionally “difficult” to place. Still, I guess Jobseeker could be viewed in this regard as some what of a belated visionary. A career in management strategy awaits. Or maybe I’ll see him next week when I’m signing on.

  54. on 01 Jul 2010 at 7:33 pm Kris

    One more to stave off the boredom.

    Lewis Fitzroy

    The law that allows’ illegals and they familys to stay in The U.K

    Lewis Fitzroy, everybody. Poor chap doesn’t even know what illegal means.

  55. on 01 Jul 2010 at 8:41 pm Schroduck

    [Speed bumps] are undemocratic as they prevent someone from being able to break the law and suffer the consequences – would we consider chopping off someone’s hands to prevent them stealing??

    Goddamnit, does this mean I’m going to have to take the locks off my front door?

  56. on 01 Jul 2010 at 8:50 pm passerby bloke

    Of course, R Markson has a point. It’s the same point you have when you say, “if we starve 95% of humanity to death, the 5% of survivors will have access to more food”.

    Otherwise, he’s still a twatbasket.

  57. on 01 Jul 2010 at 9:44 pm [NutterBrackets]

    Welcome to the brave new world of democracy driven by personality disorder.

  58. on 01 Jul 2010 at 10:14 pm Twatbasket in a plane

    Can someone briefly explain to me the anti have your lurk sentiment, i fail to see the issue with him, its not like he’s another Adair or a Craig is it?
    IS IT??????????

  59. on 01 Jul 2010 at 10:17 pm helen_s

    Look, you’re all getting this wrong. A beefit is a special bee you get in a reinforced envelope. You put it in a fishtank and shine strobe lights in its bee eyes, and it has a seizure. It’s, like, really REALLY funny (if you’re a haver of your say).

  60. on 01 Jul 2010 at 10:31 pm Ugeine

    …Until it gets BANNED by so called ‘animal rightists’ no doubt.

  61. on 01 Jul 2010 at 10:56 pm Kris

    @Twatbasket

    I actually liked him, in the way you might like Jedward or Zane Lowe; you know how annoying they are, but they’re so energetic and sincere that you find it difficult to despise them.

  62. on 02 Jul 2010 at 12:06 am bolli

    How does merging Housing Benefit into JSA decrease how much it costs?
    Oh, and it is good to know that Michael, Lancs can diagnose someone’s mobility problems by looking at them – this is an amazing superpower and could save the NHS a fortune in pricey MRIs like the one they needed to diagnose my MS.

  63. on 02 Jul 2010 at 12:23 am Mim

    HYL didn’t even annoy me. Am I doing it wrong?

  64. on 02 Jul 2010 at 12:42 am Dizzy

    dirigible

    Ever seen the paperwork you have to fill out to get incapacity benefit? Being able to complete it should disqualify you.

    Except that you don’t have to fill anything in for the application, and you shouldn’t for the successor, either. It was decided that you should be doing it all over the phone to 1) decrease the amount of time taken to get your application in, 2) decrease the risk of having mistakes all over the forms, thus delaying the application, 3) streamline the process so it involves less staff at every point and 4) offer out some juicy private sector contracts while they’re at it.

    By the way, this:

    Hubert Cumberdale

    Privatise Jobcentre Plus, and make its staff behave like recruitment consultants driven by targets – and scrap the useless Pathways to Work scheme – there is nothing that they can’t do that can’t be done by jobclubs.
    Merge or shut down most universities (especially ex-polytechnics) and make companies take on apprentices. One family friend started work as an articled clerk and retired as a circuit judge – we need to return to that instead of lumbering people with student debts for useless degrees.
    Jobseeker, South London

    …except that Jobcentre Plus is already a privatized, and already runs on targets exactly like this, based on how many people they can place in employment. Of course this is not ideal if you’re an ethnic minority, over 40 or anyone else viewed as traditionally “difficult” to place. Still, I guess Jobseeker could be viewed in this regard as some what of a belated visionary. A career in management strategy awaits. Or maybe I’ll see him next week when I’m signing on.

    is the kind of sixth form knobjockery I could very much do without.

  65. on 02 Jul 2010 at 5:40 am I'm outraged. Are you implying the site is worthless without comments???

    @Mim

    HYL didn’t even annoy me. Am I doing it wrong?

    Mim, if you’re not filled with impotent soft-left-wing rage almost at random, then yes, you’re doing it wrong.

    For practice, look at this webpage, and at the bottom imagine the text for one of the checkboxes says “blah filter”. Randomly click it over and over. Feel the raw, sexual power flood your thin, watery veins.

  66. on 02 Jul 2010 at 6:50 am Marx & Sparx

    helen_s
    You’ve still got it wrong, it was a typo, he meant beeftits, he’s blaming Labour for the rise moobs.

  67. on 02 Jul 2010 at 7:41 am Mirelurk

    I knew this ‘what law don’t you like’ bollocks was going to be a goldmine. From ‘joesmith’:

    In days of DNA tests where the uncertainty of doubt is so small (it is not even worth considering) the death penatly law should be repealed and bought back on the statute books for the following crimes:

    Murder

    Child pornograhy

    Any one who is detained at her majesty’s please in secure hopitals who have commited murder inclusing serial killers.

    It should be a back dated so for the like of Ian Brady the state can be releaved of the duty of care and the expense for the rest of his life

    Please, please, PLEASE can I tell Joe Smith that the death penalty and retrospective legislation are outlawed by the Human Rights Act? PLEEEEASE?

  68. on 02 Jul 2010 at 7:48 am Mirelurk

    Holy hippo’s hard-on, you can comment on them as well! See you in a year…

  69. on 02 Jul 2010 at 9:48 am Kris

    @Mirelurk

    Don’t do it! That way lies madness, and boredom, swiftly followed by impotent despair.

  70. on 02 Jul 2010 at 10:20 am Mirelurk

    I’m already mad, bored and a little bit despairing. And impotent. But I’m not actually commenting, just laughing at teh stupid who do. Once you scratch the surface, it’s not actually as good as I thought. Most people don’t know the meaning of the word ‘repeal’.

  71. on 02 Jul 2010 at 12:11 pm Ugly Newt

    I swear I’ll never cycle on the pavement again.

    You’ve made this small, squishable amphibian slightly happier. Unfortunately, there’s another suggestion on the yourfreedom site asking not only to repeal the 19th-century law against it, but to make it compulsory – presumably from someone who drives door-to-door and has never set foot on a pavement.

  72. on 02 Jul 2010 at 12:22 pm Have Your Lurk (Every Post Now With A Point... Guaranteed!)

    The law that allows’ illegals and they familys to stay in The U.K

    Lewis Fitzroy, everybody. Poor chap doesn’t even know what illegal means.

    It’s the apostrophe that strikes me. Allows’. It is proof of a little learning being a very bad thing. Lewis is aware that the apostrophe exists, and that it is often sighted in the wild humping the letter S, sometimes in a sort of love-sandwich thing between two Ss, plus he probably once saw someone on the bus reading Lyn Truss.

    This is really rather subtle. He knows it’s important, but has not the first clue why, or what to do with it. A bit like television licences. If you’ve got an S, you need a ‘.

  73. on 02 Jul 2010 at 1:10 pm here for the playground humour

    Holy hippo’s hard-on

    Tee hee

  74. on 02 Jul 2010 at 1:11 pm here for the playground humour

    ha ha! Get me with my first block quote.
    So proud

  75. on 02 Jul 2010 at 1:18 pm Have Your Lurk (Every Post Now With A Point... Guaranteed!)

    The are undemocratic as they prevent someone from being able to break the law and suffer the consequences

    Mmm. And Nelson putting the blah filter on is preventing me from being able to act like a twat with OCD and Tourette’s* and then suffer the consequences.

    *Note the correct spelling, please, whoever got this wrong above.

    (Yes, Nelson, you can delete this one. Look, it’s hard to change, all right? I’ll get there eventually.)

  76. on 02 Jul 2010 at 1:28 pm Bored at Work

    John Adair, kicking someone called Hugh into a hole. Or kicking a hole in someone called Hugh.

    I would kick everyone whose parents/grandparents were not living/resident in the UK during or before WW2. This would create a hugh hole in the employment market, which could be filled by our 5 million unemployed. The savings in welfare payments (HUGH) could be used to decrease taxes and fund any training (Doctors/nurses/IT consultants etc).
    The resultant full employment would reduce crime and poverty, freeing up prison space to house the real criminals in this country, the bankers and politicians.

    Jobs a good one!!!!

  77. on 02 Jul 2010 at 2:20 pm Sheepless

    The savings in welfare payments (HUGH) could be used to decrease taxes and fund any training (Doctors/nurses/IT consultants etc).

    From which we can deduce that the writer is an IT consultant – if you can call asking “have you tried turning it off and on again” consultancy.

  78. on 02 Jul 2010 at 2:30 pm tw@basket.com

    What idiot decided to make the “contributions” to the law repeal consultation visible and commentable? That was obviously only going to attract a nasty little community of like-minded wankers, as you get on all websites with comments, er, except this one, obviously.

    How on earth are the government’s minions meant to find the one or two serious, reasoned suggestions under all that pointless posturing and verbiage?

    Still, at least the poor civil servants will have the odd laugh as they wade through the wank:

    B: “Oh, I say! Come and have a look at this one Sir Humphrey.”
    H: “What is it Bernard?”
    B: “A ghastly oik called Adair. Apparently he thinks we can solve unemployment by deporting half of the economy and somebody called Hugh.”
    H: “Oh dear. That is a choice nugget of ordure you have found. Send a copy to Nick Clegg. It should put him off any future attempts at consultation.”
    B: “Yes,Sir Humphrey.”

    Nelson: Don’t be surprised when you get a call from senior civil servant, or maybe even a government minister, some time in the next few days asking you to show him how the the Blah Filter works. Don’t let him give you any crap about the national debt and tight departmental budgets. Make him pay full price for consultancy. He will willingly pay whatever you ask.

  79. on 02 Jul 2010 at 2:51 pm Jim

    Time to teach Nick Clegg a lesson and flood Have Your Freedom with content ripped from the Twat-o-Tron.

    There is a tiny chance of this backfiring, and some of the Twat-o-Tron’s suggestions making it unedited into an Act of Parliament, but it is a worthwhile risk.

  80. on 02 Jul 2010 at 4:09 pm Bugrat

    How on earth are the government’s minions meant to find the one or two serious, reasoned suggestions under all that pointless posturing and verbiage?

    Still, at least the poor civil servants will have the odd laugh as they wade through the wank..

    Pretty sure its sole purpose is to act as a lightning conductor for the brainfart brigade. If they send their drivel there, they’re less likely to be sending it to the beeb or to their local MP.

    I notice that the freedom website appears to have congealed..

  81. on 02 Jul 2010 at 5:13 pm Ugly Newt

    B: “Oh, I say! Come and have a look at this one Sir Humphrey.”
    H: “What is it Bernard?”
    B: “A ghastly oik called Adair. Apparently he thinks we can solve unemployment by deporting half of the economy and somebody called Hugh.”
    H: “Oh dear. That is a choice nugget of ordure you have found.”

    Reading too fast, I thought that was another of those HYS escapees who drop in to point out how smug and elitist we are.

  82. on 02 Jul 2010 at 5:33 pm Sheepless

    If I were to send a Freedom of Information request asking how much the yourfreedom website cost, do you think I’d get an answer?

  83. on 02 Jul 2010 at 6:52 pm Oddtwang

    @sheepless: Nah, FOI is first on the “To Repeal” pile – they’re going to make it retroactive too, once they’ve invented those mind wiping things from Men In Black.

  84. on 10 Jul 2010 at 8:18 am Goomounse

    blah blah barble blah warble blarb blahdy barble baa baa barble blahdy blah blah blah blahdy blahdy warble blah.blah blahdy warble blahdy blah blah!! blahdy blahdy blah.blah.blah Herea blah blarb blarb blah blah warble blarb blahdy warble blah blahdy.blahdy.blahdy.blahdy

  85. on 10 Jul 2010 at 1:30 pm ian

    warble baa my blarb blah blah blahdy blah blah hurts.