spEak You're bRanes

Armchair Generals and Racists and Self-appointed Sages08 Feb 2011 09:33 am

By Gainsbourg

Most of us can just about deal with the fact that there are brown people in the world. Especially when so many of them are safely quarantined in oppressive regimes.

But what happens when they start clamouring for the right to self-govern? Can they be trusted with freedom? Are they ready for it? Or will they, in fact, use it to mount global jihad? I think we all know the answer to that question. jack certainly thinks he does.

He doesn’t, though, he’s a fucking moron. Thanks to Andrew for finding him.

Should we be concerned about Egypt, I am old enough to remember 1967, the Middle East War only ceased because the West bought off Egypt! An unstable or at worst an Iranian influenced Egypt will lead to one thing, WW111. WW11 was about the Jews and again WW111 will also be. Just look at Iraq when Sadam was dislodged – mayhem, the same will be the case in Egypt but magnified many times. Be careful what you wish for there are far worse things then the devil!
jack

At least, I hope he’s wrong. The world’s still reeling from WW110.

150 Responses to “I’d Rather Fleetwood Mac”

on 08 Feb 2011 at 9:57 am john Adair's Gerbil

And here was me thinking WW2 was about a fucking meglomaniac blaming the Jews for all the faults in the world.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 11:21 am TrumpsCombOver

“An unstable or at worst an Iranian influenced Egypt will lead to one thing, WW111″

I only know of two ‘world wars’, when did the other 108 happen?

Methinks jack is a bit of a bigoted mentalist!
on 08 Feb 2011 at 11:22 am SK? Pissed.

WW11 was about the Jews and again WW111 will also be.

World War 11? For fucks sakes, I’ve only read as far as 2 and already some fucking bigoted old trouser stain is giving spoilers away all over the show. What a crappy start to a Tuesday…
on 08 Feb 2011 at 11:25 am Arseington

I didn’t know there were that many sequels to Waynes World
on 08 Feb 2011 at 11:37 am Undemocratic Speed Bump

do not click on that link to jack’s archive of word piss. only an hour ago and this:

Children under the age of 25 shouldn’t be left alone, oh no, not in Paedophile Nation UK, when nearly every adult is a “child abuser”, in the view of the Authorities it must be very difficult to find an adult that is NOT a paedophile, this must be true now, draconian laws recently introduced seems to make any man who fancies a 16 or 17 year girl is NOW considered a paedophile, sex offender and “child” abuser, people can marry at 16, have sex at 16, have children at 16 and yet the dating agencies and web sites debar these people from using their sevices with the hideous internet induced consmetic 18+ only, surely this is discriminatory, are 16 and 17 years not allowed to seek love and a partner? The subject of this topic, when is a someone mature enough to mind a young child? this is so arbitrary someone who is 12 can be more mature than someone who is 16, just as someone who is 16 can be more mature than someone who is 20, age does not determine maturity and responsibility. Get young adults out to work at 14 and stop increasing the pension age with people “dying in harness”, nature determines the maturity of people NOT a bunch of old men sitting on green benches who are less than .0000000001% of the population making laws that are so out of kilter with the real world and have such ramifications for the population who have to live with their draconian, out of touch and repressive rules.

do not click on it.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 11:52 am LaughingAtTheBassists

Okay, there are many things wrong with that post, but the mathematician in me immediately jumps to

less than .0000000001% of the population

That’s not even close to one whole person. Also, surely the age limit on dating sites is more to do with ability to own credit cards than it is to do with anything even tangentially related to that rage-induced paedo-bollocks?
on 08 Feb 2011 at 12:02 pm AndyB

Looking at Jack’s other posts, does anybody get the impression that he is somewhat creepily obsessed with teenage girls’ breasts?
on 08 Feb 2011 at 12:30 pm Felna

I suspect we have a regular twat in the offing. Found this little gem in his archives:

You cannot abate neighbours that are disruptive. Going back to the early 1950′s when we were rehoused after the war in one of the many council houses that were built around that time. Our council home was in Ascot, yes Ascot Royal Berkshire, I could see the Racecourse clock from my bedroom window, we had neighbours that could only be described as the neighbours from Hell and Back, although two doors down they caused mahem along the whole road. I used to beat the shite out the two boys that the family had time and time again, but they still came back for more, my father an ex-boxer flattened the father but still they caused mayhem, my mother rowed with the mother and tore her to pieces verbally but still they caused trouble and were disruptive. Trouble makers are permenant however you deal with them. I learned from my experience from 4 years of age onward and now ignore, still I grew up quickly not like today’s cotton wool generation, I stood on my own two feet by time I was 9 years of age.

Sounds like his family were the real neighbours form hell – flattening and beating the shite out of anyone in their road that annoyed them.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 12:41 pm Felna

This guy really is goldmine of twattishness – his response to ‘Did god create the universe’ – apparently the jews are the descendents of a colony of humans from Mars that escaped when their world died:

I totally agree with Professor Hawkins, “g”od is a man made invention, just as all the so called “religions”; sects created to cajol, control and scare poorly educated people over the centuries and in todays world of enlightenment we are plagued with these sects causing mayhem and destruction in the world. I do though have a strong feeling that we/some of us humans are not of the earth, although like the Professor believe that the Universe and all within was self creating together with life itself, however there is still room for commuting from one world to another which is why I think humans on Earth probably came from another world, could have been Mars, which was dying and colonized the Earth, the story of the Hebrew people could have more truth than the twist of invented religion, the Jewish people’s could probably have been the first to colonize and as the generations became illiterate took the colonization as being created by a god and being here was his promise to them as a safe haven, from the world left behind. Just a theory, scared illiterate people look for answers, that is why we live a violent world today, violence driven by the madness that is religion. Very sad.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 12:44 pm Charles Exford, Oxton

I stood on my own two feet by time I was 9 years of age

You mean you were left on your own while still under the age of 25, Jack? It’s no wonder that you’ve turned into a Neanderthal fucknuckle with a grasp of history abysmal enough for the general public to think that you hail from Buttfuck, Mississippi.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 1:23 pm Otter Bollocks

9 years to learn how to stand up and still I imagine the knuckles are scraping the floor. I reckon he used the paedophile rant in court as well
on 08 Feb 2011 at 1:59 pm Manly J. Panda

Are you all still here?

I think jack is going to be great fun. You say that he contradicts himself with the space of a few sentences? And that he beats up people who annoy him? And that he was alive in 1967? And that he believes Semetic peoples are from Outer Space?

I like. I like.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 2:00 pm Manly J. Panda

Is WW111 the new WW!!!?

OMFG!!11! WW!!!11!!
on 08 Feb 2011 at 2:02 pm RIPOFF BRITIAN

The Egyptian people have re-established my faith in humanity, and then pedo mentalist Jack comes along

What a cunt.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 2:10 pm Manly J. Panda

Thank fuck there’s some perspective on what’s happening for the Egyptian people:

15. At 12:57pm on 31 Jan 2011, plainspeakit wrote:
I fear for the people – they might find they are hijacked by something even worse than the current tyrant.

As for Posting 4, dwangeddy, after the excesses of Slave Labour, we in Britain have already suffered under a tyranny.

Poor bastards don’t know what they’re in for. They’ll be begging – begging – for the return of Emergency Laws, censorship and summary imprisonment and torture of the regime’s political opponents.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 2:55 pm Furriner

I bet Prof. Hawkins is mighty relieved to get such support from a major intellectual. The line about scared illiterate people looking for answers is precious…
on 08 Feb 2011 at 2:56 pm Dipsomaniac Physics Student

It appears Jack watches lots of telly:

I think humans on Earth probably came from another world, could have been Mars, which was dying and colonized the Earth, the story of the Hebrew people could have more truth than the twist of invented religion, the Jewish people’s could probably have been the first to colonize and as the generations became illiterate took the colonization as being created by a god and being here was his promise to them as a safe haven, from the world left behind.

-And is such a weapons-grade cunt that he thinks BSG is a documentary; I wonder if he’s convinced that Arabs are in fact Cylons?
Still, it’s nice to imagine Jack unnerving his neighbours by intoning, “all this has happened before, and will happen again” from inside the shrubbery he’s rooting through searching for paedophiles while using the concealment of foliage to ogle sixth-formers’ tits.
it’s the sticky anorak stuffed with photos of Grace Park, thanks.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 3:02 pm HYS vs CiF

This guy isn’t as good as CKIGAB
on 08 Feb 2011 at 3:42 pm Kris

Old enough to remember 1967, but apparently not too old to wank over 16 and 17 year old girls.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 4:23 pm john Adair's Gerbil

@Kris – you’re never too old to…

Er, yeah, it’s the high-vis one with ASBO on the back.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 5:04 pm Webby

Facebook, CEOP, Jim Gamble, Operation Ore, Landslide, MySpace, Youtube all these and more are the worst thing to come out of the World Wide Web, WWW, .com and the afforemention the awful perverted face of what should have been the great liberator. The phenomenon of the Internet has shaped law in the UK in a way that has no relevance to reality and purely cosmetic legislation to accomodate the Web has been forced through here and in other countries, freedoms that were in place and had been for generations, swept away by the great “liberator” the Internet, in truth the Web has brought more censorship and curtailment of freedoms than liberation. This man who created the monster Facebook should be castigated not feted. I would never put my identity in this awful public arena, it is a place for perverts who look for kids to act out their sick fantasies and CEOP’s Gamble to occupy his time and satisfy his curiosity apying on people. A sas sas world now the Internet is with us, oh for olden days when we wrote letters and went shopping.

Then stop writing your fukkin useless screeds, you MASSIVE GAY SHITE.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 5:39 pm Ugly Newt

MASSIVE GAY SHITE

What makes you think he’s gay, and why do you mention it here?
on 08 Feb 2011 at 6:48 pm Dipsomaniac Physics Student

As AndyB has noted, Jack’s sexual interests appear to lie elsewhere:

Browns credentials were exposed for all to see with more draconian legislation forced onto the Statute Book last night, criminalising all who file share whether guilty or not, we are all now suspected paedophiles, sex abusers of fallen women and copyright crooks, what next Gordon, sex on ration?

It would be better than sex via Rohyponol, wouldn’t it?

so called “coerced” prostitute, a law that will be abused by the police, it is estimated that 1 in 10 men use prostitutes, meaning probably this affects 2,000,000 to 3,000,000, it is a cruel backward looking Act for those men who are disabled or have no hope of sexual release by having a loving relationship.

Not autobiographical in the slightest, of course.

you may have typed the dambable word “child” in the search engine or if you were looking for the DVD “Lolita” and type this word in, well you are doomed, you would probably get the “Thought” police bashing your door down at 6.00am and then carted off for a grilling,

I have just googled “child”, “Lolita” and “Googling “child’ and ‘Lolita’ according to HYS fucknut called Jack will result in your door being kicked in at 6:00am.” The consequences I shall await with interest. Should I fail to report in, you’ll know where to find me- Outside the local police station at dawn, strapped to a flaming barbeque with a Giger-designed electric snapping-toothed interrogation dildo stuck up my bottom.

the “Hysterical Capital” in the world for paedophillia, in any sense “Paedophile Nation”, this should attract all the perverts in the world who seek out this degrading practice.

Lonely this Christmas, were we?

. I believe in total sensual and sexual freedom, freedom to be naked whatever your age whereever you wish, freedom to sell your body in any way that is comfortable to yourself.

I’d try eBay.

ones 20′s is hideous. At 16 one can marry, leave home and make ones own life. All that needs clearing up now is the potty “Labour” law that makes a person who views or possess a nude image of a 16 or 17 year old a paedophile, sex offender and face up to 10 years in prison, this law is so illogical I personally can’t see it standing up in a Court Of Law.

Wonder if he’d care to try this-

Nanny State hideousy that crminalises those who posess or view images of Page3 type pics of 16 and 17 year olds.

-perhaps he has.

drugs and sex need a root and branch overhaul. IMO together with the afforemention the Age Of Consent should be lowered to 14 and the nonsense of men being criminalised as sex offenders who have a natural interesti sxually mature females

labels someone a paedophile, sex offender and who can be jailed for up to 10 years for viewing or possessing a “Page3″ image of a 16 or 17 year old is a typical knee jerk reaction to the Web

the nonsense of labelling a man a paedophile for viewing or posessing a nude image of a 16 or 17 year old girl reformed to the status quo

we’ve had banning of smoking in public places, damaging the Pub trade in particular, 16 and 17 year old girls banned from doing Page3, labelling men paedophiles and sex offenders who now possess or view this type of titilation, criminlisation threat of men using Brothels,

I may be wrong, but it appears Jack isn’t gay.
It’s the ‘GUNishment!’ windbreaker by the pitchfork rack, thanks.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 7:19 pm john Adair's Gerbil

The conjunction of his desire to be naked whenever and wherever he wants and the lowering of the age of consent to 14 makes the though of anything standing up in court pretty gruesome.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 7:33 pm Any Rand will do

jack’s contributed to the Sexism in Sport thread too:

The nonsense of this pathetic age we live in has no bounds, nature, normality, human traits and desires goes out of the window all sacrificed on the Altar of “political correctness”. Man has his role and woman has her role. Nature dictates man is the hunter and provides, woman bears children and keeps the nest, go against nature and for sure cheap jokes about men and women out of their natural realm are spoken. We have civilisation among humans, that doesn’t mean you can alter the mind to go against what is natural. This age of hideous litigious penalty for offending the crazy rules of a Society gone mad, hopefully will pass and common sense prevail.

It’s got a certain majesty, a lambency reminiscent of that part of Ecclesiastes that was turned into a hit song by The Byrds.

No. What am I talking about? It’s pure unmitigated cuntery. Ah well, this hideous pustule on the arse end of a Society gone mad, hopefully will pass away in a freak coercion accident.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 7:58 pm Ugeine

I love the ‘nature’ argument.

Especially considering it’s usually written by people who don’t tend to copulate with their grandmother or eat their young.
on 08 Feb 2011 at 8:09 pm Ugeine

Hang about, how does he work out the age of the girls in the ‘page three style’ pictures he’s not allowed to look at any more?

As a man of God, I wouldn’t know personally, but do pornographic pictures come with a blurb at the bottom stating the models age and name?

Or, is it that he owns some certain pictures of people he knows to be under eighteen and gets real pangs of guilt at the back of his head every time he ‘views’ them?

Answers on a postcard, please.

Make them out to:

Inspector Green
Child Pornography Unit
The Metropolitan Police HQ
New Scotland Yard
8-10 Broadway
London SW1H 0BG
on 08 Feb 2011 at 11:25 pm Undemocratic Speedbump

Old men should be either friendly people who make a coin appear from behind your ear and steal your nose, or, drunken, raving, and here’s the important part, technology-avoiding burnouts.

jack is ruining my worldview and my day.
on 09 Feb 2011 at 1:27 am Tweets that mention spEak You're bRanes » I’d Rather Fleetwood Mac -- Topsy.com

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by raggyguy, don't ask don't tell. don't ask don't tell said: So funny. But also terrifying… http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2011/02/08/id-rather-fleetwood-mac/ (via/@ultrafoetus) [...]
on 09 Feb 2011 at 8:36 am Sheepless

As a man of God, I wouldn’t know personally, but do pornographic pictures come with a blurb at the bottom stating the models age and name?

I don’t visit the sort of websites Jack probably frequents, but I’d guess the answer is yes, at least for the age. After all, if you’re determined to wank to pictures of schoolgirls, you wouldn’t want to accidently fap over a young-looking 20-year-old. That’d be horrible!
on 09 Feb 2011 at 11:33 am Bugrat

Nobody seems to have noticed this…

I didn’t know what sex was until I was 16 let alone why it existed..

..which might explain his fixation with 14-year-old girls, even if he did stand on his own feet from the age of 9.
on 09 Feb 2011 at 12:53 pm Oaf

“An unstable or at worst an Iranian influenced Egypt will lead to one thing, WW111″

I only know of two ‘world wars’, when did the other 108 happen?

111 – 2 = ???
on 09 Feb 2011 at 12:54 pm Oaf

I get it now. You’re not counting the one which hasn’t happened yet!
on 09 Feb 2011 at 2:14 pm Loumo

This “other planets” business. I can’t figure out whether it’s more likely that he’s a Scientologist (I would speculate as to whether that increases the odds of him liking the younger ladies, but they have very powerful lawyers so I’d like to make it clear there is NO CONNECTION), or whether he’s Icke in disguise, the kiddie stuff being a smokescreen (admittedly a somewhat overstated one) and he’s going to bring the whole lizard thing up in a few posts time.
on 09 Feb 2011 at 3:44 pm Inspector Green

Hello Hello Hello, anyone called Jack hang around these parts?
on 09 Feb 2011 at 3:55 pm Kris

I would speculate as to whether that increases the odds of him liking the younger ladies, but they have very powerful lawyers so I’d like to make it clear there is NO CONNECTION

All scientologists are paedos. They rape children on a daily basis. I also just googled ‘I want some fucking child porn right now’.

COME AT ME INTERNET POLICE.
on 09 Feb 2011 at 4:31 pm Inspector Lime

Green, you idiot. We’ve been infiltrating this site for years, gaining the trust of (and in one case, nearly sleeping with) the regulars, as part of our convoluted plan to track down and ensnare the thought-criminal known as “jack”. And now you come along and broadcast a warning the day before the dawn raid.
on 09 Feb 2011 at 6:52 pm Indigenous Pangaean

I’m intrigued as to why Jack’s airing his stained Hello Kitty laundry on HYS, rather than just hanging out with the other nonces on Frost?

Wait, Jack… Frost. He’s more devious than I thought.
on 09 Feb 2011 at 11:34 pm a Scientologist writes...

How dare you brutal scum perpetrate these lies!
Scientologists bum foxes- FACT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
on 09 Feb 2011 at 11:41 pm Tom Cruise

I bum foxes ….. and I LOVE internet anonymity …. F#$K YOU Scientology!!!111!
on 10 Feb 2011 at 12:19 am tw@basket.com

I saw that the article title was a reference to an execrable “song” by The Reynolds Girls and thought things couldn’t get any worse.

It did.
on 10 Feb 2011 at 10:12 am Tom Cruise

@tw@basket.com – don’t know what you mean, Fox Bumming is the greatest reason for becoming a Scientologist … shame you have to rim the corpse of LRH to get ascendancy to the glory that is fox bumming
on 10 Feb 2011 at 10:15 am Tom Cruise

Actually, now I think about it, the rimming was pretty great as well….

Revenimus

Wait, whats a “blah”?
on 10 Feb 2011 at 12:16 pm christonabike

Well you know what they say- “Jews are from Mars, the devil’s in Egypt”
on 10 Feb 2011 at 1:51 pm Has anyone seen my watch?

@Inspector Green:

There are specific ‘parts’ in particular in which Jack must have an interest. You should maybe check out the local girls school (where, I believe, the uniforms are colour coded so he knows who the Sixth Formers are…)
on 10 Feb 2011 at 2:25 pm Have Your Lurk

I can’t figure out why the thought police would want to beat down my door at 6am and cart it off for a grilling. They’ve got perfectly good doors down at the police station.
It’s the arrow-printed Platonic convict outfit, thanks.
on 10 Feb 2011 at 3:12 pm Johnny Rotten

Unfortunately, it’s not only the BBC who are guilty of this. Watch any programme, or any advertisement, and it has to be seen to have a black, white, or Asian in the line up. It is so contrived and so obvious and it’s also very patronising. People should be taken on for their talent, and not for their age, good looks, ethnic origin, gayness, or anything else. The people guilty of this must be crazy if they think the general public don’t notice exactly what is going in. It’s patently obvious.
- Wendy, Suffolk, 10/2/2011 9:04

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1355465/BBCs-Michael-Buerk-hits-televisions-political-correctness.html#ixzz1DZ5qA0Qt

If your a white heterosexual indigenous male, you would have a better chance of getting a job with the Taliban than the BBC. I think I will join up and stone a few gays.
on 10 Feb 2011 at 3:59 pm Have Your Lurk

Actually, Johnny, that’s a brilliant idea. Off you go and join the Taliban. I reckon you could sell stand tickets to an event like that.
on 10 Feb 2011 at 5:24 pm Johnny Rotten

Actually, Johnny, that’s a brilliant idea. Off you go and join the Taliban. I reckon you could sell stand tickets to an event like that.

Just got turned down, my beard is not long enough apparently, and the dont like “infidels”.
I shall be reporting this to the race relations board.
on 10 Feb 2011 at 6:35 pm Kris

it has to be seen to have a black, white, or Asian in the lineup

Yes, most adverts do have a black, white or asian person in them.
on 10 Feb 2011 at 6:41 pm Loumo

They’re constantly ignoring the rights of the silent purple-skinned majority. First they unleash that eater thing on us, then they drop us from their ads even though we’re everywhere.

I’m assuming your beard’s not long enough because your balls haven’t dropped yet, Johnny?
on 10 Feb 2011 at 7:00 pm Gordon Blimey

There’s loads of darkies on Top Gear these days. I also noticed a Gay on Songs of Praise AND it was dressed as a vicar!
on 10 Feb 2011 at 7:13 pm Indigenous Pangaean

What I want to know is what all the 14/88-types are doing watching the otherkin zerg-rush their TV ads, when there’s a RaHoWa to be won?

Frankly, I despair of modern racists. Lazy, lazy people.
on 10 Feb 2011 at 7:26 pm brager cunt

Johnny Rotten,

Are Huw Edwards, Jonathan Dimbleby, David Dimbleby, Jeremy Paxman, David Attenborough, Jeremy Clarkson, James May, Richard Hammond, Evan Davis, Alan Sugar, James Naughtie, John Humphrys, Nick Robinson, Eddie Mayer, Andrew Marr, Chris Evans, Chris Moyles, Tim Westwood, Adrian Chiles, Charlie Brooker, John Simpson, Matt Baker, Gary Lineker, Alan Hansen, Mark Lawrenson and Robert Peston all bizarre figments of my imagination?
on 10 Feb 2011 at 7:51 pm Indigenous Pangaean

@brager cunt

Now then, that Charlie Huq-Brooker’s essentially a race traitor, and as we know, it only takes one questionable item in a list to undermine the whole thing.

You can’t use logic on these people, and anyway I’m pretty sure that’s like some ancient foreign Greek shit.

Better to just point out that coming from an island with no natural predators is the eugenics of wimps.
on 10 Feb 2011 at 8:58 pm Have Your Lurk

Johnny, you got turned down by the Taliban? You mean they won’t take just any old racist fucktard?
on 10 Feb 2011 at 9:17 pm Ugeine

Unfortunately, it’s not only the BBC who are guilty of this. Watch any programme, or any advertisement, and it has to be seen to have a black, white, or Asian in the line up.

Nowadays, television is made up of two types of actors:

1) People who got there on their own merit and acting ability (whites)

2) DAAAAAARKIES!

Everyone knows that type 2) can’t act for shit (Anybody seen The Shawshank Redemption? That would have been such a great film if that bloody ~~black person~~ untalented actor hadn’t gone and talked all the way though it)

Once upon a time, television, that great leveller, only allowed people to appear on our screens if the person was a supremely talented actor. Look at Crossroads.

Somewhere down the line, crap actors (such as Asians and the Spanish) started complaining that this was unfair, so to pander to this minority, television started letting any old fools on.

Thankfully, though, occasionally, talent still makes it on to the screen. Interviewing supremo Lilly Allen was finally given her own chat show, for instance.
on 10 Feb 2011 at 9:21 pm Ugeine

Oh, and Johnny dear, you won’t get a job at the BBC for the same reason you won’t get a job at Tesco; you’re a tiresome cunt with absolutely nothing of value to offer anybody whatsoever.

It’s your fault for been a twat. Or maybe it’s our fault for been intolerant of twats.
on 11 Feb 2011 at 3:52 am Me Ed

Brager, hold on, you mean to say Tim Westwood’s really just a white bishop’s son for Lowestoft? I find that hard to believe.
on 11 Feb 2011 at 9:57 am My Pockets Hurt

The disgusting thing about that list of brager cunt’s is that at least one person on it is Welsh. And another to my certain knowledge is Jewish. Conclusive proof, I think you’ll agree, that the BBC is nothing more than an evil hive of politically correct fanatics disseminating Communist propaganda.
on 11 Feb 2011 at 11:16 am brager cunt

My Pockets Hurt

Don’t forget the Scots (Alan Hansen and Eddie Mayer) and the mentally handicapped one (Clarkson).

PC liberal loonies.
on 11 Feb 2011 at 11:58 am Ceannair

Are Huw Edwards, Jonathan Dimbleby, David Dimbleby, Jeremy Paxman, David Attenborough, Jeremy Clarkson, James May, Richard Hammond, Evan Davis, Alan Sugar, James Naughtie, John Humphrys, Nick Robinson, Eddie Mayer, Andrew Marr, Chris Evans, Chris Moyles, Tim Westwood, Adrian Chiles, Charlie Brooker, John Simpson, Matt Baker, Gary Lineker, Alan Hansen, Mark Lawrenson and Robert Peston all bizarre figments of my imagination

Imagination ? Fuck – how much cheese would you have to eat before bed to phantom up that lot ???

Btw, Lawrenson’s one of my lot too – begorrah we’re on der telly!
on 11 Feb 2011 at 12:37 pm brager cunt

Ceannair

Hmm – Lawro was born and raised in the North West – only really a Paddy in footballing terms.
on 11 Feb 2011 at 1:41 pm Ceannair

Ceannair

Hmm – Lawro was born and raised in the North West – only really a Paddy in footballing terms.

An excellent point and to be honest we don’t want him!

But you know what these NF muppets are like – there’s brown folk who are 4th/5th generation English and they consider them foreign!

Just to help the mentally challenged you know.
on 11 Feb 2011 at 1:44 pm KnockyKnock

Lawro was born and raised in the North West – only really a Paddy in footballing terms

He still did a great job tarmac’ing my drive though…
on 11 Feb 2011 at 3:20 pm Indigenous Pangaean

He’s at it again….

At 12:46pm on 11 Feb 2011, jack wrote:
Freedom! what a joke. Where is the freedom when we have a mishmash of cobbled together draconian laws realating to prostitution, the (unique to the UK) laws on so called indecent images, where is the civilized approach to the former, where is the open freedom of artist expression to the latter. Until these areas of life and many, many others are addressed, this so called “Freedom Bill” is a weak travesty of what is really needed, a Bill Of Rights.

…is he using Bill Of Rights in some sense with which I’m unfamiliar?
on 11 Feb 2011 at 4:48 pm Have Your Lurk

Yes, he means the Bill of jack’s Rights to See Only White People on Telly and shag loads of indigenous homogenous birds. Like wrens,
on 11 Feb 2011 at 6:11 pm Loumo

So do most political issues come back to what Jack can and can’t do vis-a-vis his cock then? Is he pro or anti more freedom for Egypt, given that loads of birds with fancy eye makeup probably live there, but they’re darkies?
on 11 Feb 2011 at 6:18 pm Turd-Fast

Paedophile Nation UK

That sounds like a cheaper, shittier version of an American TV program.

When I hear HYSers, and also analysts in mainstream media organisations, talking about Egypt I am intrigued, I have to admit. However, it is similar to my thoughts on Chinese poultry farmers in Angola. I am always preoccupied asking “how did they end up there?”. It is like watching a welsh miner singing Kum Bah Ya in a Tibetan monastery. Nothing wrong with it, it is just no matter how well he performs the song, you will always be thinking “what the fuck”.
on 11 Feb 2011 at 6:23 pm Indigenous Pangaean

@loumo Alas, jack’s opinion on Egypt is almost entirely predictable…

At 7:41pm on 10 Feb 2011, jack wrote:
Bring on the “brotherhood”, bring on the new “i”slamic “s”tate, Iran must be brimming with anticipation and ready to move, as the isalmists surround Israel. A new dangerous order is being formed before our eyes, the weakness of the Western economies and islamic terrorists seemingly on every street corner, a new and very frightening era is about to begin, lets hope it doesn’t perpetuate a World War. Mubarak the last brick in the damn holding back the tide of the islamic tide!

Predictable, if incoherent.
on 11 Feb 2011 at 6:33 pm Undemocratic Speed Bump

lets hope it doesn’t perpetuate a World War. Mubarak the last brick in the damn holding back the tide of the islamic tide!

Incoherency at its best. ‘Perpetuate’ is correct, but struggles with the word ‘dam’, which phonetically must be one of the easiest words to spell.

Furthermore, how many dams are built of bricks, and how many of them hold back tides of tides. We should be told.
on 11 Feb 2011 at 6:35 pm Loumo

So non-cock related, unless the quotes round the i of “i”slamic and s of “s”tate mean something other than being a kind of shorthand knobjockey alert. Ah well. Maybe he’s not seen Carry On Cleo yet.
on 11 Feb 2011 at 7:31 pm john Adair's Gerbil

Ah, “Carry on Cleo”. I shall avoid the “Infamy! Infamy! They’ve all got it in for me!” quote and recall instead the opening scene, with the Roman legion marching. “Sinister, Dexter, Sinister, Dexter…”

Yeah, it’s the brass chest plate with “Ecce Romaini” on the back, ta.
on 11 Feb 2011 at 7:57 pm ad ho

Mubarak has just quit – withdrawn the finger from the “d”ike that was holding back the new era of the World War Forever era. Somewhere in the depths of space, a wizened starjew grimaces and slowly shakes his head.
on 11 Feb 2011 at 8:51 pm Pete Tong

Mubarak has just quit – withdrawn the finger from the “d”ike that was holding back the new era of the World War Forever era. Somewhere in the depths of space, a wizened starjew grimaces and slowly shakes his head.

The age of the jew is over, time now for the Palistinians to reclaim their homeland and for all arabs to kick the thieving yanks out of mecca.
A new age of properity for all.
on 11 Feb 2011 at 11:17 pm Kris

Did anyone see Glenn Beck say without irony that he doesn’t support the overthrow of Mubarak because the Egyptians simply aren’t of the same calibre as the (hard working, white) America Revolutionaries? Good it was.
on 11 Feb 2011 at 11:54 pm Indigenous Pangaean

I like the way Glenn Beck even makes Alex Jones angry. Well, everything makes Alex Jones angry, but I like the particular flavour of this rage.
on 12 Feb 2011 at 2:53 am Bugrat

..with the Roman legion marching. “Sinister, Dexter, Sinister, Dexter…”

Always liked that bit myself, that and the portrayal of the indigenous inhabitants as palaeolithic cave-dwellers.
on 12 Feb 2011 at 12:34 pm Turdfrank

Did anyone see Glenn Beck say without irony that he doesn’t support the overthrow of Mubarak because the Egyptians simply aren’t of the same calibre as the (hard working, white) America Revolutionaries? Good it was.

Beck: Egyptian ptotest was a “Marxist Communist” plot, a conspiracy between Code Pink, Hamas, and the Muslim Brotherhood.

I like good, plausible conspiracy theories, but the right-wing are always going to struggle; impoverished, unemployed Arabs conniving to control the world supply of Egyptian giros?
on 12 Feb 2011 at 2:57 pm Have Your Lurk

When you think about it, Mubarak lasted longer than quite a lot of pharaohs.
on 12 Feb 2011 at 8:43 pm john Adair's Gerbil

Beck’s a cockwomble’s cockwomble.

Sadly, there’s a lot of cockwombles who believe his cockwombelry.
on 12 Feb 2011 at 9:13 pm Ugeine

A whole 350,000 of them, bugger all.

Compare it to the 10 million brits which watch Eastdenders, which makes just as depressing viewing.
on 12 Feb 2011 at 9:14 pm Ugeine

True, you’re less likely to encounter conspiracies about Muslims but more likely to encounter live husband burying.
on 12 Feb 2011 at 11:48 pm Pete Tong

Sorry, Mr Saqui, but the sense of humour left Britain a long time ago! More power to your blackboard!! (oops, meant chalkboard of course!!)
- Jill, Valencia, Spain, 12/2/2011 14:11

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1356245/Hotel-owner-sparks-anger-putting-provocative-sign-declaring-Poofters-welcome.html#ixzz1Dmsi9U52

I prefer Johnny Rottens sign “no Irish, no balcks no dogs” actually.
on 12 Feb 2011 at 11:49 pm Pete Tong

Balcks!! well, at least the blacks wont sue me now!
on 13 Feb 2011 at 4:00 am Sir Alf Ramsey's Porn Dungeon and Stage school

“i”slamic “s”tate

… I may be wrong, but isn’t this the kind of thing Twig Clark might say … quite sure he has a lisp.

Think of it…
on 13 Feb 2011 at 7:17 am HYS vs CiF

@Turd-Fast

I take it you saw “The Chinese are coming” last week. What’s there to understand? The Chinese farmers are there for the same reason we have expats. The chance of a better life. Opportunities. He explained quite clearly that competition is intense in China… so he’s moving to Africa, at least for a while until the locals go mental.
on 13 Feb 2011 at 10:05 am Burge-a-tron

I know he’s still out by a few world wars but let’s give Jack them benefit of the doubt.
As a respected academic that hangs out with Stephen Hawkins, he was probably using binary.
WW111 = world war seven.
on 13 Feb 2011 at 1:58 pm Johnny Rotten

What a world the Liberals have created for us, we cannot give our youth a clip around the ear, when they misbehave badly, yet we tolerate this in schools in our own country. Schools which are only good for training the next wave of suicide bombers to decimate our society further and give even more power to the corporate elite.

It makes me want to weep – not for myself, but for my grandfather who risked his life during WW2 – he must be turning in his grave for how many young soldiers lost their lives to keep our country great – WE SHOULD BE ASHAMED!!!!!
- Alex, London, 13/2/2011 0:04
Click to rate Rating 3417

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1356361/Shame-Britains-Muslim-schools-Secret-filming-shows-pupils-beaten.html#ixzz1DqLfmsBn

That Tazeen Ahmad is a bit tasty though!
on 13 Feb 2011 at 3:46 pm Professor Craig

All in favour of brown people being allowed to rule themselves.

Gainsborough is on the other side since he is supporting the line that western government, media & assorted beeboids are entitled, indeed have a duty, to lecture them on how they should establish the sort of system that makes Britain what it is today, even though their knowledge of local conditions may, arguably, be less than that of the locals.

Incidentally where were all these local supporters of “democracy” for the last 30 years regarding Egypt or even now when denouncing the Saudi feudalists isn’t yet fashionable.
on 13 Feb 2011 at 7:05 pm Ed aka TOO MANY EDS WE NEED A CULL

Boring paedos are boring. Do one.
on 13 Feb 2011 at 10:54 pm Dipsomaniac Physics Student

‘i Am A Member Of A Civilisation.’
- David Brin
You should join up sometime, Neil. Until you do, you are missing all the parties- In every sense.
I pity you.
on 13 Feb 2011 at 11:59 pm Pete Tong

‘i Am A Member Of A Civilisation.’
- David Brin
You should join up sometime, Neil. Until you do, you are missing all the parties- In every sense.
I pity you.

Yes and you cool dudes are so with it, putting down anyone who dares to use the internet as a forum to speak up against the injustices of the world. lets be witty whilst the Eton educated wankers (sorry bankers) take us all to the cleaners, downgrading the standard of living for all but the few who both (man and wife) or dual partnership for the gays, work all hours god sends to pay the mortgage on their rabbit hutch, to have it taken off them at age 55, when they have a stroke trying to meet their latest performance review.
on 14 Feb 2011 at 12:18 am Kris

wankers (sorry bankers)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

As hilarious as that line is (because, you see, they rhyme…classic!), he’s got a point. Come on everyone, let’s put on our Serious Faces and talk about Serious Business. Let me try first;

I had an interview at the BBC once, obviously the stinking lefties chose a black over me tofill their ‘yooman rights’ quota
-Cuntfacedwankstain, England, EUSSR

Hoho, good luck finding a job without blacking up first! Maybe put on a burkha, they’ll hire you on the spot!

…was that ok? Did I do it right? Man this fighting global injustice stuff is hard.
on 14 Feb 2011 at 12:25 am Kris

Just out of curiosity, though, I would like to know how taking the piss out of an old pervert who doesn’t trust brown people to have a democracy because they might use it to hit Israel can possibly be an indication that ‘Gainsborough’(..?!) is parroting some sort of media line.
on 14 Feb 2011 at 11:33 am Master-of-Turd

HYS vs CiF,

I take it you saw “The Chinese are coming” last week. What’s there to understand?

The farmers were economic migrants selling chickens below the market price in already cheap markets. What is there to understand other than the “the Chinese are [invading]” Africa and sometimes annoying the natives?

JR, in his random rummage through the tabloids, stumbled across the treasure trove.

surely there are British laws broken here , where is Britain these days ?

Andrew, ex pat, Paris – one of Britain’s greatest exports.
on 14 Feb 2011 at 12:21 pm Sir Alf Ramsey's Porn Dungeon

Surely there are British laws broken here , where is Britain these days ?

Andrew, ex pat, Paris – one of Britain’s greatest exports.

…. and finest geographers…
on 14 Feb 2011 at 12:21 pm Sir Alf Ramsey's Porn Dungeon

…yup, thought I’d f#$k up ‘em nested blockquotes
on 14 Feb 2011 at 2:12 pm sometimes

blah blah blah blah blah blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. Adair blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
on 14 Feb 2011 at 2:53 pm Ceannair

Good point.
on 14 Feb 2011 at 2:54 pm Undemocratic Speed Bump

@sometimes

Far more concise than Professor Craig, I must say. And wittier. And more informative.
on 15 Feb 2011 at 10:50 am Hippocrocopig

Oi Oi!

KELLY Brook has posed naked with her breasts and body smeared in red lipstick for a set of shocking full-frontal photos.
The 21 images – for an arty magazine – are said to be “feminist, industrial, and political”.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/3411874/Kelly-Brook-bares-all-for-arty-magazine-Exhibition.html
on 15 Feb 2011 at 4:11 pm Have Your Lurk

I’ll brook no, um, something.
on 15 Feb 2011 at 11:50 pm Ugeine

Yes and you cool dudes are so with it, putting down anyone who dares to use the internet as a forum to speak up against the injustices of the world

Aaaaah, bless you! Nobodies listening, you tawdry cunt, give it a rest.
on 16 Feb 2011 at 2:08 am Antigone

Actually, bless Jack for his belief that “mayhem” will be “magnified many times” in reality and not just in his strange, hyperbolic, over-active imagination.

One day I’d like to sit and watch the news with Jack.
on 16 Feb 2011 at 10:23 am My Pockets Hurt

Did the right acts with the Brit Awards?

Challis doesn’t know:

Since I did not watch the Brit Awards I couldn’t possibly say.

Worth of the blessed St Catherine herself. I’d say.

However ….

Just one question though, if foreign acts are allowed to enter it, why is it called the “Brit” Awards?

Oh, Challis. You were doing so well, but then you blew it by mentioning the forrins.
on 16 Feb 2011 at 10:25 am My Pockets Hurt

“With”? I meant “win”, of course.

It’s the tracksuit top with the “Niek” badge on, thanks.
on 16 Feb 2011 at 2:00 pm Loumo

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/cartoon/2011/feb/16/clare-in-the-community-brighton-rock

Sorry, I know it’s irrelevant, but it made me happy so I felt the need to share.
on 16 Feb 2011 at 2:28 pm Turdface

BBC bringing up the theme “How can we encourage new scientists?”

Subjects such as maths, physics, chemistry and so on are far too difficult. And as such pupils might not get very good grades in these subjects. And if they get poor grades it might upset them, so it’s better for pupils to study easy subjects where they will all get an A* grade.

We could analyse your statement, break it down into its components, formalise the pretty obvious assumptions to create an hypothesis which could be tested empirically. But, no what we need is more science.

Take a leaf out of oglidewell.

By letting kids do fun experiments. Let them blow things up, let them give themselves electric shocks, let them play with van de Graaf generators and light bunsen burners with their fingers. My chemistry and physics teachers did the above, and I loved it. Nobody ever, ever got hurt.

Why do we need science? To blow up shit. Straight to the point, no fucking about, no haughty attitude. Perfect response.
on 16 Feb 2011 at 5:20 pm Dipsomaniac Physics Student

@Turdface; I see your two imbecilic clitwibbles, and I raise with-

342. At 2:11pm on 16 Feb 2011, quake wrote:
To improve science in this country we need another world war

Never mind just blowing stuff up, eh? “We had to destroy the planet in order to save it… ”

138. At 3:28pm on 15 Feb 2011, Vincent wrote:
Contrary to the Beeb’s assumption that Science is something entirely good, I must report to believing that many or most scientific ideas appear to have made life much worse and much harder for today’s human being than it was a century ago. E.g., so-called improvements in healthcare & medicine have increased the numbers of elderly to be looked after, while contraception & abortion have seriously reduced the numbers of young people available for work, which in turn has resulted in a politically traumatic surge in unwanted immigration, which will inevitably lead to a war of some kind.
Science of course IS great at making weapons, as the people of Hiroshima & Nagasaki will tell you. A wonderful achievement!
If you are going to educate young people in science then you should introduce ethics by default. As it is science generally appears to have no ethics, nor morals, just four mathematical priciples, add, subtract, divide & multiply… all very interesting for brains wearing rubber gloves.
Perhaps it would be better for future generations if society dissuades students from studying science and instead, tries to make decent people of them instead, which I though was the purpose of education.

Cunts, cunts everywhere and not one of ‘em can think.
on 16 Feb 2011 at 6:52 pm Loumo

I like that the improvements in medicine are only so-called, and yet they’re good enough that they’ve left us with a load of owd giffers knocking about.

I also, as a nerd, am intersted to note that the whole of mathematics can be reduced to four operations. It seems to have been simplified somewhat since my university days, but that may be due to the austerity cuts or the EU interfering again or something.
on 16 Feb 2011 at 6:54 pm Professor Craig

“the Beeb’s assumption that Science is something entirely good”

????

Would this be the same corrupt racist BBC that says the evidence that we are experiencing catastrophic warming is better than the evidence that Newton was right about apples?
on 17 Feb 2011 at 9:48 am My Pockets Hurt

contraception & abortion have seriously reduced the numbers of young people available for work

Yes, to the point where one in five is out of work. I’m sure it used to be much, much more than that before that pesky science intervened.
on 17 Feb 2011 at 10:34 am Johnny Rotten

Would this be the same corrupt racist BBC that says the evidence that we are experiencing catastrophic warming is better than the evidence that Newton was right about apples?

The UK, the only country in the EU where pensioners freeze to death because their meagre state pension as all gone on global warming taxes added to their fuel bills.

As for Newton, It is very interesting that all solidity on earth is made up of atoms which in turn are made up of sub atomic particles which in turn are made up of energy vibrating at a particular rate/frequency. At the sub atomic level there is no such thing as solid as we experience it and it is only our brains that decode impulses sent there from our infinatly limited five senses. At our purest state we are beings of energy decoding and experiencing the illusion of a solid world. Is the purpose of all this to simply allow ones consciousness to experience the reality its “solid” vehicle/body decodes?;

So Newton was talking rot with his theory of gravity.
on 17 Feb 2011 at 11:01 am Loumo

You can’t be “infinitely limited”, and solidity is caused by the interaction of the energies and is not merely a construct of our minds. I agree that everything’s made up of discrete particles with a lot of space and it’s quite a shock when you first think about it, but even so: solidity is real, monkey boy.

For Hawking’s sake, if you’re going to try to read a science book and get all over-excited all over your screen can you ask someone to check your pseudo-scientific psychobabble before you type it, please?
on 17 Feb 2011 at 11:02 am Puppy Sandwich

If there’s no such thing as “solid”, how do pensioners freeze?
on 17 Feb 2011 at 11:04 am Have Your Lurk

Proof, if it were needed, that a little knowledge is very definitely a bad thing.
on 17 Feb 2011 at 11:12 am Ceannair

Ah it’s love.

Johnny and Craigy sitting in a tree…. preferably with two big fucking nooses.
on 17 Feb 2011 at 11:15 am Mother Teresa

contraception & abortion have seriously reduced the numbers of young people available for work

I blame that pesky Richard Dawkins.
on 17 Feb 2011 at 12:01 pm Johnny Rotten

contraception & abortion have seriously reduced the numbers of young people available for work

Which country do you live in? we have a couple of million of them here in the UK you can have. All their futures have been ruined by a shambolic education system which will give you 8 GCSE grade A’s and three A levels without the ability to spell your own name or count up to 10.
All our jobs are taken up by immigrants who are willing to work all hours for £5.30 an hour in a country where the average house price is 165K and you have to work your first one and a halve weeks per month just to pay your monthly council tax bill.
on 17 Feb 2011 at 12:40 pm Ceannair

one and a halve weeks

It’s “half” you fetid fungally infected ferret’s fanny.

Shambolic education indeed.
on 17 Feb 2011 at 1:07 pm Have Your Lurk

Gosh! Competition from those pesky darkies, what next! Next thing you know they’ll be voting and seducing our women. Oh, wait – they already are!! You couldn’t make it up. Fact!!
on 17 Feb 2011 at 1:29 pm Puppy Sandwich

I don’t know where Johnny Rotten lives. My council tax bill is £77 ten months out of every twelve. I suppose giving oral sex to truckers obviously doesn’t pay that much, and that’s why Johnny struggles with his bills.
on 17 Feb 2011 at 1:29 pm strangelyquiet

“Johnny and Craigy sitting in a tree…. preferably with two big fucking nooses”

Isn’t the plural ‘nieces’?

And if so, what are J & C up a tree with the fat lasses for?
on 17 Feb 2011 at 1:58 pm Atom Antsy

Aww, bless. Isn’t it sweet when the resident trolls learn to read and write. They’ve just stumbled upon this entirely new concept called ‘science’ and they’re all over it like a rash!

Now, for your next lesson, here’s a spelling exercise. Write out “I am a racist bigoted cunt”. Repeat and memorise.
on 17 Feb 2011 at 3:20 pm Johnny Rotten

I don’t know where Johnny Rotten lives. My council tax bill is £77 ten months out of every twelve. I suppose giving oral sex to truckers obviously doesn’t pay that much, and that’s why Johnny struggles with his bills.

My council tax bill is £140 per month ten months a year and I am lucky enough to earn about 4 times the minimum wage, I can only assume I live in a much better area tahn you, despite my bad spelling.
For minimum wagers and pensioners the cost of council tax is an outrage, but the benefit underclass who thrive in free council houses have no such problems.
on 17 Feb 2011 at 4:31 pm Ceannair

I’ll regret taking this tack but here goes.

Saying you have to work “x amount of time” to pay something is an absolute pile of shite.

I earn about €2,100 a month. I’d have to work one week and four days to pay my rent.

So ????

Rotten Johnny, you are once again proved to be a cunt of the fucking highest order.
on 17 Feb 2011 at 7:09 pm Kris

4 times minimum wage? Fuck me Johnny, I thought it was us who were the spoilt clueless middle class lefties who don’t know what it’s like on da streets?

By the way, that ‘science’ is Icke rearing his mental head again, if I’m right.
on 17 Feb 2011 at 7:56 pm One Wheel on my Wagon

Rotten Johnny. The minimum wage for someone over 21 is £5.93 I think. If you are on 4 times that amount as you say and assumng you work full time of 7 hours a day then you are getting close to £40K per year. When you are barking about the establihment, you very likely are the establishment at that rate. If you are under 19 then it is £2.50 then that is still nearly £17K and a fit young man could earn loads more with an extra job.
on 17 Feb 2011 at 8:44 pm Have Your Lurk

I’m an immigrant, and I reckon I support an entire Italian family on benefits with my taxes. Probably two.
on 18 Feb 2011 at 10:48 am ET, NYC

I’m a legal alien.
on 18 Feb 2011 at 11:18 am Ugly Newt

By the way, that ‘science’ is Icke rearing his mental head again, if
I’m right.

It was also posted by “US Citizen 07″, who may or may not be Icke, at
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSHQAVDFU98JOH5C2/post271580

Johnny just added some typos to give it the personal touch.
on 18 Feb 2011 at 11:20 am Sting, NYC

So am I.
on 18 Feb 2011 at 11:40 am Dipsomaniac Physics Student

Browsing the archived ‘Your Freedom’ site, one feels it should have been named ‘Your Rage Wank,’ or ‘Your Cortex Scrapings.’ The titles alone are priceless:

29. Don’t let a few perverts strangle society

Repeal of water fluoridation laws

50. Create Money

Capital Punishment For Illegal Parking…

Ration Books for those on Benefits
by sharonyfs on July 07, 2010 at 10:08PM

Never mind finding a set of consecutive fuckblurts:

1. EU Membership
2. by NickEllis on August 16, 2010 at 12:42PM
8. CIVIL RIGHTS TO BE DENIED THOSE WHO BREAK THE LAW
9. by MarkO on August 16, 2010 at 12:
15. Human Rights act
16. by nigeljackson1 on August 15, 2010 at 01:31PM
22. Spending cuts on sectors that can’t take it, yet money wasted elsewhere
23. by Conor on August 15, 2010 at 01:59AM
•
29. Restore Capital Punishment
30. by GiniA on August 14, 2010 at 09:44PM
36. Stop Ridiculous Wastes of Tax Payer’s Money
37. by MartyMcFly on August 13, 2010 at 12:48PM
43. Bring in legislation to make strikes not in the national interest illegal
44. by tyler on August 12, 2010 at 09:16PM

And then I found this.

Free Speech Against Feminism

by Lew354 on July 26, 2010 at 08:16PM
Why do I ask for this?

Because challenging the flawed dogma of feminism is BARRED on national television.

Feminism is one of the most IDIOTIC doctrines to date. And the only reason it has survived until now is because challenging it on our national television channels like the BBC is censored.

Let’s see a BBC or Channel 4 programme debating the issue of feminism. Let’s see sociologist/authors Warren Farrell, Rich Zubaty, Stephen Baskerville, to name just a few, in a studio discussion with celebrity feminists and see who talks sense and who talks the usual excruciating drivel.

But moreover, feminism is biggest single cause of Britain’s insufferable authoritarianism:

1. Feminists want the presumption of innocence ditched for men accused of rape.

2. The scrapping of the double jeopardy rule for murder was later extended to cover areas of interest to feminists (such as sex crime).

3. The police are now involved in domestic scenarios. Why? Because feminist propaganda has created the false belief that men are the sole perpetrators in domestic violence cases. However, studies are now showing that women are as violent, with some of these even suggesting they are MORE violent than men in the home. Yet the police and government social services departments take no interest violent wives/mothers. Feminism.

4. There are significant numbers of female paedophiles molesting boys, yet we only ever hear (in the media) about men. This is feminism dominating the media.

5. Men and women have enormous differences in their intelligence patterns. This accounts for why all the great innovators and inventors thoughout history, all the scientists, artists, philosophers, and poets, have been MEN. (The achievements of women in these endeavours shrink to nothing next to men’s.) Yet the media is concerned with getting more GIRLS into universities instead of boys. This is feminism — this time stifling the advancement of boys in favour of their own favoured group of people: women. Authoritarianism. Boys are suffering.

This debate is a BIG one. I have only scratched the surface. There is now a massive anti-feminist movement — the Men’s Movement — that is worldwide. But you would never know it watching the British news or reading a British newspaper.

Isn’t that shameful?

Well, at the moment I feel ashamed to (a) own a willy, (b) share some of the same genes as this rabid rat’s rancid ringpiece. I wonder if he teams up with Govt_Helper to write fan mail to Peter Sutcliffe, in between angry-fucking a rubber doll?
Fuck these people.
on 18 Feb 2011 at 3:17 pm Johnny Rotten

Free Speech Against Feminism

by Lew354 on July 26, 2010 at 08:16PM
Why do I ask for this?

Because challenging the flawed dogma of feminism is BARRED on national television.

Feminism is one of the most IDIOTIC doctrines to date. And the only reason it has survived until now is because challenging it on our national television channels like the BBC is censored.

Let’s see a BBC or Channel 4 programme debating the issue of feminism. Let’s see sociologist/authors Warren Farrell, Rich Zubaty, Stephen Baskerville, to name just a few, in a studio discussion with celebrity feminists and see who talks sense and who talks the usual excruciating drivel.

But moreover, feminism is biggest single cause of Britain’s insufferable authoritarianism:

1. Feminists want the presumption of innocence ditched for men accused of rape.

2. The scrapping of the double jeopardy rule for murder was later extended to cover areas of interest to feminists (such as sex crime).

3. The police are now involved in domestic scenarios. Why? Because feminist propaganda has created the false belief that men are the sole perpetrators in domestic violence cases. However, studies are now showing that women are as violent, with some of these even suggesting they are MORE violent than men in the home. Yet the police and government social services departments take no interest violent wives/mothers. Feminism.

4. There are significant numbers of female paedophiles molesting boys, yet we only ever hear (in the media) about men. This is feminism dominating the media.

5. Men and women have enormous differences in their intelligence patterns. This accounts for why all the great innovators and inventors thoughout history, all the scientists, artists, philosophers, and poets, have been MEN. (The achievements of women in these endeavours shrink to nothing next to men’s.) Yet the media is concerned with getting more GIRLS into universities instead of boys. This is feminism — this time stifling the advancement of boys in favour of their own favoured group of people: women. Authoritarianism. Boys are suffering.

This debate is a BIG one. I have only scratched the surface. There is now a massive anti-feminist movement — the Men’s Movement — that is worldwide. But you would never know it watching the British news or reading a British newspaper.

Isn’t that shameful?

Any argument against feminism can be summed up in two words:-

Harriet Harman

nuff said
on 18 Feb 2011 at 5:12 pm Ugly Newt

Yes, Johnny. Because every feminist is *exactly* the same as Harriet Harman.
on 18 Feb 2011 at 5:24 pm t'otherone

@ Dipsomaniac Physics Student

I feel ashamed to (a) own a willy

I wondered who had out-bid me for that….
on 18 Feb 2011 at 7:04 pm Dipsomaniac Physics Student

I was desperate.
on 19 Feb 2011 at 2:07 am Feminist cunt

“Any argument against feminism can be summed up in two words:-

Harriet Harman

nuff said”

Been listening to ’nuff’ for long?
on 19 Feb 2011 at 10:05 am Have Your Lurk

I think that’s fairy ’nuff.l
on 19 Feb 2011 at 2:43 pm Puppy Sandwich

Harriet Harman is, however, an argument against Harriet Harman.
on 19 Feb 2011 at 4:20 pm High-Lord-Turdforth-of-Basingstoke

Here we are again folks. Benefit culture. BBC HYS asks “why are there people who do not work?”.

Interestingly, the mood is changing on HYS, a lot less “kill the wasters”, still the residual “imigrunts to blame”, and a few odder comments…

You should stop single mums on benefits having more children by only paying for up to 2 children this may stop them having more kids to claim more money unemployed people given council / housing association properties should do voluntary work to help with there rent Instead of giving single young mums under the age of 21 council / housing ass properties there should be mother & baby hostels set up (this would save more properties for families that need somewhere to live no just having babies to get housed ( maybe have less single mums in the long run) and no males staying on the property .. set up boot camps this would get alot of people off the dole and working for boot camps for kids from age 14 – 21 i feel a short sharp shock would maybe prevent them from reoffending

I have to say, I would love to read about this housing ass proposal in more detail. He feels a short sharp shock?
on 20 Feb 2011 at 1:45 am RIPOFF BRITIAN

should do voluntary work to help with there rent

Voluntary work pays.

I like his progression from “let them work for free for a council home” to “stick them in a concentration camp” in the same bamboozling sentence.

Cunt.
on 21 Feb 2011 at 3:16 am Charlotte L

I have to say, I would love to read about this housing ass proposal in more detail.

I think I saw something on Stewart Lee’s show about that…
on 21 Feb 2011 at 10:20 am Dipsomaniac Physics Student

Oh dear.
‘Does the Blue badge scheme need reform?’

3. At 11:44am on 14 Feb 2011, John Mc wrote:
Yes it needs reform, the amount of large 4x4s and executive cars that seem to have them is laughable. To qualify you should required to have an adapted car, for wheelchair, or a small car such as seen in Europe that holds two persons and has a small 800cc diesel engine.

John Mc has hewed straight to the heart of this national scandal- The disgusting notion that disabled people may have more money than he does- they’re even allowed jobs! And families! Which means they’ll breed and make more not-quite humans! it’s a disgrace, isn’t it John? It’s just like the darkies and poofters and the fucking women all over again. I feel your pain. ‘Mc’ is short for McKnobhead, isn’t it?

63. At 1:31pm on 14 Feb 2011, j davies wrote:
I agree that the blue badge is definitely abused and that many people have them that should not. The only justification in my opinion is for people in wheelchairs. Surely people who are only slightly disabled should be encouraged to walk to keep their bodies moving and stops things seizing up. Walking with a limp or with crutches does not warrant a blue badge. I have myself borrowed a blue badge when going to the hospital as an emergency or routine appointment as a disagree fiercly with having to pay to park at a hospital nothing to do with having to walk any distance.

The parent todler parking is also a joke – you are not ill you only have children – walk, the exercise is good for you!!!!!!!!!

You may think that j davies is a cunt, and you may be right; he may be so dim-witted that you’ve steamed more intellectual carrots, and so unpleasant that you’d rather claim kinship with Muammar Gaddafi’s solid wastes- but consider this:
At the end of life, when j davies reflects on how he ended up lying in an alley clad in piss-soaked rags, one gleaming certainty will sustain him as he cuts his wrist open lengthways with a rusty Stanley knife, and it will be the last coherent thought as his system shuts down forever: For a shining moment he got one over on everyone, even those spoilt crippled bastards. None of us will be able to say that.

239. At 8:37pm on 14 Feb 2011, Dave wrote:
I cannot understand why disabled people are allowed to drive in the first place. Surely they are a driving hazzard if they are so bad at driving that they need allocated parking.

We live in a humane society, wherein individuals of inferior quality are accepted, even cherished. if not, the likes of Dave would have been shoved into a brick-festooned sack and hurled into the nearest canal the moment society realised what a worthless wombat’s wang-wart he is.
on 21 Feb 2011 at 11:07 am Have Your Lurk

Here in Italy if you’re handicapped you can have the nearest parking spot to your home designated as a handicapped spot, for your use. One rather witty owner of such a spot hung a sign under the official sign which said:

“Want my parking spot? Take my handicap.”

Shuts people up.
on 21 Feb 2011 at 12:40 pm Turd-Police

Surely people who are only slightly disabled should be encouraged to walk to keep their bodies moving and stops things seizing up.

Although we could debate whether the automobile a curse or blessing for mankind, the current argument does not even appear to be if j davies can shave off twenty minutes in a journey for treatment on the mwide variety of his rage-wank symptoms, but whether he can save a couple of quid for a space reserved for those with mobility problems in a busy hospital car park.

I love this jeremyclarkson line of arguing, which Dave just takes to its logical conclusion “why should disabled people drive when most of them have shit cars?”
on 21 Feb 2011 at 3:35 pm D Cameron

As I require lots of taxes to keep my second home going and my friends in the banks need lots of taxes to bail them out to keep their bonuses at all time record highs, I suggest we work the proles 90 hours a week on the minimum wage and any disabled are shot like race horses is they are unable to work all hours to fill my bag of tax swag.

OOOPS, wrong website!!!
on 21 Feb 2011 at 7:08 pm Have Your Lurk

No, it’s the right website. Can I interest you in some penis enlargement lotion?
on 21 Feb 2011 at 8:57 pm Puppy Sandwich

While I’ve never been in a wheel chair, I still feel qualified in voicing my opinion on the matter loudly and obnoxiously. Surely it’s actually easier to get about in a wheel chair than on crutches or with a walking stick. I mean; they’ve got wheels! And they can fucking sit down! They’ve got it easy.

"If you love Syria so much..
why don't you go live there?"

150 Responses to “I’d Rather Fleetwood Mac”

About

Search

Contributors

Tags

Archives

Pages

spEak You're bRanes

"If you love Syria so much.. why don't you go live there?"

150 Responses to “I’d Rather Fleetwood Mac”

About

Search

Contributors

Tags

Archives

Pages

"If you love Syria so much..
why don't you go live there?"