Moderation Martyrs and Permanently Bewildered and Retired Colonels and Self-appointed Sages06 Oct 2010 07:30 am
By Gainsbourg

Women. They’re everywhere, and they have been for a very long time. Many English people are women. And a lot of them are even white. How much bile, then, could Have Your Say possibly dredge up on them?

God, what a naive question. I hate you.

Because, as we all know, there is a common thread of animosity that unites everyone misguided or ill enough to actually use – rather than laugh at or weep over – HYS, regardless of their own peculiarities. And the object of that single unifying hatred is anyone or anything which doesn’t share the subject’s own peculiarities. A virtual nation united in its divisions. It’s beautiful, really, when you think about it. Almost as beautiful as the little sick I just done on my keyboard while I was thinking about it. Almost, but not quite.

So this thread on women in politics is nothing less than a masterstroke. It truly has something to offer everyone. After all, any man can hate women, whatever his nationality, colour or creed. And for the ladies? Just pick one from the opposite end of the political spectrum and bathe in her blood.

No women Plumbers, mechanics, technicians, engineers. Where is the quota? Women don’t want to do these jobs or do they? How can women expect to lead with confidence when they are missing from a huge part of Industry
Adrian O sullivan Belgium

Big in student politics, eh? Got a bit of pull within the union, have you? Tireless activist, are we? Well, you’re not impressing Adrian. Your energy, ambition, revolutionary social policies and macroeconomic strategy won’t wash with him, not until you’ve fixed that boiler.

It depends on whether we want quality or quantity, and whether we are willing to accept a possibly larger percentage of delinquent children if mothers in general are too involved in social or political activities outside the home.
Max

This is a classic response to the feminist threat: when a member of the weaker sex displays those first ominous signs of independent thought, simply appeal to the womb-brained bint’s irrepressible nature. But who’ll look after the children? Think of the little babies!

It’s a tactic with a proud tradition. It failed in 1918, it failed in 1970 and it’s failing now.

This will most likely get moderated and yet it should be considered because it is relevant.

Consider: Female President of the USA + THREAT + PMT = Armageddon
Peter Buck

In between albums, the esteemed REM guitarist is currently exploring a parallel career as Rory McGrath.

There are simply too few Women up to the job or are simply too Female biassed to be fair. Harriet Harman – the extremely anti – anything Male MP – is ONE case in point.

I challenge the Media to hold a Survey of the Political knowledge of any ordinary Woman living in any ordinary street and publish the Results.

The only acceptable exception was Margaret Thatcher – she worked for the whole Country – NOT just Women…
Tez

Tez. Blokey blokey diamond geezer Tez. What is he? Is he a confused egalitarian? Is he a razor-sharp social satirist with a finely-honed instinct for corrosive irony? Or is he simply a pigshit-thick Sun reader waddling down a provincial high street at 1am on a Sunday morning, chilli sauce down his top, pants round his ankles, pathetically tugging at his lager-shrivelled cock?

Women in power scare me. Have you ever asked a women in power something and it seems she says no just because she can? Also, i think that the public looks to men more for their leadership. When you think of some official, what comes to mind, a woman or a man?
Locke

Say what you like about Locke – and I have: I’ve been saying he’s an embarrassment to anyone who ever owned a penis; I’ve been saying those women would have likely cauterised themselves shut before ever acceding to his grubby requests; I’ve been saying he’s a weak, whining, slimy column of trembling flesh barely fit for doner meat – say whatever you like about him, but at least he’s honest.

82 Responses to “And They Waste Time Debating Make-Up And Boys”

  1. on 06 Oct 2010 at 8:03 am Robin

    I like to think of how these people might have responded to political questions in the past. “Free the slaves? Come on! When you think of someone who’s not a slave, what comes to mind, a white person or a slave?”

  2. on 06 Oct 2010 at 9:47 am Schroduck

    Consider: Female President of USA + Peter Buck + pepper spray = Best possible outcome.

  3. on 06 Oct 2010 at 9:47 am Morat

    {blockquote}The only acceptable exception was Margaret Thatcher – she worked for the whole Country – NOT just Women…{/blockquote}

    great for the country, wouldn’t wanna shag it?

  4. on 06 Oct 2010 at 9:48 am Morat

    dicks, this isnt the guardian website is it?

  5. on 06 Oct 2010 at 9:52 am Albert Angelo

    dicks, this isnt the guardian website is it?

    No – this is the place where blockquotes come to die.

  6. on 06 Oct 2010 at 10:00 am damon green

    Morat: no, this is a pound shop, and that’s your coat over there. £2 please

  7. on 06 Oct 2010 at 10:22 am Otter Bollocks

    I reckon Locke gets told “no” a lot by women.

    “Can I, please?”
    “no”

    “Go on, please?”
    “no”

    “I’ll be quick.”
    “no.”

    etc. etc. ad nauseum

  8. on 06 Oct 2010 at 10:43 am Turd^3

    Peter Buck’s vomit-inducing, mindless fuckwittery reminds me of a famous question in the SQA Higher mathematic examinations. Can someone help me with my math?

    If, as Peter Buck asserts,

    Female President of the USA + THREAT + PMT = Armageddon

    and as we already know,

    Female President of the United States)^Six Massive Horse Cocks – One Gastrointestinal tract = A Welshman

    … what time should we expect to bomb Swansea?

  9. on 06 Oct 2010 at 10:55 am Kris

    Have you ever asked a woman in power something and it seems she says no just because she can?

    ‘Please touch my filthy, syphillictic cock’?

    Frigid bitch.

  10. on 06 Oct 2010 at 11:04 am Dave

    I challenge the Media to hold a Survey of the Political knowledge of any ordinary Woman living in any ordinary street and publish the Results.

    I’d be quite interested in seeing how Tez would fare in such a survey, preferably with the result being broadcast widely in the media under the headline “Unreconstructed Thatcherite bell-end displays paltry understanding of political process.”

  11. on 06 Oct 2010 at 11:26 am Stop the wars and so on

    Clearly even their mothers couldn’t love them.

  12. on 06 Oct 2010 at 11:37 am Mim

    As Tez does not, from the manner of his Capitals, appear to dwell in this or indeed any recent Century, his appraisal of the Political Knowledge of Women is perhaps based on an Assumption that they are denied the most Rudimentary of Educations.

  13. on 06 Oct 2010 at 11:47 am Philbert

    If

    Female President of the USA + THREAT + PMT = Armageddon

    then clearly Female President of the USA = Armageddon-THREAT-PMT. And who wouldn’t want a non-threatening, PMT-free Armageddon?

  14. on 06 Oct 2010 at 12:38 pm Theodore

    Peter Buck does have a point. Can you imagine what Stalin, Pol Pot, Hitler and General Franco might have done if they were women and were about to have the painters in?

  15. on 06 Oct 2010 at 12:48 pm Dean Cramvoid

    Max_Mahajan wrote:

    I am NOT a MCP but NEITHER am I going to bend over backwards and submit when I see a fallacious proposition with an Amazonian agenda behind it!

    Go on, I can tell you want to. I can see it in your eyes, you dirty little manwhore!

  16. on 06 Oct 2010 at 12:49 pm Rotwatcher

    “Can I, please?”
    “no”

    “Go on, please?”
    “no”

    “I’ll be quick.”
    “no.”

    Or, in Locke’s case,

    “I won’t take long, did I”.

  17. on 06 Oct 2010 at 1:03 pm Mim

    “Fallacious” eh, Max? Fner fner.

  18. on 06 Oct 2010 at 1:25 pm That Bloke in the Corner

    an Amazonian agenda behind it!

    Is there nothing that Amazon won’t peddle?
    Agendas now. Would that be free delivery within the UK?

  19. on 06 Oct 2010 at 1:29 pm Goldstein

    Have you ever asked a woman in power something and it seems she says no just because she can?

    Absolutely. Which is why women should only occupy positions from which they can’t say no.

  20. on 06 Oct 2010 at 1:36 pm Cora

    More of the same at ‘do sons have it easier than daughters’…

    25. At 08:43am on 06 Oct 2010, bob bobwell wrote:
    19. At 08:29am on 06 Oct 2010, smilingparrotfan wrote:
    “What a dumb daft question to ask. Is there a shortage of subject matter?”

    Clearly for the netmums users there is. I guess they can’t discuss prams and breast pumps all day.

    At 09:19am on 06 Oct 2010, entreri100404 wrote:
    “Netmums”?
    Gaahh! Is this seriously the best the BBC can do as a source of a discussion topic now? An all-female, by choice, organisation of mums admits to treating daughters more strictly than sons, so you ask the question “Do sons have it easier than daughters?” without ever even considering how FATHERS treat their sons and daughters.

    Newsflash: Children are raised by FATHERS too, so unless you take the father’s influence into account and deal with how fathers as well as mothers treat sons and daughters respectively, you aren’t going to get an answer to your question, are you?

    Shame…It must be awful, being so angry all the time.

  21. on 06 Oct 2010 at 2:09 pm Out of the Woodwork

    so unless you take the father’s influence into account and deal with how fathers as well as mothers treat sons and daughters respectively, you aren’t going to get an answer to your question, are you?

    I know its a huge mistake to underestimate HYSers but what part of HYS does he not get, does he think that as he is not a monther the bbc are refusing him his say on how he would abuse his daughter and only allowing him to moan about said fact?

  22. on 06 Oct 2010 at 2:12 pm Out of the Woodwork

    Damn mother not monther, I don’t even know how that n got in there! Seriously looking at my keyboard and typing it out again it’s no where near where “T” is. Damn my idiot fingers!

  23. on 06 Oct 2010 at 2:18 pm helen_s

    Male president of the US + imaginary threat + weird religious delusions = nothing to worry about at all.

  24. on 06 Oct 2010 at 2:27 pm Ed aka Voltaire

    @helen_s: Best. Response. EVAR.

  25. on 06 Oct 2010 at 2:41 pm Kris

    Guys, guys! I just hit the jackpot, a genuine IYLISMWDYGLT directed at me. I don’t really remember what prompted this, as I just found it in my youtube inbox from a couple years ago.

    you know what you are? a little 25 year old little punk..
    gone to liberal schools all your life and never ever have an open mind or look to see what the other side is about..
    you think you have all the answers..
    lets see, you are 25 living in you parents basement, you watch MSNBC in your boxer shorts and you are wating for your time right? your time, the time that obama will walk across water and take care of you like the good little drone that you have been to him organizing and getting the vote going, right?.all the while watching keith obermann’s count down to no ratings waiting for him to say ” lets play odd ball ” because thats your favorite part of the spin show.. right? do I have that about right?
    assholes like you have no place in this country.. if you hate it so much you are free to move to venezuala I hear thats about as liberal a country as you can get… you fuck wad…

    Wow. Is this guy fucking psychic? It’s like he painted a picture of my life.

  26. on 06 Oct 2010 at 3:07 pm helen_s

    You fuck wad? really? How do you do that? (And, more importantly, is it fun?)

  27. on 06 Oct 2010 at 3:20 pm Kris


    wad
    n.
    1. A small mass of soft material, often folded or rolled, used for padding, stuffing, or packing.

    Given that there’s at least 3 innuendos in there, yes it’s possible to fuck wad. Unfortunately instructions are not included.

  28. on 06 Oct 2010 at 3:37 pm conultant

    interesting post

  29. on 06 Oct 2010 at 3:38 pm Undemocratic Speed Bump

    @Kris

    What was that in response? Did you suggest that you had a political opinion that wasn’t identical to Glenn Beck’s?

  30. on 06 Oct 2010 at 3:44 pm Undemocratic Speed Bump

    I left the word ‘to’ out of my first question there. And has anyone braver than me found out what govt_helper is up to now that Your Freedom turned out to be a halarious waste of time

  31. on 06 Oct 2010 at 3:54 pm Kris

    What was that in response [to]?

    I’m fair sure it was ‘On reflection, the Iraq war was probably not cool.’

  32. on 06 Oct 2010 at 4:14 pm Any Rand will do

    assholes like you have no place in this country.. if you hate it so much you are free to move to venezuala I hear thats about as liberal a country as you can get… you fuck wad…

    Aww, I think somebody needed a hug.

  33. on 06 Oct 2010 at 4:28 pm Felix

    “Consider: Female President of the USA + THREAT + PMT = Armageddon”

    Parent Management Training? Pacemaker-mediated tachycardia? Partido Mexicano de los Trabajadores?

  34. on 06 Oct 2010 at 4:28 pm bolli

    Adrian thinks that Blair, Brown, Bush (Snr&Jnr), Clinton and Obama all had careers in plumbing before taking up government?

    And Locke is absolutely right. I say “No” to men just because i can. I HAVE THE POWER! *derranged cackle* Of course were the man not a total gobshite, i might say yes. Because i can. Feminism got mad, i know. I’ll be given the vote next if you don’t shut this down soon…

  35. on 06 Oct 2010 at 4:57 pm tw@basket.com

    I am NOT a MCP but NEITHER am I going to bend over backwards and submit when I see a fallacious proposition with an Amazonian agenda behind it!

    What the fuck has Microsoft certification got to do with any of this shit? I mean, I hate Bill Gates as much as anybody else but I really don’t think any of this particular crap is his fault.

  36. on 06 Oct 2010 at 5:24 pm Jones

    it seems she says no just because she can

    Locke not quite getting his head around “no means no”?

  37. on 06 Oct 2010 at 6:12 pm [insert pseudonym here]

    has anyone braver than me found out what govt_helper is up to now that Your Freedom turned out to be a halarious waste of time

    [insert high intelligence based callsign here] dealt with him. No one will ever suspect that his catching of MRSA in one of the worst maintained hospitals in the UK wasn’t accidental.

  38. on 06 Oct 2010 at 6:52 pm Ugeine

    I have a feeling this is just another example of feminists demanding equality only at the top. Recall in other news, those chilean miners trapped for weeks? Notice they are all men? Why aren’t feminists demanding equality for undesirable and dangerous jobs like that?

    It’s odd, because I’ll bet a tenner that Steve wants to sleep with Penelope Cruz, Beyonce and, Scarlett Johansson but doesn’t want to spend even one day as an abused Eastern European sex worker.

  39. on 06 Oct 2010 at 7:21 pm Turd-in-the-face

    Check the BBC: HYS on PM’s speech if you get the opportunity.

    Gotta love the constant Winston Churchill paraphrasing.

    Never in the history of any nation, have so many been forced to sacrifice so much to save the lifestyles of so few!!!

    Biased_Beeb is interesting though…

    Gloriously sycophantic BBC coverage. Multiple rolling images from the channel that sold out to the Tories years ago. He has not been asked a single serious hard question by the likes of Neill, Maitless, Roibinson etc throughout this conference. He lied repeatedly in his election campaign or he is doing so now – he has wheeled on his wife and children as props yet the BBC bites its collective tongue while he spouts twaddle. ‘It was all Labour’s fault’ ‘We didn’t know how bad things were…’ If they didn’t know what the circumstances were they shouldn’t have made the promises and weren’t fit to be in charge. The presentation of this speech by the BBC in itself shows a spineless cowardice. Any journalist worth his pay would have reduced this shambolic coalition to ashes by now – but when you get senior BBC people having the brass neck to say ‘Fairness is in our genes…’ you get the feeling that such fantasists should be put on the minimum wage for a year or two and be at the receiving end of Osborne’s relentless attack on the disadvantaged Then maybe they can connect with the real world! You can turn down the sound on this one and just repeat ‘he is lying’ to yourself – then look at the scripted standing ovation and you will feel better than listening to this feckless toff doing his Basil Fawlty impression!

    NuLiebor, communist, pro-European, brass necked BBC that sold out to Conservative fat cats years ago?

  40. on 06 Oct 2010 at 8:04 pm Cylux

    And has anyone braver than me found out what govt_helper is up to now that Your Freedom turned out to be a halarious waste of time

    I’ve not actually bothered looking but he went into a bit of a strop about his “Axe minister for women or make a minster for men” thread being pulled for, er, “unknown” reasons. During this strop he muttered darkly about men, if not able to discuss their “persecution” on Your Freedom, would just discuss it in the dark corners of the internet where men are free to talk away from their “oppressors”.

    So I imagine a quick vigil for the long-winded furtive twat on mens-rights websites would rustle up the micro-penised chozzler.

  41. on 06 Oct 2010 at 8:53 pm new scientist

    An all-female, by choice, organisation of mums

    Sorry, but how could an organisation of mums choose to NOT be all-female? Or is this an organisation of transgender mums? I’m confuddled.

  42. on 06 Oct 2010 at 11:06 pm Kris

    Liberals like you might try to claim that ‘God made you that way’, new scientist, but the FACT is that being female is a lifestyle choice. A choice that only perverts would take.

    Wearing a skirt? Having boobs? SICK.

  43. on 07 Oct 2010 at 3:00 am MonBiff

    No women Plumbers, mechanics, technicians, engineers. Where is the quota? Women don’t want to do these jobs or do they? How can women expect to lead with confidence when they are missing from a huge part of Industry
    Adrian O sullivan Belgium

    Yes – us men are like the Borg (Not Bjorn – the other one – the one that’s an alien species). I can easily rebuild the engine of a vauxhall astra. Not because I’ve ever learnt to, but because some bloke I’ve never met can do it.

  44. on 07 Oct 2010 at 3:10 am Bogan tax exile

    Someone had better tell Adrian O sullivan that wimen CAN be miners now, LEGALLY:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/06/woman-free-miner

  45. on 07 Oct 2010 at 11:51 am Kris

    Speaking of wimmin-folk, there’s a Hooters in the UK now.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1318258/Hooters–offensive-bar-Britain-Asks-Liz-Jones.html

    It’ll never work in the UK our women are just too boot ugly and stuck up themselves to make it the right kind of atmosphere.
    How many 6 foot, slim, front loaded, gorgeous women with a lads sense of humour do you know.
    Its a shame really because in the states there’s no where better to go to get away from the wife, watch the sport, have a few beers and some good old deep fried food with something easy on the eye that isn’t gonna moan at you every 10 mins.
    Anyway thats not a hooters, those women wouldn’t get a job cleaning the dishes in a hooters in the states.
    - Paul, Aberdeen, 7/10/2010 1:46

    I’m not a patriotic man. I don’t give a shit if you hate the UK and everyone in it.

    But am I the only one who cannot stand it when people say British women are ugly?

    I don’t want to come across as an unreconstructed sexist, but I’m going to. Fuck that, Paul you prick, there are just as many properly fit birds/tarts/bitches in this country as any other.

    Actually maybe he’s just got bad taste after reading Zoo and Nuts every day for the last 20 years, because a

    6 foot, slim, front loaded, gorgeous [woman] with a lads sense of humour

    sounds like a fucking nightmare to me.

  46. on 07 Oct 2010 at 12:13 pm ad ho

    I am NOT a MCP but NEITHER am I going to bend over backwards and submit when I see a fallacious proposition with an Amazonian agenda behind it!

    There are no conceivable alternatives to those two positions other than perhaps to bend over forwards and submit to the iron fist of an alpha male, true and strong. It’s not gay if it’s true enough and strong enough and if your guts get lined with rust.

  47. on 07 Oct 2010 at 1:06 pm Fuzzball

    I am not a MCP …
    Ah, the good old MCP. Who can forget the end of Tron, where the poor thing was dying, spinning wildly, talking nonsense, and disappearing up it’s own arse.
    I think, on the balance of probability, that Max_Mahajan is the MCP. Or a cunt.

  48. on 07 Oct 2010 at 1:07 pm Fuzzball

    Gruntfuck bloody blockquotes …

  49. on 07 Oct 2010 at 2:39 pm brager cunt

    Paul, Aberdeen, 7/10/2010 1:46

    As if the obnoxious quote wasn’t enough, we then find out he’s posting at 1.46 on a Thursday morning.

    I think the reference to ‘the wife’ may be a wishful one.

  50. on 07 Oct 2010 at 5:43 pm turd-at-eleven

    No shortage of them in the US……but many fall short, with voters.

    HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA… Do you get it? HAHAHAHAHA… You see, it is not because Republicans and Democrats stick a bunch of women in unwinnable seats to improve their image with voters. No, it is because women are shit and no-one wants to vote for them.

    What tsigli has done is actually pretty clever. He explains that there are no shortage of female candidates, and that actually there is a shortage of votes for WOMEN. Again, because they are shit, as I explained already.

  51. on 07 Oct 2010 at 8:38 pm Misogynist Pig who ate a Metrosexual

    Ugh, women. FEMALES. They are smelly and have long hair and squishy breasts and beautiful eyes and smell so so nice….

    Oh…

  52. on 07 Oct 2010 at 10:30 pm Kris

    From the Guardian’s facebook feed.

    Roz Rayner-Rix

    Forget the emissions. If we cut back on CO2, the plant life will suffer, plants need CO2 to survive, in return they produce oxygen for us to survive.
    The more CO2 we have the better the plantlife, more food for everyone.
    This is all a horri…fic eugenics scam to eventually tell us there is not enough food to go round and we will all have to eat GM foods, while paying carbon taxes. Sounds like control to me.
    There never has been a problem with global warming.
    CO2 is necessary for the function of all life on this planet.
    If anyone still believes this then they seriously have been hoodwinked to put it politely.

    Science or facts getting you down? Try new;

    OVERSIMPLIFICATION!

    With one simple application of uninformed school grade thinking, you can simply brush away those irritating years of peer reviewed science! Dazzle your friends as you make incredible, nonsensical logical leaps! Astound your colleagues as you confidently claim that since it’s snowing, global warming is a myth!

    Buy now, for the low, low price of your public dignity!

    OVERSIMPLIFICATION®, in assocation with all tabloid newspapers ever.

  53. on 08 Oct 2010 at 12:01 am DonkeySquicker

    Nasty complicated things make our heads hurt, and hurty heads are bad.

  54. on 08 Oct 2010 at 9:29 am Lentil Molester

    I’ve just read that Daily Heil article and agreed with it 100%.

    And then read the comments and felt the need to go buy some napalm.

    Still, at least we have the names and addresses of most of the sex offenders in the country.

  55. on 08 Oct 2010 at 10:15 am LaughingAtTheBassists

    The Mail, first with the news as always. The chain that has “just arrived” in Britain has been here for the best part of 10 years… is that how long it takes to build up a good helping of tabloid outrage these days?

  56. on 08 Oct 2010 at 10:53 am James

    That was a terrific Liz Jones piece – you can almost feel her shrivelling up as she lurches from one angry rage to another: culminating in some ill-suppressed rage about Poles.

    Now I almost think I like Hooters because it annoys Liz Jones.

    But then I remember it’s Hooters.

  57. on 08 Oct 2010 at 1:50 pm passerby otter bollock

    @LaughingAtTheBassists

    I personally love the way she writes that Hooters “has just arrived”, and a bit down the page writes of an employee who’s been there for two years. Mail. Comedy gold.

    And Hooters is shit.

  58. on 08 Oct 2010 at 1:59 pm Cora

    Archbishop Desmobd Tutu retires, and over at HYS they are getting all annoyed and fussy:

    martyjg:

    Why do you allow comments on nonsensical topics yet the important ones are passed by? There is no point in accessing this site if major issues are ‘taboo’!
    Desmond Tutu? who cares?

    Garth Crooks Is Admiral Ackbar sufc:

    Why is the BBC so obsessed with Africa?

    Wyn:

    Desmond who? And who gives a damn anyway?

    Kuradi vitukari:

    What is Archbishop Desmond Tutu’s legacy? Next to nothing. All mouth and little action.

    I liked these ones the best:

    Chris mather:

    I never met the man, so ANY judgement is unfair, but I have to say I never liked or trusted him. He came across to me as sleezy and self-serving. But, as I say, that’s not a fair judgement since I didn’t know him personally.

    AND

    Milvusvestal:

    I’m quite sure he’s a very nice chap with a wonderful sense of humour. Beyond that, he strikes me as little different from so many people I’ve met over the years – which leaves me wondering why HYS contributors’ responses are felt to be so vital.

    Do the moderators have some hidden agenda we know nothing about?

  59. on 08 Oct 2010 at 3:06 pm Kris

    @Cora

    That last one is GOLD, I love it.

    Milvusvestal has taken the whole ‘thinking my HYS comments are vital to the running of our democracy’ thing to the next level. He knows his comments are of vast importance, but he can’t quite work out why.

    My theory? The moderators are manipulating the greatest thinkers of our age to put down all their ideas and opinions in one place so that the combined intellect of every HYS contributor can be harvested, to power a single lightbulb in BBC headquarters.

  60. on 08 Oct 2010 at 3:33 pm Kris

    I’ve clearly been posting too much, but I have to share this

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/lloyd-marcus-tea-party-blog/2010/oct/08/lloyd-marcus-tea-party

    I haven’t even read the article (who fucking cares what anyone from the Tea Party has ever thought) but read the first 8 comments or so, and realise what CiF has become.

  61. on 08 Oct 2010 at 6:51 pm Johnny Rotten

    A great little titbit from the Daily Mail newspaper

    If the US can stop people using welfare money to buy sugary drinks, why can’t the UK stop our own benefit scroungers spending welfare money on cigarettes, drink, foreign holidays, video games, flat screen TVs and boob jobs?
    - Peter, Macclesfield, 8/10/2010 16:53
    Click to rate Rating 90

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1318830/New-York-proposes-ban-low-income-Americans-using-food-stamps-buy-sugary-drinks.html#ixzz11n5HuNuH

    By the time I would have paid my rent, council tax, PAYE, NI, pension, CSA bill, petrol to work, prescriptions, kids school meals, I would need the same wage and expenses as David Cameron to afford to work. You fuckers wont vote for me so I am staying on the dole.

  62. on 08 Oct 2010 at 7:12 pm Ed aka Voltaire

    sYB gods: is “Johnny Homeowner” coming from the same IP range as the other ‘tards, or is it a genuinely new induhvidual?

  63. on 08 Oct 2010 at 10:17 pm Cylux

    If the US can stop people using welfare money to buy sugary drinks, why can’t the UK stop our own benefit scroungers spending welfare money on cigarettes, drink, foreign holidays, video games, flat screen TVs and boob jobs?

    On the subject of being a gormless cunt, one of my supervisors at work today declared that “People on benefits should have to have an injection or something that prevents them from breeding until they get a job and can afford to raise their own kids. I’m sick of my taxes being used to pay for the upbringing of children from jobless parents!”

    For some reason he took great exception to me calling him a “festering wet pile of manky soiled shrivelled shlongs dipped in diarrhoea”. He hasn’t figured out yet why I now call him either “Hugh” or “Jennicks”.

    Also “on benefits” changed to “on Job seekers allowance” once I mentioned child benefit…

  64. on 08 Oct 2010 at 10:51 pm Turd-Plough

    Just gotta love that token black guy in cowboy hat opens his shit flaps. What’s more, you can actually see the thought process of a cunt.

    1. Realisation.

    I just realised I envy you, Lloyd Marcus.

    To think of the number of “honest”, hard working” white Americans fighting to take their country back for whom you are their “black friend”.

    You sir, are f**king powerful!!

    Stick it to the Man!

    Blumboclart, here, showing us the moment when a little Englander fucktard realises some black people are also monotonous shit filters.

    2. Deployment in “Comment is Free/Have Your Say”.

    How dare a black man who lived in a project tell white, middle class and privileged liberals what it was like? Doesn’t he know that the majority of Guardian readers know better than everyone else about every subject?

    Also where does he mention Israel’s blame for the predicament of so many black Americans?

    hereagain deploying new black friend’s shitty anecdote in Guardian’s crapfest.

  65. on 09 Oct 2010 at 12:04 am Kris

    @Turd Plough

    Yeah, that one from hereagain is similiar to about 90% of the comments. Cif is now almost entirely people going on about ‘what Guardian readers think is x’ and ‘oh, here come the white middle class liberals to tell us what to do’. Not realising that they are the fucking Guardian readers now.

    Anyone who ever, ever says ‘the Left thinks this’ or ‘this is the problem with you conservatives’ – in other words anyone who splits the whole human race into binary groups who all have the exact same opinions, thought processes and personalities – is a fucking idiot and can just eat a bag of fucking dicks. Or go back to the youtube comments sections and play their childish fucking ‘is fascism a leftist system’ games where they belong.

    While I’m at it, if use the word leftist you can fuck right off as well, you pointless twat.

  66. on 09 Oct 2010 at 1:26 am tw@basket.com

    Also where does he mention Israel’s blame for the predicament of so many black Americans?

    WTF?

  67. on 09 Oct 2010 at 10:18 am Buyright of the Gods

    Also where does he mention Israel’s blame for the predicament of so many black Americans?

    Just before the Red Sea, on the left?

  68. on 09 Oct 2010 at 1:31 pm Johnny Rotten

    Who was the Lefty woman on this weeks question time who said it was unfair for the ConDems to limit breeders who have never had a job in their lifes to the equivalent of 35K per year.
    Would it be the same type of Lefty female that thinks its perfectly OK to make a person who has worked all his life to be forced to give half his 35K wage with which he is trying to support his current wife and three kids to his ex alcoholic wife and one kid to subsidise her vodka bill?

  69. on 09 Oct 2010 at 2:24 pm Small Billy Goat Gruff

    And he went trip-trap, trip-trap over the rickety-rackety bridge without disturbing the troll.

  70. on 09 Oct 2010 at 3:39 pm john adair

    I have often thought that whilst the class system in this once great country is as strong and diverse as it ever was, the wording needs changing to include the under class who are certainly not working (unless breeding or appearing on the jeremy Kyle show are classed as work) but are the new lower class. Then I got this little snippet from the mail which sums it up perfectly

    Working Class – unemployed sponger.

    Middle Class – working like a dog to pay for everyone.

    Upper Class – politicians, quangocrats, council leaders, bankers – spending your money like water.
    - Fedd Upp, London UK, 09/10/2010 11:27
    Click to rate Rating 23

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1319052/Cameron-great-qualities-But-hell-understand-middle-classes-like-Mrs-T.html#ixzz11s97fTb1

    Excellent! what is a troll again?

  71. on 09 Oct 2010 at 4:03 pm Gainsbourg

    sYB gods: is “Johnny Homeowner” coming from the same IP range as the other ‘tards, or is it a genuinely new induhvidual?

    Same

  72. on 09 Oct 2010 at 5:53 pm Kris

    Is Fedd Upp fed up with his victim complex?

  73. on 09 Oct 2010 at 11:14 pm MonkeyBot

    tw@basket.com

    Also where does he mention Israel’s blame for the predicament of so many black Americans

    WTF?

    Haven’t you heard? All the posters on CiF blames poor little Israel for everything.

    There must be something wrong with my browser though as all I can see is the posters complaining about the posters who blame Israel for everything.

  74. on 10 Oct 2010 at 12:11 am Turd-in-the-field

    @Cura

    The Desmond Tutu could of been replicated easily in the ‘Chinese dissident wins Nobel peace prize’ thread. Some followed that trend.

    Another pointless award.

    Tony of Britain is the best though, despite starting his post with..

    Never heard of him…

    He proceeds to write at length about something. Not sure what it was, I am sure it is quite elucidating none-the-less.

    The oppressed/silent/hard-working/Christian majority who strive for democracy are the best though.

    Maybe after his release from prison Mr Liu could come to the UK and demonstrate and demand democracy, which in UK is very pretentious and biased solely to empower the major political partys.

    True democracy is Proportional representation, one person ONE vote that ACTUALLY counts.

    Hypocrisy.
    China is progressing on the way it can, while we are regressing.
    blockquote>

    Fuck sake, has the Nobel Prize committee not reviewed any of Tony_of_Britain’s posts?

  75. on 10 Oct 2010 at 12:48 am Pete Tong

    Excellent! what is a troll again?

    The great John Adair returns at last, welcome back mate.

  76. on 10 Oct 2010 at 11:30 am Dipsomaniac Physics Student (formerly A Cunt A Day Keeps The Forrins Away)

    @Kris: You owe me a keyboard, thank you very much.
    the definition of troll is indeterminate, but on present evidence it’s the sort of person my great-uncle bayonetted just before being capped at Dieppe.

  77. on 10 Oct 2010 at 2:37 pm Johnny Rotten

    @Kris: You owe me a keyboard, thank you very much.
    the definition of troll is indeterminate, but on present evidence it’s the sort of person my great-uncle bayonetted just before being capped at Dieppe.

    Dont you think the old keyboard joke is wearing a bit thin Philby old chap?

    The sort of person your great-uncle bayonetted at Dieppe (if you ever had any active serving members of the armed forces in your family which I very much doubt) would of been an ordinary working class German civilian conned into going to fight the evil Tommy in the same way we were all conned into going to fight the evil Hun who would cut you up and eaten you if captured we were all told.
    Wake up from your false left wing slumber and see the light, we are all being conned and by allowing it to happen are the becoming as guilty as those that manipulate us.
    Right, must get back to work, got a 70 hour a week job, on a 38 hour a week 2005 salary to do, to help bail out the bankers and politicians, we are all in this together dont you know?

  78. on 10 Oct 2010 at 10:45 pm welsh boy

    Please can I feed the troll? Please?!

  79. on 11 Oct 2010 at 12:35 am Hog Lumps

    The troll is right about something though, that bloody keyboard/monitor joke became old quite a few years ago now, it gets on moi tits.

  80. on 11 Oct 2010 at 1:22 am Pete Tong

    A troll a day keeps LiberalLeftandproud away.

  81. on 11 Oct 2010 at 1:52 pm eleanora

    I suspect that Jonny Rotten is nice, but dim.

  82. on 13 Oct 2010 at 1:09 am Billy Goat Gruff

    Back away slowly, welsh boy. I won’t be able to protect you if you go under the bridge…