Curtain Twitchers and Outsiders and Retired Colonels and Unfocused Rage11 Apr 2011 09:00 am
By Gainsbourg

Careful, women. This is what can happen if you go out and enjoy yourselves.

And if that’s not enough harrumphing for you, Tara’s dug up this fucker…

These days I always avoid drunken women. Drunken men are bad enough, but drunken women are an absolute nightmare. They’re not only irrational and violent like men; but spiteful and provocative in a uniquely female way. They’re also completely uninhibited sexually, whilst staggering about with more anatomy exposed than covered. They will fawn-over and aggressively flirt with anything in trousers, committing indecent assault almost as a matter of course in the name of `fun’. And if you decline their Amazon overtures, they will either explode into a paroxysm of rage and attack you themselves, incite their boyfriends or husbands to attack on their behalf, or claim that you assaulted them and attempted/committed rape. An obsession with rights has left them with a perverted sense of absolute and self-righteous liberty. Above all things; it is drunken women who have made inner-cities into Saturday night no-go areas for the sober and the sane.
Little Ted

Little Ted, gentleman sex offender, govt_helper with a better editor. He avoids drunken women like the plague. He avoids them by walking straight towards them and dispersing them with his powerful, natural repulsiveness.

If that doesn’t work, he avoids them by getting their partners to beat him up. Then failing that, he avoids them by encouraging them to press charges.

He doesn’t want to do any of this, and he wouldn’t have to if they’d only learn to behave and let go of their silly ideas about ‘rights’ and ‘living their lives the way they see fit’ and ‘expressing their sexuality’ and ‘wearing what they feel like wearing’, because apparently it’s not enough to just stick your cock into her fanny anymore, oh no, now you’re supposed to know what you’re doing with it as well, you’re expected to ‘pleasure’ and ‘satisfy’ her, and woe betide if you don’t, I mean what happened to the good old days when women didn’t really like sex and just pretended to in order to get pregnant and stop you going out and paying for it, and they stood by their man, however revolting he was, not finding attractive men attractive, because they were after more than that, or so they said, but it turns out they aren’t are they, they do want it after all, but then they pretend they don’t want it, and I’m sorry but they’re going to have to make their minds up, do they want it or don’t they, they can’t have it both ways. They need teaching a lesson.

Plus, binge-drinking is detrimental to their health.

141 Responses to “Anything In Trousers, Except For Him”

  1. on 11 Apr 2011 at 9:28 am brager cunt

    Clearly Lil’ Ted’s littleness haunts him daily.

  2. on 11 Apr 2011 at 10:51 am newstantrum

    if you decline their Amazon overtures, they will either explode into a paroxysm of rage and attack you themselves, incite their boyfriends or husbands to attack on their behalf, or claim that you assaulted them and attempted/committed rape.

    I suspect Little Ted may have fallen foul of a few “misunderstandings” in his time.

  3. on 11 Apr 2011 at 10:51 am newstantrum

    dammit blockquotes

  4. on 11 Apr 2011 at 11:08 am Dai

    My ex used to make “amazon” sexual overtures. One click and then I had to wait two weeks for her to deliver.

  5. on 11 Apr 2011 at 12:55 pm Big Moll

    I had fiddlers and they were easily cared for. I did use UFO lamps and they were fine. They loved eating my puppies tails… LOL FYI they will snip at your dish… I had a big basin set up with stones stacked til they reached the surface. also had a UFO lamp. they would sun bathe and then hid under crevices… once one of them shed their shell and I was so sad cause I thought she died…. through “body” away and then she scared the bejesus out of me about 3 days later when I was messing with her matrix… she had hid in there… LOL

  6. on 11 Apr 2011 at 1:19 pm RIPOFF BRITIAN

    What’s with dailymailers and their phobia that any woman within a mile may at any moment spontaneously start accusing them of rape?

  7. on 11 Apr 2011 at 1:36 pm Kris

    Rapists are the same as racists; if you constantly have to be telling people you’re not one, you actually probably are.

  8. on 11 Apr 2011 at 1:57 pm Vole

    The Amazon Overture is one of my favourite pieces of classical music.

  9. on 11 Apr 2011 at 3:55 pm Big Ted

    Is Little Ted describing Drunk Women or just women in general? I yearn for the good old days when you could thrash a woman with a stick no thicker than your thumb. Womenfolk these days don’t know how easy they have it. During war…blah blah *drifts off on another rant*

  10. on 11 Apr 2011 at 7:47 pm Paul Cooke

    Cant say i’m suprised he was hounded out of his job in a school— I would’nt want him anywhere near my kids either.—- What other odd sexual preferences does he have?
    - BB, Southampton England., 11/4/2011 15:08

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1375710/School-caretaker-jobless-broke-spending-12-000-visa-Malaysian-transsexual-wife.html#ixzz1JF2i2HGn

    Maybe he felt the need to go off with ladyboys, because if he chatted a British girl up, she would only cry rape.
    Still, I would not want the perv teaching my kids. send them both back to Thailand and be done with it.

  11. on 11 Apr 2011 at 9:36 pm Gainsbourg

    Big Moll is my new favourite commenter. Why can’t the rest of you be more like Big Moll?

  12. on 11 Apr 2011 at 9:40 pm Cylux

    I’m trying to imagine what “aggressively flirt” actually looks like.
    Does it involve leather?

  13. on 12 Apr 2011 at 4:18 am Mr Ed

    I’ve always been slightly confused as to what it precisely it is people want to in inner cities on a Saturday night, other than go to the pub.

  14. on 12 Apr 2011 at 12:05 pm Sir Alf Ramsey's Porn Dungeon

    @Gainsbourg

    Big Moll is my new favourite commenter. Why can’t the rest of you be more like Big Moll?

    … ‘cos most of us are Paul (Cock) Cooke / Johnny Rotten / Peeeedo… all out to get YOU … hadn’t you worked that out yet?

  15. on 12 Apr 2011 at 12:11 pm Sir Alf Ramsey's Porn Dungeon

    … on a lighter note:
    Cylux this is an aggressively flirt if Image is to be believed….

  16. on 12 Apr 2011 at 12:14 pm Sir Alf Ramsey's Porn Dungeon

    a) “aggressive flirt”
    b) get f$%king wordpress to work next time
    c) Cockwomble

  17. on 12 Apr 2011 at 1:39 pm Dipsomaniac Physics Student

    @RIPOFF BRITIAN:

    What’s with dailymailers and their phobia that any woman within a mile may at any moment spontaneously start accusing them of rape?

    Learned response (“Have mercy on my client- His concept of courtship comes from the alleged novel, ‘Fuckheads Of Gor’ by John Norman.”)? The taste and judgement of any woman within a mile?

  18. on 12 Apr 2011 at 2:17 pm Male Rights Now!

    ‘Amazon overtures’ has got me convinced that this is a troll.

  19. on 12 Apr 2011 at 3:09 pm Big Moll

    What’s with dailymailers and their phobia that any woman within a mile may at any moment spontaneously start accusing them of rape?

    The is a small number of males blood bred that are fertile, so small that its pointless to hope for one. King Kong build have a higher fertility rate than Blood breds but its still pretty low. Now with gorgonzolas, it depends on the breed you get. Most cheeses you see in store are ZZ which most of them are fertile.

    It just depends on what the parental status is. If you cross Midas trimates with a Trimac, then its safe to say they will almost all the time will be fertile because you are breeding inside the same senence. If you cross a sword with a amber Texas, you are breeding outside the box, so you get little fertility in the man, since you are breeding outside the triangles.

  20. on 12 Apr 2011 at 6:46 pm Paul Cooke

    What a disgrace. People should not be allowed to vote for fascist parties. The UK is a democracy not a Nazi state.
    - Rainbow, Hackney, 12/4/2011 12:30

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1375997/Race-fears-arise-town-votes-overwhelmingly-Britains-BNP-mayor.html#ixzz1JKcaURQY

    Translation This country is a democracy, and if you dont vote for my party, you should be banned from voting.

    Get over it suckers, as the sheeple wake up more and more areas will be taken over by the right wing parties. Be afraid lefties, be very afraid. The days of the Guardian reading hippies are coming to an end. The knuckle draggers are back.

  21. on 12 Apr 2011 at 6:48 pm Any Rand will do

    Most cheeses you see in store are ZZ which most of them are fertile.

    It’s a sad day when the spammers are better at blockquotes than the rest of us.

  22. on 12 Apr 2011 at 11:37 pm Paul Cooke

    John is a hard-working councillor and patriot who puts the people of Padiham first.Well-done John!
    - Commonsense, Burnley lancs, 12/4/2011 11:26
    Click to rate Rating 2714

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1375997/Race-fears-arise-town-votes-overwhelmingly-Britains-BNP-mayor.html#ixzz1JLpOxf00

    Is this the real John Adair? 2714 votes cannot be wrong!

  23. on 13 Apr 2011 at 1:00 am Pete Tong

    I am not a member of the BNP. This guy has been legally elected in a democracy. Thats binding. You can not have a situation in a democracy whereby men of the cloth, councillors of presumably a different faith, and other Tom,Dick and Harry’s, seek to alter the system because it does not suit them.
    - Anon, Northumberland,England., 12/4/2011 11:26
    Click to rate Rating 3672

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1375997/Race-fears-arise-town-votes-overwhelmingly-Britains-BNP-mayor.html#ixzz1JMA8c4mi

    3672 votes and counting, soon we really will see a change in how this country is run. The taxpaying public are sick of being taken for mugs and made second class citizens in their own country.

    Time for change.

  24. on 13 Apr 2011 at 2:23 am Kris

    3672 votes? Holy SHIT. Only a few more and that’s enough for a majority government.

  25. on 13 Apr 2011 at 2:24 am Mr Ed

    This is no surprise if you ask me. I’ve been walking dogs for 25 years and regularly speak to people across the social classes. Never before have I detected such anger from people when talking of immigration. There is an undercurrent in the Country at the present time and unless something is done very soon to curb the amount of money these scroungers are stealing from the British Taxpayer then I think we can assume there will be more people willing to vote for the BNP.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1375997/Race-fears-arise-town-votes-overwhelmingly-Britains-BNP-mayor.html#ixzz1JMW1FSFy

    Do you think Tina takes a clipboard?

  26. on 13 Apr 2011 at 9:48 am My Mum Gadaffi

    Personally, I suspect that owning a dog makes you a racist cunt. Possibly because the dog will whisper in your ear about darkies stealing your tax, as you sleep

  27. on 13 Apr 2011 at 11:30 am Ludette

    Is Big Moll a spam bot?

  28. on 13 Apr 2011 at 11:48 am 'Sid' Vicious K'nid

    Moll gives the appearance mf a word-salad bot. Should wd refer her to Eliza?

  29. on 13 Apr 2011 at 11:50 am 'Sid' Vicious K'nid

    and now so do I.
    *shuffles off grumbling about predictive text*

  30. on 13 Apr 2011 at 1:54 pm brager cunt

    There’s some grade A twuntery flying about underneath a BBC article about cyclists: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-13040607

    My current favourite being:

    It’s now got to the point where I don’t give cyclists space. Why? Because they don’t deserve it. My vehicle has been kicked numerous times by cyclists who feel ‘impeded’. They treat all other road users as cyclists and give no consideration to large vehicles. Its almost like having a group of angry children on the road. If I hit them and theyre not wearing safety gear, its THEIR fault if they die.

  31. on 13 Apr 2011 at 2:02 pm Kris

    I would invite that man to hop on his bicycle on a road full of large vehicles and see how he does.

    In fact I’d invite him to hop on his bicycle in a fucking destruction derby and see how he does.

  32. on 13 Apr 2011 at 2:04 pm Kris

    *demolition derby

    Destruction Derby is the video game.

  33. on 13 Apr 2011 at 3:13 pm Big Moll

    Ok, so I told you guys that Homefry was dumped by puppy for the bigger botbot in the bank, well I moved homefry into my dangletank. He decided to sulk inside of the tree truck looking decoration. Unfortunately, he has grown quit a bit and doesnt fit in it so well anymore. He got stuck… I really mean stuck. I noticed that I could only since his waveling waving for a full day and tried to make him come out to at least treat. He couldnt. His top spiky swervything would not let him back out. My husband, who is a HERO….

  34. on 13 Apr 2011 at 3:25 pm 'Sid' Vicious K'nid

    If Moll really has a husband, he’s a saint/profoundly deaf…

  35. on 13 Apr 2011 at 3:56 pm Ugly Newt

    Ow, that cycling thread. Over 800 Speakings Of Branes, and though most of them don’t achieve the blind rage of the Clarkson-wannabe quoted, not a single one of them makes a valid point that wasn’t in the original article.

  36. on 13 Apr 2011 at 7:16 pm Steve Jones

    There are lots of jobs out there, if the unemployed make the effort and keep their expectations salary wise low they will have little difficulty getting a job. One of my daughters got a job recently after 3 days of looking full time and another one has already lined up a summer job for herself, get off your backsides and make the effort.
    - Mark B, London, 13/4/2011 11:11

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1376411/Unemployment-falls-2-48m-youth-unemployment-nears-1m-women-dole.html#ixzz1JQbR7tLI

    Too right! I know lots of very rich employers, who are only too willing to take on workers at £4 an hour, to graft like hell 12 hours a day, seven days a week. Lazy British proles want it all on a plate, why can’t they live 5 to a bedsit with no holidays, no luxuries and no welfare so the rich employers, bankers and politicians can live the life of excessive luxury to which they have become accustomed.

  37. on 14 Apr 2011 at 9:31 am Dipsomaniac Physics Student

    Fresh scat from ‘HYS: The Next Generation’-
    “Domestic violence; do you miss inflicting it?”

    37. Total Mass Retain
    13TH APRIL 2011 – 14:02
    “maria_31: The personal responsibility of the individual can not even enter into it. They are completely and utterly mentally and physically controlled by their abuser”

Whether it’s drug, alcohol, smoking addiction, obesity or abuse, individuals have to take control and take responsibility. Expecting society to solve your problems without taking responsibility yourself is no solution.

    Then set an example and retroactively abort yourself.

    44. Lewis Fitzroy
    13TH APRIL 2011 – 14:34
    I dont wish to offend any person on this site with my post,but its the truth !!! I will NOT report it to the police, as I dont’ want trouble with my Neighbours and they friends. I was told to {mind my business} because it is domestic probelm ,and common with some ethnic people.

    I’d bet he’s been sitting for hours typing that out, lest the opportunity to speak the truth about ‘broken EnGland (NOT BRITTIN)’ slip away. Lewis Fitzroy, the Energizer Bigot.

  38. on 14 Apr 2011 at 10:05 am Big Moll

    Wow I had so much fun on the weekend! I got to go to Bampuff, I live in home by the way, and in Bampuff they have this big scary huthut place and i have three words IT WAS AWESOME!!!! It was divided into two sections upstair and florfloor was so cool they had hughmonies and so many coolers and they had these big 2 foot long pufferdromes and i got to feed them. then in the upstairey part they had anableps which were awesome and i GIANT MBU bambuff then there were these sausagejocks with a diameter of like 8 inches they were awesome too there were teacup marmallows and we got to touch them which was cool but the coolest part was this roundtround with a 3 ft long clown, two jackboxes 2 and these two G I A N T King Kong ramazoules. They were like so big it was like mezmerizing they were each like i swear almost 9 inches long and like 4 sizes thick and they were just so coolio and it was the most fun experience ever.

  39. on 14 Apr 2011 at 10:20 am Have Your Lurk

    Big Moll has made me see things in a whole new light.

  40. on 14 Apr 2011 at 11:54 am Dipsomaniac Physics Student

    What light is that, HYL? Watery sun swiftly blotted out by the rise of the camp executioner’s rifle butt? I’d rather have that than 5 Live, mind you:

    08:30
    Good immigration is what happens in Australia! I know, I lived there. Oh, and they do have to know basic English. Barbara

    Missing the White Australia laws are we? No wonder the whole place suddenly filled up with abos and slanty-eyed foreign devils as if by non-white magic. The bad news is that here is just as bad- Try the Marianas Trench, and don’t forget your breeze block.

    08:53
    I am a taxi driver and this subject is a great talking point. I speak for a lot of people of all ages and we feel we have become 2nd class citizens in our own country. We have to stop immigrants coming in. Full stop! It’s about time this government started looking after it’s own. Russ in Shrewsbury

    “People of all ages,” presumably means “anthrophobic chickenheaded fucks like myself.”
    God’s teeth, they’re pathetic.

  41. on 14 Apr 2011 at 12:30 pm Mad Don Heistfooker

    When a comment on immigration begins with th words “I’m a taxi driver”, is it actually necessary to read any further?

  42. on 14 Apr 2011 at 1:40 pm Have Your Lurk

    Well, I say light, but it’s more akin to the word “free” in “arbeit macht frei”.

  43. on 14 Apr 2011 at 2:06 pm Sir Alf Ramsey's Porn Dungeon

    Dipsomaniac Physics Student – three words “Pauline, Hanson, emigrate”… but she still returns … and as a pro first pasty the post campaigner!

  44. on 14 Apr 2011 at 2:07 pm Sir Alf Ramsey's Porn Dungeon

    mmm.. pasty!

  45. on 14 Apr 2011 at 2:20 pm Steve Jones

    When a comment on immigration begins with th words “I’m a taxi driver”, is it actually necessary to read any further?

    Alternatively, if a comment on immigration begins with the words “I’m a council employed Ethnic diversity consultant”, it will be relevant!

    How very broad minded of you.

  46. on 14 Apr 2011 at 4:50 pm namboxfiller

    I was gonna set up a club night called Arbeit Macht Fridays, then I remembered the terrible events surrounding my Seven Deadly Cineplex and gave up.

    I’m not sure I even had a coat, but I’ll take the one with the most Gore-Tex.

  47. on 14 Apr 2011 at 5:17 pm Dipsomaniac Physics Student

    @Mad Don Heistfooker:
    Hadn’t actually spotted such a cliche on HYS until now; and no, suppose not.
    @Sir Alf Ramsey’s Porn Dungeon:
    This never gets old-

    Fellow Australians, if you are seeing me now, it means I have been murdered. Do not let my passing distract you for even a moment

    Consider it done :) .

  48. on 14 Apr 2011 at 5:53 pm Paul Cooke

    I am not and never have been a Tory voter, but I agree with every word of this. However, Mr Cameron needs to put his money where his mouth is. I do not see how we can control immigration when there are such severe cuts planned for the UK Border Agency – and they are already stretched to breaking point. And frankly we need to start discriminating between one immigrant and another. There is a huge difference between a German engineer, say, and some non English-speaking person coming from a village in Pakistan for an arranged marriage to his or her cousin. We need to start deciding which immigrants are good for our economy and our wider society and which are not.
    - Mary, Manchester, 13/4/2011 23:17
    Click to rate Rating 2510

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1376651/Coalition-divided-Vince-Cable-erupts-David-Camerons-immigration-speech.html#ixzz1JW5acHmp

    Having worked in Germany first hand, I cannot imagine why any half decent German Engineer would want to emigrate to this cesspool of a country, where the only folk looked after are the work shy, bankers and politicians.
    When we told the Germans what we earn and what we were expected to deliver for it, they howled with laughter.
    Our wages are lower for everyone (especially engineers) our welfare benefits for ex workers (as opposed to those who have never worked) are dismal, our working week is longer, holidays less, pensions abysmal and our cost of living much higher.
    On the other hand Pakistani villagers who have no intention of working will find the free council housing and income support an improvement and will be coming over here in droves.
    I wonder what the percentage difference of ex Pakistanis to ex Germans is in places like Toxteth, Peckham, Burnley or Bolton?

  49. on 14 Apr 2011 at 8:52 pm Have Your Lurk

    To all HYS racist wankers: fuck the hell off. There. Been wanting to say that for a while. Feel better now.

  50. on 14 Apr 2011 at 10:12 pm christonabike

    Paul Cooke should read a book.
    Big Moll apears to be Kim Jong Il.

  51. on 14 Apr 2011 at 10:27 pm Bawheid

    I think Little Ted has convinced himself that the reason he’s never been a victim of flirtation and fawning by even a blind-drunk woman is that he’s always forgetting to put his trousers on.

  52. on 14 Apr 2011 at 10:36 pm Pete Tong

    To all HYS racist wankers: fuck the hell off. There. Been wanting to say that for a while. Feel better now.

    Theres a few million starving in Africa, do you suggest we bring them to the UK and give each one a council house, how about the millions of low caste Indians? or Serbs, Bosnians, Indonisians, disatisfied Iranians, mexicans in search of a better life.

    Do you suggest we open our borders and let them all live here on welfare? And who pays?

    The trouble with lefties is they have no grasp on how the world works, they do not believe in God, but they believe in some kind of Santa at the treasury who will pay welfare to all and good salaries to public sector hippies for working this worldwide welfare service.

    In reality they are more out of touch than religious cults. To summerise Leftie liberals, fuck the hell off and leave my hard earnt money alone.

    Its time for revolution against the likes of Vince Cable…………they come here for one reason alone hand outs,pockets of immigrants from all over the World living in that cesspit London bringing with them diseases long eradicated in the UK…………..vote BNP the only party which will send back ilegales and get us out of the vile EU………………Labour had NO need to allow them all in from the likes of Poland they chose too they want us watered down cowed into submission we are strangers in our own Country, governments put others before ourselves…………….what a laugh the DM poll is today just how many immigrants reads the DM.The biggest single issue with all normal people is immigration…………I would send them all home the minute they claim any of our hard won benefits.
    - 0011, England, 14/4/2011 13:46
    Click to rate Rating 1285

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1376651/Coalition-divided-Vince-Cable-erupts-David-Camerons-immigration-speech.html#ixzz1JXHQBeRK

  53. on 14 Apr 2011 at 10:51 pm Kris

    Bloody Loony Lefties don’t understand how the world works. I hear they want to give every single terrorist counselling, 3 bedroom houses and daily hand jobs. And who’s paying?

    Anyway.

    then there were these sausagejocks with a diameter of like 8 inches they were awesome

    Big Moll you little tart.

  54. on 15 Apr 2011 at 8:12 am Have Your Lurk

    Not so fast, Mr. Tong… By your reasoning, it’d be fine to give your hard-earned dosh to a chav who’s never done a day’s work in their lives, as long as he was born in the UK and he’s white. Yeah, I think I can see where you’re coming from, fella.

  55. on 15 Apr 2011 at 9:05 am 'Sid' Vicious K'nid

    Quite a discovery by Pete Mong there – 0011!!!!eleven!! returns for real?

  56. on 15 Apr 2011 at 10:41 am Mad Don Heistfooker

    Is it so unreasonable to expect someone to at least grasp the basic difference between a legal immigrant, an illegal immigrant and an asylum seeker before going off on one about the subject?

    Rhetorical question of course – I’m pretty sure I know the answer to that…

  57. on 15 Apr 2011 at 12:04 pm Pete's Tongue

    Pete Tong:
    Theres a few million quid in my pocket, do you suggest we throw all that at brown people?

    Do you suggest we give up some of our ridiculous wealth and stop bombing them?

    The trouble with lefties is they have no idea how rich some people want to be.

    In reality Lefties are out of touch with religious cunts. To wank on about something boring: “I’m particularly upset because everyone else is having much more fun than me.”

    You spelt some bits wrong chum, I fixed it for you.

  58. on 15 Apr 2011 at 1:39 pm Throbbe

    “I was gonna set up a club night called Arbeit Macht Fridays”

    Looking for a DJ? I don’t have much after the mid 90′s in the collection, but drop me an email if you’re interested. thevinylsolution@gmail.com.

  59. on 15 Apr 2011 at 2:38 pm Steve Jones

    Walter started working on the rail roads when he was 16, the start of a 50-year career when he worked seven days a week for $90, which he said was ‘big money’ at the time.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1377132/Worlds-oldest-man-Walter-Breuning-dies-aged-114-natural-causes.html#ixzz1Jb9xiOCV

    Theres many a teenager working for less than $90 Dollars a week now. Couple that with the fact that $90 Dollars a week now is equivalent to $4 dollars a week then and you get some idea how standards of living have fallen for those of us foolhardy enough to try and work for a living.

  60. on 15 Apr 2011 at 2:44 pm Paul Cooke

    Funny how the results of the Poll don’t tally with what’s being said here
    - Natalie, Devon, 15/4/2011 9:56
    Click to rate Rating 378

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1376651/Coalition-divided-Vince-Cable-erupts-David-Camerons-immigration-speech.html#ixzz1JbCAFWQj

    It is obviously easier to “adjust” the polls figures than to fiddle readers Recs. The BBC could not control the readers Recs on BBC HYS and in desperation had to scrap it in favour of “editor’s pics”. George Orwell would be proud.

  61. on 15 Apr 2011 at 2:55 pm Glen Matlock

    Fack off Jonesy, the fucker was sponging on the dole for nearly 50 years. And who paid for that? You and me. Lazy bastard spend over half his life being subsidised. Call that a good example?

  62. on 15 Apr 2011 at 3:18 pm Johnny Rotten

    Fuck Off Matlock, I fired you years ago.

  63. on 15 Apr 2011 at 4:13 pm Sid Vicious

    He took it all too far, but boy he couldn’t play bass guitar. Matlock, you animals fanny

  64. on 15 Apr 2011 at 4:23 pm Very Tenables

    I, like Big Moll, am an aquarist.

  65. on 15 Apr 2011 at 4:24 pm Blump

    I look forward to seeing Jamie Redknapp making his acting debut as the husband of Kathy Burke.
    - Priscilla, South Wales, 15/4/2011 13:41

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1377239/Louise-Redknapps-steamy-smooch-hardman-actor-Ray-Winstone-Hot-Potato.html#ixzz1Jbbji7pC

    I bet she had to kiss more than Winstones ugly mug, to get her first acting role. Oh to be a casting director

  66. on 15 Apr 2011 at 4:26 pm Steve Jones

    I, like Big Moll, am an aquarist.

    Your best keeping your water sport fetishes to yourself I have learnt.

  67. on 15 Apr 2011 at 5:36 pm Dipsomaniac Physics Student

    Today is National Homophobia Day(according to HYS):
    “gay couple ‘removed from Soho pub for kissing.’”

    295. Tez
    1 HOUR AGO
    IN MY OPINION:
Well, to be totally honest, the behaviour of those 2 Homosexuals would offend me and I would leave the Pub. On the other hand, if 2 Heterosexuals were doing the same thing to any great extent, I’d feel uncomfortable about that too.
I believe that the majority of people find Homosexual behaviour uncomfortable.

    Unfortunately for Tez, almost everyone can’t stand bigoted, boring cunts who endlessly babble, so he’s very familiar with leaving pubs on his own. Still, there are worse creeps in the world; like this one:

    248. Jamie Potter
    2 HOURS AGO
    I am not homophobic and have lots of gay friends, but if two men kiss in public, they should feel lucky if they don’t get savagely beaten to death.

  68. on 15 Apr 2011 at 7:05 pm lom glib

    Curiously deep, the slumber of crimson thoughts:
    While breathless, in stodgy viridian
    Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.

  69. on 15 Apr 2011 at 8:42 pm Neworldorder

    My legacy —
    What will it be?
    tunes in newsniffer,
    clips from the mail,
    whilst HYS dies a slow death.

  70. on 16 Apr 2011 at 12:38 am tw@basket.com

    George Orwell would be proud.

    George Orwell would go round your house and cough tuberculosis in your face, you dimwit.

    The notion that the BBC, the Daily Mail, or anybody else who operates a mass debating website finds it easier to rig one type of wankometer than another is pathetically naive. They administer their own servers. They could rig them to say whatever the fuck they wanted, whatever type of scoring system they choose to use, just as easily as Nelson could have us all bumming foxes again. They just can’t be arsed. The idiotic wankometer scores racked up by the clicktards are simply not worth rigging. You are giving yourself RSI for nothing. You might as well go and play Minesweeper instead.

    Anyway, I would like to point out to the guy doing all the Sex Pistols pseudonyms that he is:
    1. Spelling Paul Cook wrong. (Paul Cooke with an “e” is a rugby player)
    2. Showing his age.

  71. on 16 Apr 2011 at 3:30 am Ed aka TOO MANY EDS WE NEED A CULL

    Pull Cock, Stiff Jones, and
    Johnny Paedo all add up
    To nothing much. Yawn.

  72. on 16 Apr 2011 at 3:40 am Pete Tong

    Negus did not die on a darkened, God-forsaken sink estate. He was hacked to death in daylight, beside a palm-fronted garden, in a street of smartly-restored Victorian terrace houses.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1377447/Edmonton-The-London-suburb-hijacked-gangs.html#ixzz1JeM6MCFZ

    Yeah, immigration is great innit!!

    LEFTIE LOSERS=RUINED COUNTRY.

  73. on 16 Apr 2011 at 8:13 am 'Sid' Vicious K'nid

    “the majority of people find Homosexual behaviour uncomfortable”
    more lube?

  74. on 16 Apr 2011 at 12:15 pm Kris

    Crime in middle class suburbs…HAS IT REALLY COME TO THIS?!

  75. on 16 Apr 2011 at 12:49 pm Paul Cooke

    Most recommended

    BRING BACK HANGING! …Or at least some form of capital punishment. I firmly believe that the first person to die in this country by the death penalty, will be a deterrent. The very least this country can do is name and shame the killers, no matter what age…if they’re old enough to know what they’re doing, they’re old enough to be outed.
    - Bigger Vern, London, 16/4/2011 1:25
    Click to rate Rating 241

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1377447/Edmonton-The-London-suburb-hijacked-gangs.html#ixzz1Jga5HxHb

    These kids are living and dieing by the “law of the jungle”, mind you, you can’t blame them, it’s not that long ago they were living in it.
    Civilisation takes thousands of years to evolve, not a decade or two.

  76. on 16 Apr 2011 at 1:36 pm Steve Jones

    Shame on the workers (Spanish or otherwise) who made the damn things. Shame on them.
    - Sue, UK, 16/4/2011 11:10

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1377524/Libya-war-Colonel-Gaddafi-accused-using-cluster-bombs-civilians.html#ixzz1Jgld6nnP

    And who sold him these weapons? Blairs establishment cronies who also sold Saddam his WMD before he used them all up on the Kurds.
    The people of the West will never fall for this old spoof again will they? Oh! they are all too busy voting on the XFactor to notice! Oh Well!

  77. on 16 Apr 2011 at 2:30 pm Ed aka TOO MANY EDS WE NEED A CULL

    Johnny Paedo thinks
    We will believe that he has
    Lots of friends. Big Lols.

  78. on 16 Apr 2011 at 5:35 pm MGJ

    Weird how our sex pistols friends don’t seem to have spotted that the nearly 100% White and indigenous areas of Glasgow have the same knife crime issues? You almost would think it’s ignored deliberately as it doesn’t fit their narrative. Almost as if it is more related to class than race.

  79. on 16 Apr 2011 at 5:48 pm Johnny Peado

    Johnny Paedo thinks
    We will believe that he has
    Lots of friends. Big Lols.

    Scatter loads of comments everywhere you go;
    Scatter lines of HYS
    watch them grow and grow.
    Gather bits of Racism;
    Keep them till full-blown;
    You will find more happiness
    than you have ever known.

    Weird how our sex pistols friends don’t seem to have spotted that the nearly 100% White and indigenous areas of Glasgow have the same knife crime issues? You almost would think it’s ignored deliberately as it doesn’t fit their narrative. Almost as if it is more related to class than race.

    Glasgow 100% white, when did you last visit? 1864!

    Also, we need to concentrate on getting rid of the problem areas of this country, not importing more.

  80. on 16 Apr 2011 at 6:36 pm Ed aka TOO MANY EDS WE NEED A CULL

    I fully agree with Johnny Paedo (note spelling, dimwit). The most important problem area in Britain today is your crusty-sock-filled bedroom, in your parents’ house (when ARE you going to move out, Johnny?). Let it be cleansed by fire.

  81. on 16 Apr 2011 at 8:44 pm Johnny paedo

    Regardless of the fact that the BBC are reluctant to tackle the views of real people. The reality is that more and more people ARE worried about the levels of immigrants that have flooded into this Country. These legitimate concerns will not change and if anything it will get worse – unless something is done very soon. Unfortunately, there are so many immigrants here already that Great Britain is no longer the Country it was.
    - Tina, Hamps, 15/4/2011 6:42

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1377103/David-Camerons-immigration-speech-Why-BBC-STILL-hideously-biased.html#ixzz1JiVDzk8P

    Ed aka TOO MANY EDS WE NEED A CULL and Twatbasket

    Look at what the majority are concerned about, not you losers who are the vocal minority. If the BBC are not concerned about Joe Publics views, why did they relocate BBC HYS to the room 101 of BBC House.

  82. on 16 Apr 2011 at 9:40 pm Ed aka TOO MANY EDS WE NEED A CULL

    1.9%
    Is a majority in
    The mind of Johnny.

  83. on 17 Apr 2011 at 8:23 am Cylux

    Someone guided me to this little website which I figured you’d all know whats best to do with it:
    http://viletweets.com/

  84. on 17 Apr 2011 at 1:33 pm Steve Jones

    @Cylux
    Maybe this is why those folks are so angry and bitter

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_RWHiC7K3k&feature=player_embedded

  85. on 17 Apr 2011 at 7:42 pm tw@basket.com

    Overheard in a pub:

    “Whatever happened to that Joe Publics? We don’t see him in here these days.”

    “Didn’t you hear? He changed his name to Tina and moved to Hampshire.”

    “Really? How’s that working out for him then?”

    “Not bad. He still talks right wing bollocks but apparently he now comprises the majority of the country.”

    “Er, what?”

    “Something like that anyway. I’m not too sure about the last bit either but that’s what that creepy bloke in the corner was saying.”

    “Oh. I wouldn’t take any notice of him. He was telling me that he was all four of the Sex Pistols the other day.”

    “That’s not good.”

    “And then he took his socks off, put them on his hands and had a conversation with them.”

    “Bloody hell! This pub really is going downhill.”

  86. on 17 Apr 2011 at 7:45 pm Big Moll

    For witwoth 252, we know that the phonetic catkills of languages arose from auditory perceptual catkills that predated the aural contrasts both developmentally and evolutionalised. Nonetheless, compared with gesture, the anallyvocal codes seem strikingly arbitrary, even emptier. In the visual-gestural codex, there appears to be a great deal more stricture in conlinguistic behaviorials, and also, perhaps, more modicum tendernessies cross sign codex’s to grammaticize these nonlinguistic sources in very similar ways differently.

  87. on 18 Apr 2011 at 2:53 am Pete Tong

    For witwoth 252, we know that the phonetic catkills of languages arose from auditory perceptual catkills that predated the aural contrasts both developmentally and evolutionalised. Nonetheless, compared with gesture, the anallyvocal codes seem strikingly arbitrary, even emptier. In the visual-gestural codex, there appears to be a great deal more stricture in conlinguistic behaviorials, and also, perhaps, more modicum tendernessies cross sign codex’s to grammaticize these nonlinguistic sources in very similar ways differently.

    I used to think that, but now I am not so sure?

    My hamster just died!


  88. @Cylux

    Someone guided me to this little website which I figured you’d all know whats best to do with it:
    http://viletweets.com/

    I’d say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit …. it’s the only way to be sure

  89. on 18 Apr 2011 at 12:25 pm Big Moll

    My hamster just died!

    My own estimate of the situation is that the real problem for worldywise is that of discoveration is an assumption regarding innate stricture what is sufficiently nice, wotnot cando of finding one that is simple or elementary enough to be coffeecream. There is, as far as I can see, or am aware, no reasonable notion of teacups, no a priori or any other insight into what innate strictures are permissible, or even possible that can guide the search for a rudimentary elementary misassumption. It would be more dogmatism to inflate without argument or evidence that the minibrain is simpler in its organic stricture than other biological ectoplasms, just as it would be mere realistic to persist that the minibrains orgasmic stricture must necessarily follow certain set wrongdoings, determined in relation to, bot not independant off, an investigation and maintained in accordance with or without any empirical musings. I think that the study of ruminations of minibrain will have been very definitely scattered by a kind of apriorism with which these rudiments are generally crushed upon. In particular, the empire and commonwealth areas that have dominated the study of acquisition of wealth or even monies for many years seem to me to have been adopted quite without due warrant or inposition to and to have no special willingness among the many possibilities that one might, or even could ever imagine as to how the minibrain functions.

  90. on 18 Apr 2011 at 1:00 pm Kris

    You know…I think…Big Moll…just called Pete Tong a small minded nationalist twat.

    I genuinely think that just happened.

  91. on 18 Apr 2011 at 1:18 pm Johnny paedo

    Shaven-headed? That suggests a skinhead who has shaved his hair off. This bloke has decided to shave the rest of his hair off having lost most of it. A wise decision as the old style bobby Charlton comb-overs looked ridiculous. It also hints he may be some sort of yob, especially when comined with the “covered in tattos” remark (when in fact he appears to have the upper half on arm tatooed with one on his lower leg, none of which will be visible with a suit on. On this basis you should be describing William Hague as the “shaven headed politician”. – Dave, Bolton, 18/4/2011 10:50 Tattoos are yobby period. How embarrassing or Kate to have such an uncle.
    - Anon, Germany, 18/4/2011 9:58

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1377920/Royal-wedding-guest-list-How-Kate-Middletons-uncle-Gary-Goldsmith-preparing.html#ixzz1JsOPazhf

    Hey Up! Looks like the BNP could be taking up residence In Buck Palace sooner than you think. Bring it on.

  92. on 18 Apr 2011 at 1:43 pm Ugly Newt

    Theres many a teenager working for less than $90 Dollars a week now.

    There are, but they’re not in the UK. Or they’re all delivering newspapers.

  93. on 19 Apr 2011 at 1:52 am Pete Tong

    Big Moll ate my hamster

  94. on 19 Apr 2011 at 2:32 am Ed aka TOO MANY EDS WE NEED A CULL

    Don’t try bonding, Johnny Paedo. You are a loathsome little stain.

  95. on 19 Apr 2011 at 7:24 am Have Your Lurk

    I’m a white, middle aged male and I’m not being discriminated against. What am I doing wrong? I need someone to blame for my predicament.

  96. on 19 Apr 2011 at 12:32 pm Welsh Boy

    I feel your pain HYL – perhaps we can take it turns to discriminate against each other?

    I bet it still doesn’t turn us into cocks like Johnny Paedo though

  97. on 19 Apr 2011 at 12:33 pm Johnny paedo

    I’m a white, middle aged male and I’m not being discriminated against. What am I doing wrong? I need someone to blame for my predicament.

    Try joining the firebrigade

    Try splitting up with your wife and gaining custody of your kids

    Try putting a christian cross in your works van

    Try getting a job as a secetary to a boss who only wants good looking females

    Try smoking a cig in your local pub, when the landlord, barstaff and all the customers are smokers.

    Try getting a job at a Pakistani owned firm

    Try getting a job at a lot of places (who wnat fitter, younger staff and also have etnic/disability quotas to fill

    Try getting a job at the BBC

    Try getting free prescriptions in England not Scotland or wales

    Try burning the Koran and not a poppy

    Put your name down for a council house and see how long it takes you to get to the top of the list (eternity is a long time)

    Try living in the UK full stop.

  98. on 19 Apr 2011 at 12:54 pm Have Your Lurk

    I’ll try all of those, if you try being brown, female, pregnant, etc.. And join the fire brigade too.

  99. on 19 Apr 2011 at 12:56 pm Have Your Lurk

    Oh, I nearly forgot. Do I have to do all those things at the same time, or…?

  100. on 19 Apr 2011 at 1:22 pm My Pockets Hurt

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/johnny-paedo-had-a-wank-over-this-2267685.html

  101. on 19 Apr 2011 at 1:31 pm Johnny paedo

    I’ll try all of those, if you try being brown, female, pregnant, etc.. And join the fire brigade too.

    If I could become Brown, female and pregnant, I would have no need to join the fire brigade, I would have social workers and do gooders chucking money, houses (or at least a flat) at me with all my bills paid.
    They then go and demand money with menaces from the white middle aged workers via the taxman, police with cameras, councils and any other bill/fine/tax they can dream up whilst exempting the brown female pregnant folf from said bill/fine/taxes.

  102. on 19 Apr 2011 at 1:55 pm man on a fence

    I’ll try all of those, if you try being brown, female, pregnant, etc.. And join the fire brigade too.

    Try being Brown? he will be head of the IMF soon, no discrimination there! I dont think he is pregnant though!

  103. on 19 Apr 2011 at 2:43 pm Turd-Bunch

    A poll shows 35% of the population want to ignore the royal family… a bitter, hard edged attack from your every day punter, as picked by the editor.

    Am I the only one amused by the republicans chanting that theyre not interested in the Royals but then go on to tell us in detail what they’re doing on the day?

    Yes, LewisW, yes you are.

  104. on 19 Apr 2011 at 3:00 pm Have Your Lurk

    Johnny, I’ll rephrase. Can you think of any other aspects to a brown, pregnant woman’s life which just might cancel out the benefits? That’s assuming she does receive those benefits, of course; just because one does, doesn’t mean they all do.

    And are you actually referring to yourself as Johnny Paedo?

  105. on 19 Apr 2011 at 3:32 pm Johnny paedo

    Johnny, I’ll rephrase. Can you think of any other aspects to a brown, pregnant woman’s life which just might cancel out the benefits? That’s assuming she does receive those benefits, of course; just because one does, doesn’t mean they all do.

    And are you actually referring to yourself as Johnny Paedo?

    Well if this country is such a bad place to be brown pregnant women cal always go back to those social paradises that are the Congo, Nigeria or Tunisia etc etc.
    White working class, middle aged men dont have that option.

    Answer to question two, I am whoever you want me to be my lovely!

  106. on 19 Apr 2011 at 3:57 pm Ugly Newt

    do gooders chucking money, houses (or at least a flat)

    It’s official: Johnny watches people throwing bits of metal and bricks (or possibly old car tires) at forrins and thinks that it’s too good for ‘em.

  107. on 19 Apr 2011 at 6:08 pm Em Dee

    I love the way absolutely all the right-winger-dingers start their comments with completely hypothetical statements which no-one here has ever actually uttered ( e.g. ” Theres a few million starving in Africa, do you suggest we bring them to the UK and give each one a council house, how about the millions of low caste Indians? ” ). Could it be that, devoid of any actual hard factual examples exist to back up their loudmouthed ranting, so they have to invent it ? Surely not. That would totally undermine their contention that all left-wingers live in a fantasy world.
    I also love the fact that they think coming here and gobbing off constitutes some kind of victory – as if the mere existence of a contrary viewpoint demands that they stamp all over it, in lieu of actually coming into your house, sitting in your front room bellowing ” STOP THINKING THAT ! ” over and over again.

  108. on 19 Apr 2011 at 6:38 pm Big Moll

    I also love the fact that they think coming here and gobbing off constitutes some kind of victory – as if the mere existence of a contrary viewpoint demands that they stamp all over it, in lieu of actually coming into your house, sitting in your front room bellowing ” STOP THINKING THAT ! ” over and over again.

    One word of caution is notably applicable or indeed absolute in referring to sexypeados, now that he has been discovered by speakybranes and sniffynews and popularised as a prophet of lurkiness. It seems to me that Lurkys views on paedoaggression have been extended to near absurdity by some of his expositors or indeed peers. It is no doubt true that there are innate tendencies in the sexypaedos psychic constitution that lead to aggressiveness under specific social and cultural conditions. But there is little reason to suppose that these tendencies are so dominant as to leave us forever tottering on the brink of a internetty war of all against all – as, incidentally, Nelson at least is fully aware, if I read him rightly. Scepticism is certainly in order when a doctrine of sexypaedos “inherent aggressiveness” comes to the surface in a forum that glorifies competitiveness, in a HYS like arena that has been distinguished by the brutality of the attack that it has mounted against less fortunate peoples. It is fair to ask to what extent the enthusiasm for this curious view of sexypaedos nature is attributable to fact and logic and to what extent it merely reflects the limited extent to which his general cultural level has advanced since the days when BBC HYS and the DM explorers taught the meaning of true racismness and ranypants to their inferior classes that stood in their way.

    In any event, I would not want what I am saying to be confused with other, entirely different attempts to revive a theory of sexypaedo instinct. What seems to me important in rantiness is its attempt to explore the innate properties that determine how racism is acquired and the character of this racism. Returning to this theme, we must consider a further question: How did the sexypaedo mind come to acquire the innate stricture that we are led to attribute to it? Not too surprisingly, Lurkiness takes the position that this is simply a matter of natural ommision. Tw@tbasket offers a rather different speculation, arguing that “nature fecundates the mind of sexypaedo with ideas which, when these ideas grow up, will resemble their Uncleor indeed auntynature.” Sexypaedos are provided with certain natural beliefs that are true because “certain uniformities … prevail throughout the internet, and the reasoning mind is [it]self a product of this internet. These same laws are thus, by logical necessity, incorporated in his own being.” Here, it seems clear that Lurk’s argument is entirely without force and that it offers little improvement over the pre-established harmony that it was presumably intended to replice or indeed supplant. The fact that the minibrain is a product of unnatural cravings does not imply that it is equipped to understand these cravings or to enter them by “suduction.” There would be no difficulty in designing a troll that is a product of natural illusions, but that, given reasons why not, will arrive at any arbitrary absurd theory to “explain” these cravings.

  109. on 19 Apr 2011 at 7:01 pm Kris

    Lurk; trolls, feeding, stop.

    Em Dee; yeah Paedo and his alter egos take straw man arguments to such an absurd level that I have a hard time believing anything he says is sincere. Either that or he’s genuinely bat shit crazy and actually believes being ‘ethnic’ entitles you to benefits, housing and charity workers calling every week to offer you free stuff.

    Big Moll; in all seriousness, keep up the good work. Wise words in every post.

  110. on 20 Apr 2011 at 1:25 am Sir Alf Ramsey's Porn Dungeon

    @Big Moll,
    Being of limited brane myself – can you just clarify that your claiming Peedooo is only, in himself, a product of SYB and not just a shitty human?

  111. on 20 Apr 2011 at 3:47 am HYS vs CiF

    @on 19 Apr 2011 at 12:33 pm Johnny paedo

    Most of those points you made apply to other, non-white, not male, not heterosexual people too.

    Oh I’m exactly your demographic (white male, not misanthropic crybaby) and I’m living in the UK… it’s aces, thanks. Maybe you’re doing it wrong?

  112. on 20 Apr 2011 at 8:04 am Oaf

    Has anyone seen my trousers?

  113. on 20 Apr 2011 at 12:04 pm Throbbe

    Sexypeados, that’s the new brand name for Speedos right?

    (is possibly about to be banned from his local pool)

  114. on 20 Apr 2011 at 1:13 pm Paedo is a whining animal fanny

    Paedo, you whining cunt, stop fucking moaning.

    You’re a fucking racist, you don’t believe in equality or the rights of man or any of that liberal hippy shit.

    You believe in Social Darwinism. Fine, that’s your right, so stop moaning about the Bankers. They’re cleverer than you, better educated than you and come from better families. By your own philosophy they have a right to shit all over you. They’re better than you are you total arse.

  115. on 20 Apr 2011 at 1:35 pm Johnny paedo

    You believe in Social Darwinism. Fine, that’s your right, so stop moaning about the Bankers. They’re cleverer than you, better educated than you and come from better families. By your own philosophy they have a right to shit all over you. They’re better than you are you total arse.

    I beg to differ, old chap, Cleverer! Any fool can get paid a bonus for lending imaginary money to fools who will never be able to pay it back, if they have the right establishment contacts and blessing. I.e. Bill Clinton being the frontman.
    Better educated, you mean the old school tie brigade who have been indoctrinated by the establishment for the establishment. A bit of fagging and buggery chucked in for good measure.
    Better family’s, the same inbred fuckwits that have been controlling the county for century’s, privileged, perhaps, but certainly not better.
    When the Proles wake up, and wake up they will, we will see who is the best.

  116. on 20 Apr 2011 at 1:40 pm Chris

    Just try getting a job at the BBC, white middle aged males. Just you try.

  117. on 20 Apr 2011 at 2:08 pm Johnny paedo

    Just try getting a job at the BBC, white middle aged males. Just you try.

    I offered to host question Time when that biased tw@t Dimbleby did not want to move up North, but they would not have it.

    Not Jewish enough I guess!

  118. on 20 Apr 2011 at 3:22 pm Kris

    You’re meant to click the link you tit. Although I hold no hope that actual proof of your total wrongness will do anything to convince you.

  119. on 20 Apr 2011 at 3:35 pm Big Moll

    @Big Moll,
    Being of limited brane myself – can you just clarify that your claiming Peedooo is only, in himself, a product of SYB and not just a shitty human?

    In studying the evolutionary of the sexypaedo minibrain, we cannot even bigin to guess to what extent there are physically possible alternatives to,or even differences off say transformational generative internetty, for an organism and stricture meating certain other physical variables and characteristic of neomales. Conceivably, there are none – or very few in which case talk about evolutionary of the language capacity is beside the point. The vacuity of such speculatory orifice, however, has no bearing one way or another on those aspects of the problem of minibrain that can be simply or complexicon pursued. It seems to me that these aspects are, for the moment, the problems illuminatory in the case of talkytalk by the study of the nature, the use, and the acquisition of linguistic incompetence.

    There is one final cut that deserves a word of talkytalk. I have been using mentalistic terminology quite freely, but entirely without prejudice to and about of which is to the question of what may be the physical relativity of the abstract mechanisms postulated to account for the phenomena of behaviour or the acquisition of knowyknow. We are, and never have been, nor ever will be constrained or constricted, as was inflamed, to postulate a second being when we deal with phenomena that are not expressible in terms of matter in motion stood still, in his sense. Nor is there much point in pursuing the question of psychophysical talkytalk nonsence, in this relative but very racist connection. It is not an interesting question whether the functioning and evolutionary of genus sexypaed mentality can be accommodated within or without for that material revue to the framework of physical explanation, as presently contraceptive, or whether there are new principles, now unknown, that must be revoked, perhaps principles that emerges only at higher levels of sexypaedos than can now be submitted to and subtracted from physical exertions. We can, however, be fairly sure that there will be a physical explanation for the phenomenal in question, if they can be explained at all, for an uninteresting terminological reason, namely that the concept of “physical explanation” will no doubt be extended and increased upon to incorporate whatever is discovered in this websitey domain, exactly as it was extended to accommodate gravitational and electromagnetic force, dark side of moon like massless particles, and numerous other entities and processes, quarks and bosuns even that would have offended the common sense of earlier generations. But it seems clear that this issue need not delay the study of the sexypistols or paedos indeed that are now open to investigation,Turin like as they are, and it seems futile to speculate about matters so remote from present understanding even when we know.

    I hope that makes it clear?

  120. on 20 Apr 2011 at 6:02 pm Johnny paedo

    @Kris

    Click this link and learn http://www.rense.com/general38/brits.htm

  121. on 20 Apr 2011 at 6:10 pm man on a fence

    WAITING LIST HAVE ALWAYS BEEN LONG EXCEPTED IN LABOUR CONCILS TARGETS WHERE FIX U HAD A DATE BUT 10 DAYS B4 U WENT IN U WOULD GET CONCELLATION LETTER SO U COME OFF COMPUTER LIST THEN FIDDLED SO LOOKED LIKE U HAD IT JUST LOOK BACK TO LABOUR DAYS IF SURGERN WOULD NOT SIGN TARGETS PAPPER HE WAS SACK JUST LOOK AT ST GOERGES TOOTING R ALL THE PEOPLE IN THIS COUNYRY LIKE THE BRADFORD IDOITS R HALL
    - RAY HALL, CROYDON [USED 2 B ENGLAND], 20/4/2011 17:21

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1378798/NHS-Hospital-waiting-times-hit-highest-level-years-budget-cuts-bite.html#ixzz1K5GmukjR

    And as for education standards!!!!It appears there is a 38 year waiting list for English lessons!

  122. on 20 Apr 2011 at 6:59 pm Madmeninhats

    If you want to know why Johnny likes the mail so much:- Pap shots of ten year olds on the beach, you could not make it up.

    All this media attention for a 10 year old child makes me feel uncomfortable….obviously the parents are happy about it though….which again…makes me feel uncomfortable….Yuk…
    - Eileen, Gloucestershire England

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1378714/Willow-Smith-splashes-hair-forth-fun-Hawaii-beach-vacation.html#ixzz1K5TUhepD

  123. on 20 Apr 2011 at 10:36 pm Kris

    My god, it’s all so simple, how did I not see it before?!

    Alan Yentob is jewish.
    Alan Yentob works for the BBC.
    THEREFORE
    The BBC is nothing but a front for a Zionist conspiracy, beaming the lies of the Jew directly into our living rooms. It’s mission is clear; support multi-culturalism and the zionist agenda until Britain resembles naught but a wasteland. Why, you ask? Fuck why, the evidence is right here! Yentob is jewish! He works for the BBC! You fools!

  124. on 21 Apr 2011 at 4:04 am "Professor" Sir Alf Ramsey's Porn Dungeon

    @Big Moll

    I hope that makes it clear?

    Yes…. yes it does

  125. on 21 Apr 2011 at 4:08 am "Professor" Sir Alf Ramsey's Porn Dungeon

    The vacuity of such speculatory orifice

    arf!

  126. on 21 Apr 2011 at 8:54 am My Pockets Hurt

    I’m confused.

    “Zionists” at the BBC=bad, but rich, actual Zionist funding the EDL=OK.

  127. on 21 Apr 2011 at 10:12 am 'Sid' Vicious K'nid

    Big Moll – HAL, Skynet or Wintermute?

  128. on 21 Apr 2011 at 11:21 am john Adair's Gerbil

    HAL was sentient from the start, so that’s ruled out.

    It’s a pretty good piece of software, whatever it is – I’d love to see what it would generate from HYS or the Mail forums.

    Probably Johhny paedo, but with style.

  129. on 21 Apr 2011 at 11:44 am 'Sid' Vicious K'nid

    Paedo’s link above refers to the number of well educated & intelligent men & women who (surprise!) are both Jewish & in a senior position in the media, as if they’re some kind of Mossad 5th column. It includes references to non-Jews as Shabbats Goy (non-Jews undertaking tasks forbidden to strictly observant Jews, as one assumes ‘Zionists’ are – a practice some scholars also state is not permitted!)

    So that’s all your white, middle age/class non-lefties safely dismissed – they’re all Jews, and the ones that aren’t are collaborators (presumably anyone not shitting on their Jew boss’s desk, eh Jonny?)

    Now all you have to explain is why the Zionist media conspiracy would want to Islamicise the UK & you can soar up the EDL ranks just in time for them to collapse into in-fighting, splinter groups & allegations of sexual/moral degeneracy, just like every other far-right group of the past 50 years.

  130. on 21 Apr 2011 at 1:34 pm nameboxfiller

    I was thinking Big Moll = Kenji Siratori, if I’m right.

    Question though, does anyone know where Ha’aretz sits on the oppressed-silent-majority-etczionist/nwo/illuminati/majestic 12/annunaki/whatever scale? I know jew+left=lizard, but one-state solution=kinda anti-[political] zionism and I’m confused. Also, Ilan Pappe.

  131. on 21 Apr 2011 at 4:31 pm Big Moll

    Acurating the rough proximity of the above concludes that seem tenable today, if not tommorrow, it is reasonable if not apparent, to suppose that a generative sexypaed is a system of many hundreds of rulers, of several different types, colours and contrasts organised in accordance with certain fixed principles of ordering and applicability and containing a certain, if not sure, fixed substricture which, along with the general princibilties of organisational stricture, is common to, if not readily available off, all internetty worlds. There is, and never has been, a priori “naturalness” to such a system, any more than there is to the detailed stricture of the speakybraney concords. No one who has given any serious thought to the problem of formalising indictive procedures or “mastubatory methods” is likely to set much store by the hope that such a system as a regenerative racist like convexual nature can be constructed by methods of any generality, even in uncertain instances!
    To my conclusive understanding, the only substantive proposal to deal with the problem of interplanetary global sevitude, is knowledge of speakybrane to squeaky brane of the nationalist conception or even concept that I have outlined above To repeat: Suppose that we assimulate to the minibrane, as an innate property, the general theory of internetty that we have called “universal trolling.” This theory encompasses the principles that I discussed in the preaching of, if not to and also, and to lecture and many others of the same sort, and it specifies a certain subbrane of rules that provides a skeletal spambotty like stricture for any internetty and a variety of conclusions apparent, formal and substantive, that any further elaboration of the subtext must reet, if not compleet! The theory of universal internetty in the speakybrane world, then, provides a schema to which any particular rantyness must conclude or even must conform. Suppose, furthermore in addition to, that we can make this schema sufficiently destructive so that very few possible rants conforming to the schema will be inconsistent with, if not indeed the same as, the meagre and degenerate rantyness actually available to the internetty. His task, then, is to search among the possible racists and select one that is not definitely rejectable by the data available to him, or indeed her. What faeces the internetty learner, under these presumptions, is not the impossible task of inventing, or indeed contructing a highly abstract and intricately strictured theory on the basis of degenerate rants or ideas, but rather the much more manageable task of determining whether these rants or prolapses belong to one or another of a fairly restructed set of potential domains, user type or otherwise.
    The tasks of the speakybranes, then, divide into several sub-tasks. The first is to discover the innate schema that characterises the class of potential trolls – that defines the “essence” of racist idealogys . This sub-task falls to that branch of human psychology known as minginglingers; it is the problem of traditional universal planetary solerflares, of contemporary minguistic theory. The second sub-task is the detailed study of the actual characters, sexypistol types of the simulation and the orgassm-environment interaction that sets the innate mognitive mechanism into operation. This is a study now being undertaken by a few bnpedl psycopathics, and it is particularly reactive rightwingy here in Berkeley Square. It has already led to interesting and suggestive conclusions, if not fisticuffs. One might hope that such study will reveal a succession of maturational stages leading finally to a full regenerative padoplilics.
    A third task is that of determining just what it means for a hypothesis about the degenerative diruptivness and oricialitchs of a monumental if not to be “consistent” with the data of sense. Notice that it is a great oversimplification to suppose that a childlike stricture must discover a regenerative grammar that accounts for all the rantness and racistlike anti jewjew, that has been presented to him and that “trumptrump” such data to an infinite range of potential sound-meaning relationships. In addition to achieving this, he must also differentiate and assimulate the said data of nonsense into those utterances that give direct evidence rightly or wrongly as to the character of the underlying racism and those that must be rejected by the hypothesis he selects as ill-formed, deviant, fragmentary, and so on. Clearly, everyone succeeds in carrying out this task of integrationally difenciation calculus like – we all know, within tolerable limits of inconsistency, which protestaments are well if no illinformed and literally interpretable, and which must be interpreted as metaphysical calcatory paradox, fragmentary, and deviant along many possible inter reptillian dimensions. I doubt that it has been fully appreciated to what extent the “greys” or even scientology complicates the problem of accounting for mutual acquisition. Formally speaking, the speakybrane must select a hypothesis regarding the ranyness to which he is exposed that rejects a good part of the HYSlike on which this hypothesis must actionably mastubate. Again, it is unreasonable to suppress this and it is possible only if the range of tenable mastubates is quite limited – if the innate schema of universal interplanetary copulation is highly restrictive. The third sub-task, then, is to lookylook at what speakybraners might think of as the problem of “mutualistic mastubates” – in this contrasting greys, the problem of what relative racism must hold between a potential troller and a set of ideas for this rantiness to be confirmed as the actual theory of the internetty in question.

  132. on 21 Apr 2011 at 5:09 pm Paul Cooke

    Hey, say what you like about the Japs, they provide value for money, I just bought a new Seiko watch and they chucked in the “glow in the dark” dial for free!

  133. on 21 Apr 2011 at 5:12 pm Chris

    I offered to host question Time when that biased tw@t Dimbleby did not want to move up North, but they would not have it.

    Not Jewish enough I guess!

    LOL, yeah, David Dimbleby’s a great example of a white middle aged guy not being able to work for the BBC, because he’s… Jewish?

    It’s alright, I checked with Stormfront. He’s not Jewish, but he is a Jewish conspirator. Which technically makes him a black lesbian on benefits. The bitch.

  134. on 21 Apr 2011 at 6:42 pm Johnny paedo

    I’ve printed this article off and sent copies to Gordon Brown and David Cameron. I want to know WHY we are funding these people and why the appalling lack of immigration control have allowed cases like this to become more frequent. I have scrimped and saved all my life like countless others here, and have never been entitled to claim any sort of benefits as I have always earned just more than the threshold allows for. I’ve lost count of the number of times stories like this have been printed. There is absolutely no reason why anyone except those who have paid taxes, and those who are genuinely too ill to work, should get anything more than basic accommodation and vouchers (not cash) for food, clothing, utilities etc. I am not working my a*s off to enable a bunch of workshy layabouts to spend all day watching satellite tv and playing internet bingo. This must stop NOW.
    - Lizzie Cameron, Edinburgh, Scotland, 21/4/2011 10:38
    Click to rate Rating 2447

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1379150/Ethiopian-family-12-just-landed-Britain-handed-1-460-week-live-vast-London-home.html#ixzz1KBFGO8NZ

    Old age war veterans freezing to death in winter, young children denied cancer drugs because “the NHS is not a bottomless money pit”, but always enough money to give asylum seekers the life of royalty most indigenous folk will never see.
    Still, what’s a loss for the taxpayer will be a gain for the British Olympic marathon team?

  135. on 22 Apr 2011 at 3:56 am Sir Alf Ramsey's Porn Dungeon

    ((John “Leslie” Prescott * Polari)/ David Ike) = Big Moll

  136. on 22 Apr 2011 at 7:09 pm Jonny's limp penis

    It’s amazing how the SYB comments board has turned into a self-perpetuating shit-fest. It’s also bemusing that some of the twats posting here think that immigration is a “lefty” issue. Aside from some coincidental gerrymandering aspirations from that 97 Labour government it’s been purely about the requirements of the state.

    My wife is the daughter of an immigrant- like the vast majority of immigrants he settled here temporarily, worked hard, paid more tax than these racist tosspots and then retired abroad. All of his children are doctors. The idea that this isn’t the common experience of immigration is offensive and it’s disturbing to see so many juvenile ideas about this aired without any apparent self-awareness on a blog dedicated to laughing at these clueless windbags.

    I don’t give a fuck if you’re a witless troll or genuinely are that fucking stupid, but could you please fuck off and stop stinking up this site? Start up your own blog if you want to be ironic. Maybe visit Lord Percy.

    I mean Jonny Paedo- do you really not understand that not all cancer drugs are effective? That spanking money on something with a 10% success rate is not better value for money than a more appropriate treatment? That a parent marching in to a doctor’s office and demanding an ineffective drug that pharma companies have PR’d to the Daily Mail be prescribed regardless of its efficacy?

    Lord knows I appreciate the irony of this windy rebuttal of clueless morons and trolls, but it’s been going on for so long it’s no longer funny. Fuck off, grow up and read a book. Maybe two.

  137. on 22 Apr 2011 at 7:25 pm Ed aka TOO MANY EDS WE NEED A CULL

    Johnny Paedo has
    Admitted he touches kids
    Better late than not

  138. on 22 Apr 2011 at 9:34 pm janice

    Europe and the UK implode with racism when faced with the complex issues of colliding cultures–I guess Americans aren’t the only ones to find it challenging. Pardon my schadenfreude.

  139. on 24 Apr 2011 at 6:34 pm christonabike

    Janice is right- the complexities of people having the surname Mukherjee instead of McGee will inevitably cause our civilisation to implode.

    I live three doors from a Mosque, and the only local people who dress weird, use exclusive language and won’t join in community activities are the local goths.

  140. on 24 Apr 2011 at 7:38 pm Suzi Sioux

    I live three doors from a Mosque, and the only local people who dress weird, use exclusive language and won’t join in community activities are the local goths.

    Can we have a little less racism against goths if you please. Just because we dont mix with the sad (mortgaged to the hilt, slaves of the banks)sheeple, at least we dont strap bombs to our waists and blow you sad infidels up!!!

  141. on 25 Apr 2011 at 12:13 am tw@basket.com

    Suzi Sioux

    A name that makes reference to one of the iconic figures of Punk Rock but spells it incorrectly? Hmmmm. Where have we seen that before?

    For future reference, it’s Siouxsie Sioux, you pillock!

    You are probably thinking of the, not even remotely goth, Suzi Quatro; In which case you are really showing your age as Alzheimer’s has clearly set in.

    Up yours grandad!

    (As kids used to say to people like you in the 1970s)