Miscellaneous Prats and Self-appointed Sages05 Jul 2010 07:30 am
By Gainsbourg

What’s more depressing than the Daily Mail? The Daily Mail taking the moral high ground from the BBC, that’s what.

When commentator David Mercer said something during the Wimbledon coverage about some supposed “puppy fat” on this year’s paedo’s choice Laura Robson, the Mail called him out on it. With a straight face and everything. Literally tens of people rushed to voice the same two opinions (bad Mercer/good Mercer), and Jo brought this silly prick to our attention.

Sorry but I completely AGREE with Mercer’s comments.
ALOT of the female tennis players now are carrying TOO MUCH weight! You cannot say its “puppy fat” thats an old wives tale!
I can never recall Chris Evert, Billie Jean King or Martina Navratilova carrying a spare tyre of fat around their middle??
The men done have spare tyres do they?
Sorry but the girls are not fit – hence all these little screams when hitting the ball etc…..
Samantha Jane, East Sussex

Samantha artfully tops and tails this dripping pisstowel of unpleasantness with two shining examples of the arsehole’s apology. It’s the apology that isn’t an apology, the brother of ‘not being funny, right’. What it means is: “I deeply regret doing or saying what I’m about to do or say, but not enough to actually refrain from doing or saying it. I’m basically a complete failure of a human being with an overinflated sense of entitlement; nonetheless, I shall deign to consider your pathetic feelings by prefixing the following cuntery with the word ‘sorry’, then you can all go, ‘that Samantha is harsh but unfailingly correct. And I tell you what, she’s certainly magnanimous in victory. I wish I could be more like her, rather than considerate and well-liked’.”

So female pro-tennis players: consider yourselves told, right? Fucking screaming barrels.

53 Responses to “Pennis”

  1. on 05 Jul 2010 at 8:44 am Sheepless

    This is obviously not the same Daily Mail which has been perving over the shortness of the players’ skirts. That Daily Mail would be unable to anyone else commenting on a player’s body.

  2. on 05 Jul 2010 at 8:52 am Theodore

    Now if I were a cynical person (which I am obviously not, being a SYB reader) I would guess that Samantha Jane is a pen name for somebody called Eric (or similar). Either that or Samantha is an anorexic, failed tennis player.

    In his/her defense, I would like to say that his/her deviation from the norms of English grammar and spelling was most inventive.

  3. on 05 Jul 2010 at 9:01 am Dizzy

    I like it when they grunt.

  4. on 05 Jul 2010 at 9:32 am Col. Richard Hindrance (Mrs), VC, DSO and Bar Six, KitKat, Trio

    I make no apology for what I have to write. I’m sorry, but I don’t.

  5. on 05 Jul 2010 at 9:34 am Bum

    What is this “tennis”?

  6. on 05 Jul 2010 at 9:50 am Jones

    I wonder what Samantha thought when those rumours of Daniella Hantuchova being anorexic were floating around.

  7. on 05 Jul 2010 at 9:55 am Brimswan

    Does anyone know if there’s a catalogue of Daily Mail hypocrisy? I’d love to see some of their stories side-by-side. I remember a great example (perhaps found by Charlie Brooker, I can’t remember) of them reeling off their typical anti-paedo spiel just a page or two away from a photo of Hermione (Emma) Granger (Watson) with some suggestive comments underneath. It was at a time when she was particularly borderline RE: age of consent.

    It’s hard to believe that they don’t do these things deliberately.

  8. on 05 Jul 2010 at 9:57 am tw@basket.com

    Sod tennis. Bring back kabaddi, That is a proper sport with several big advantages over other major televised sports:

    1. Players have to hold their breath, so it can’t go on for three days without anybody winning.
    2. You can’t complain about the players making silly noises because it is in the rules that they have to.
    3. England doesn’t play it, so we can’t lose at it.

  9. on 05 Jul 2010 at 10:56 am Dizzy

    Jones

    I wonder what Samantha thought when those rumours of Daniella Hantuchova being anorexic were floating around.

    “Bitch is too fat anyway”?

    Brimswan

    Does anyone know if there’s a catalogue of Daily Mail hypocrisy?

    Not as exhaustive as you might like, but try this.

  10. on 05 Jul 2010 at 11:12 am pigfrottage

    It’s almost as though being able to run about for a while helps you to be good at tennis. You couldn’t make it up.

  11. on 05 Jul 2010 at 11:44 am [NutterBrackets]

    Where can I buy one of these dripping pisstowels?

  12. on 05 Jul 2010 at 12:03 pm 773 (metric)

    Brimswan, this is the finest example of them all. On the right, missing-the-point-by-a-light-year outrage at Brass Eye’s Paedo Special. On the left, a ‘Phwoar, look at the size of 15 year old Charlotte Church’s tits’.

    Mentioned in the article, but not shown, the Daily Mail’s reaction to ‘sick filth’ Brass Eye (again, utterly missing the point) directly opposite close-up pictures of bikini-clad Princesses Beatrice (13) and Eugenie (11).

  13. on 05 Jul 2010 at 12:18 pm Dean Cramvoid

    Brimswan, also enemiesofreason.

    “Sorry, but…” is a pretty reliable marker on opinion journalism as well. It says that the following piece contains some fatuous contrarianism that pretends to be brave consensus-busting but actually panders to the interests of the government or big business or some other powerful institution.

  14. on 05 Jul 2010 at 12:50 pm Sheepless

    Uh, I see that my comment up there makes no fucking sense, because of my habit of omitting some of the. Oh well, you get the idea.

    I’ve always read the “sorry but” opener as shorthand for “I hope to cause offence with the following; in fact, I’ll be a little disappointed it nobody is upset”.

  15. on 05 Jul 2010 at 1:23 pm RT

    @Brimswan: I’m a big fan of tabloid-watch.blogspot.com.

    @Sheepless, Dean Cramvoid, “Sorry, but” is kind of like saying “It may not be politically-correct to say it, but…” which actually means that it is very politically-correct in that it is a statement which usually panders to some populist notion, but by starting it off that way makes it, as you said,

    fatuous contrarianism that pretends to be brave consensus-busting but actually panders to the interests of the government or big business or some other powerful institution, which hopes to cause offence and in fact, it would be a little disappointing if it nobody is upset

    (I liked both your explanations, and thought they could be combined into some kind of awesome monster denunciation of the tedious, wannabe-controversialist wankers who write this kind of shit)

  16. on 05 Jul 2010 at 1:36 pm Barmswin

    @Dizzy

    Thanks. That’s amazing.

    @773

    Thanks. That’s also amazing. It even contains a quote from someone outraged about Channel 4 saying “Their double standards are totally incomprehensible”.

    @Dean

    Thanks. That site’s down just now, but the google cache isn’t, and it’s amazing. After reading a few I do get the impression that his cause is completely futile, especially when he expands his target to include gossip mags.

  17. on 05 Jul 2010 at 2:34 pm Turd Mannerism II

    Each Teacher should have an assessor in their class 7 times a year but without

    them knowing, they will be assessed that day! The assessor is to be there all

    day. And for a different time of the year, 7 times the same assessor is to

    check the students work/books/projects etc.If then it is noted that their work

    & the students work is below 90% then the Teacher is to go on a refresher

    course! Seven months later approx. the Assessor is to be with the Teacher

    again, if still no improvement, then its TIME THEY WENT!

    EBAYTKMAX, on “should scrounging teachers be sacked for incompetence?”. The best bit of it: ebaytkmax has left it double spaced. When we print it off, we can write our notes between the lines.

  18. on 05 Jul 2010 at 2:44 pm Kris

    Here at the Mail, we find it DISGUSTING and voyeuristic that the BBC keeps turning the cameras to female audience members during the tennis. To help you get over your nigh inconsolable rage, have some photos that we took up Miley Cyrus’ skirt, and listen to us blather on and on about Christine Bleakley one minute, then call her a fame hungry vulture the next.

    My shite laptop is broken so I’m on shite mobile internet, but has anyone mentioned Angry Mob or Daily Quail yet in regards to Mail/Express-centric websites. Quail is finished now but the archive is luvverly.
    I’d link to them, but I’m sure you can handle googling it.

  19. on 05 Jul 2010 at 3:15 pm Sheepless

    Will the class assessor hide in a cupboard?

  20. on 05 Jul 2010 at 3:22 pm t'otherone

    @ Sheepless

    After reading the first couple of sentences, I actually thought EBAYTURD was suggesting a crack commando team of under-tens to sneak into classes unnoticed and assess Miss Hodgson of Middleton Primary on her ability to mark finger painting and console them after boo-boos.

  21. on 05 Jul 2010 at 4:12 pm Have Your Lurk

    Even if such a team of crack commando under-tens is set up, the teacher might still kind of twig to it. “Hmm. I wonder who that new boy is, down at the back. The very attentive one, with the voice recorder and the book of education by-laws open in front of him.”

  22. on 05 Jul 2010 at 4:16 pm Dean Cramvoid

    I was considering both those possibilities. Then I realised he’d put the comma in the wrong place. What a dalek’s dickhole.

  23. on 05 Jul 2010 at 4:19 pm Col John Matrix

    I’m numb now to the usual bad spelling and grammar characterises most of what passes as comments online, so now my new pet hate is people who semi-randomly CAPITALISE certain words in their COMMENT in order to draw attention to what they think are the most IMPORTANT parts of their argument. They seem to think it’s clever but I find it ANNOYING.

  24. on 05 Jul 2010 at 4:19 pm Undemocratic Speed Bump

    I’m most impressed that EBAYTKMAX hasn’t managed to kill herself yet, considering the level of intelligence she shows in her posts.

    It’s been mentioned, but Tabloid Watch is great for Daily Mail fails. Check out the one about Steve Jobs using Twitter.

    And this is my favourite Daily mail cancer story: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1265277/Cancer-danger-night-time-trip-toilet.html

    For fuck sake make sure you piss in the dark.

  25. on 05 Jul 2010 at 4:21 pm t'otherone

    If nothing else, the kiddie-commandos will allow the Mail will report on the ‘plague of children’ who only attend school 7 days a year.

  26. on 05 Jul 2010 at 4:55 pm ad ho

    @Col John Matrix

    Sorry but I completely AGREE with Mercer’s comments… You cannot say its “puppy fat” thats an old wives tale!

    If you capitalise your initial assertion then only use an exclamation mark when asserting the contrary, then surely that balances out to a finely nuanced argument?

  27. on 05 Jul 2010 at 5:17 pm Bob

    Got to admire Emile Heskey …. had a disastrous World Cup …. comes home , puts a Strawberry frock on and wins the Women’s title at Wimbldeon!

  28. on 05 Jul 2010 at 5:19 pm Turd Mannerism III

    my new pet hate is people who semi-randomly CAPITALISE certain words

    Pat Rattigan – HYS’er on Undemocratic Speed Bump’s cancer scare story – surely demonstrates something far worse?

    Unfortunately for the myth-makers, the national disease crisis has been spiralling since day-one of the “NHS” and is now the worst since records began.

    Is he implying the NHS does not exist?

  29. on 05 Jul 2010 at 5:27 pm Have Your Lurk

    Sorry, but saying “Sorry, but” in your posts doesn’t, eh… brain in knots already.

  30. on 05 Jul 2010 at 5:41 pm ad ho

    @Undemocratic Speed Bump
    I find a nice pot of radium tea before bedtime allows me to see where I’m pissing without risking the use of the bathroom light switch.

  31. on 05 Jul 2010 at 5:46 pm Kris

    @Undemocratic Speed Bump, you apparently didn’t see the Mail claim, with no hint of irony, that Facebook causes cancer.

  32. on 05 Jul 2010 at 6:10 pm sleeping teacher assessor

    Ask EBAYTKMAX what comes after seven and he would reply 90% or just sink into a catatonic stupor. He grudgingly accepts that the numbers 1-6 are necessary to add glory to his favourite number, but shortcircuits when invited to consider one greater.

    Ask Samantha James the same question and she’ll fire back: ALOT.

  33. on 05 Jul 2010 at 6:29 pm Have Your Lurk

    I’m sure this has been said before, but [Nelson: it has. Shut up.]

  34. on 05 Jul 2010 at 6:47 pm Nimrod

    And this is my favourite Daily mail cancer story: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1265277/Cancer-danger-night-time-trip-toilet.html

    You might also like Kill or Cure, which lists things the Mail has said will cause cancer, will prevent cancer, and will cause and prevent cancer.

  35. on 05 Jul 2010 at 7:54 pm Sheepless

    The repetition of seven in that ebaytxmax post gives it an almost biblical feel (book of Revelation, perhaps). Try reading it in Kevin Spacey’s voice for the best effect.

  36. on 05 Jul 2010 at 8:17 pm Jenny Talier

    I’m not a medical research scientist but I have been conducting my own research on the causes of cancer. I have followed 6 cancer patients home from hospital, 4 were of mixed race, 3 lived in council accomodation and a further 5 were unemployed. I’m not racist but my research shows that non-indigenous people are more likely to catch cancer than decent white people and they are draining the resources of the NHS.

  37. on 05 Jul 2010 at 9:07 pm Oddtwang

    @Col John Matrix: I always ASSUMED they picked up the HABIT from reading the Sun, which does the same thing all the BLOODY time.
    That, or they’re afraid their CapsLock key will stop working if it doesn’t get enough exercise.

  38. on 05 Jul 2010 at 11:30 pm EviltheCat

    @Bob

    Got to admire Emile Heskey …. had a disastrous World Cup …. comes home , puts a Strawberry frock on and wins the Women’s title at Wimbldeon!

    You are quite clearly a cunt.

    Not only is this a little bit racist and misogynistic, but I consider Serena Williams to be faintly attractive, and Heskey to be a fucking ass, so this really doesn’t sit well with me (possibly my problem, but I’ll get over it).

    (p.s. if this was just a fatuous attempt to plug a webiste, PockeInfo.net is shite, and you would then be more of a cunt)

  39. on 05 Jul 2010 at 11:51 pm Undemocratic Speed Bump

    @Kris

    I have seen that claim from the Mail, and read many, many others, but when I catalogued and ranked them all with my homemade marking system, the Facebook one wasn’t my favourite. The pissing in the dark one was.

    I prefer the Facebook spreads syphillis from The Sun, it’s more amusingly specific

  40. on 06 Jul 2010 at 7:25 am Have Your Lurk

    This one is quite, er, gobsmacking for several reasons.

    Headline: Men look away: Oral sex REALLY does cause some throat cancers

    Yes, it REALLY does. All your oral sex cancer fears are justified.

    Story: It is a fact most men will not want to know, but research has proven that a virus which is contracted through oral sex can cause throat cancer.
    [...blah blah blah blah...]
    Co-researcher Dr Maura Gillison said that oropharyngeal cancer is still relatively uncommon and that most people who contracted HPV probably wouldn’t develop throat cancer.

    Leaving aside the last line, which essentially says there’s no risk at all, why will most men not want to know this, exactly? They’re not the ones giving the oral sex, they’re getting it. (Assuming the study was conducted on heterosexuals.)

    Surely this article should be screaming: “WOMEN EVERYWHERE! Stop getting down on your knees and sucking off your man’s old fellow! Not alone is it an act of SUBJUGATION and SYMBOLIC RAPE, but you’ll get THROAT CANCER and your throat will blow up or something! Yes, REALLY!”

  41. on 06 Jul 2010 at 7:27 am Have Your Lurk

    Not to mention how the study was conducted. How do you measure something like this, exactly? Get a volunteer to keep sucking off other “volunteers” until she gets throat cancer? We could be here for some time.

  42. on 06 Jul 2010 at 8:33 am t'otherone

    @ HYL

    why will most men not want to know this, exactly? They’re not the ones giving the oral sex

    This explains a lot about you Lurk…

    I assure you, all my (hetrosexual) men give oral sex…

  43. on 06 Jul 2010 at 9:06 am Have Your Lurk

    Ah.

    Ahem.

    (cough, cough)

    Right. Yes, I knew that, of course I did. Ahem. Oh! Some work has just arrived, I’d better go and do it. What a shame…

  44. on 06 Jul 2010 at 9:34 am Mr Ed

    I know it’s rather a low blow to go for comment from The Sun, but this is a rather good example in regards to Ronaldo’s baby who has TWO mums! EXCLUSIVE!

    Hinderancex
    Uh,well,,,I don’t like this kind of stories(social,paparazzi)but let me add that i don’t thrust women either.Special when money is involved(thanks for taking half of our(men’s) money in a divorce,government).

    followed 20 minutes later by

    I just don’t trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn’t die.Period. :D Woman.Half of our money ~ thanks gov!,,if you stay with one,you are being silly.It gonna bite your hand eventually

    twat. Period :(

  45. on 06 Jul 2010 at 9:40 am t'otheone

    I’m willing to bet Hinderancex didn’t give his ex oral sex either.

  46. on 06 Jul 2010 at 9:59 am Mr Ed

    It’s not just his hand that got bitten.

  47. on 06 Jul 2010 at 10:31 am Dr Bugrat, M.D.

    Actually (puts on horn-rimmed spectacles), oral sex can result in a nasty yeast infection in the throat, something more commonly found in young babies. Your (real) doctor will then ask, when presented with this, if you have oral sex, and you’ll have to confess.

    I speak from experience.

  48. on 06 Jul 2010 at 11:15 am sleeping teacher assessor

    A great day to skip breakfast.

    Hinderancex is a proper flesh-crevice. Let’s imagine at the next Fathers for Justice stunt, he’s issued a really crap costume – of the Dazzler, say. And let’s imagine this stunt involves scaling, oh I dunno, Nelson’s column by means of a long ladder. The guy dressed as Captain Britain only has the old-style costume with the quarterstaff which he negligently rests against the ladder while

  49. on 06 Jul 2010 at 11:37 am Sheepless

    i don’t thrust women either

    Only because they can run faster than you.

  50. on 06 Jul 2010 at 11:44 am Have Your Lurk

    Just popped back in because I forgot my coat earlier. That’s the one, ta.

  51. on 06 Jul 2010 at 11:49 am pigfrottage

    let me add that i don’t thrust women either

    I tried once, but they objected.

    Thanks, it’s the one with the Picture of Boba Fett on the back.

  52. on 06 Jul 2010 at 2:52 pm TrumpsCombOver

    I’m not being offensive, but anyone that so much as even glances at a copy of the daily fail / heil is clearly a dog rapist.

  53. on 06 Jul 2010 at 11:13 pm Hootie McBoob

    TrumpsCombOver

    I resent the fact that you think I am a dog rapist just because I check the Mail on a daily basis! I need to know what colour bikini Christine Bleakley is wearing today!

    And I’ll have you know I only finger my dog’s arsehole cos she loves it! I get no fucking pleasure from it at all!1111