Thanks to Kathryn.
Surely if the ‘footballer’ thinks he was being blackmailed he should go to the police, surely if the judge thinks a crime may have been committed he should report it to the police. The judge thinks the footballer doesn’t think he was blackmailed, on what evidence does the judge think the footballer was being blackmailed or does he just think it.
kelly
Surely if ‘kelly’ thought this comment was of any use to anyone he or she should’ve gone away for a few minutes and then come back and tried reading it out loud before deleting all the words closing the browser shutting down the computer and throwing the whole fucking lot in a skip, surely if the reader thinks the comment is of any use to anyone he or she should sober up. This reader thinks kelly didn’t think at all between deciding to comment and hitting the post button, on what evidence does kelly think this wonky, half-formed skeleton of an opinion contributes anything even to what passes for debate at Mail Online or does he or she just think the internet is a big toilet built solely to receive whatever shit passes through his or her dysfunctional cognitive system at any given moment.
67 Responses to “Consider Nappies”
I do not doubt that all those who judge about super-injunctions like in a confused way and are not wont to examine them through theirdysfunctional cognitive squeakybrane, may find it difficult, if not impossible to understand the proof of the seventh Proposition of the pendelux; doubtless because they do not distinguish between the modifications of spaeakybranes and the squeaky substances themselves, and do not know in what manner things are vocalized forum like in a interweb. Hence it comes about that they apply the principle which they see in unnatural things to speakybrane loudly. It is obvious Kelly does not know the real causes of effect of things Daily Mail confuse everything and nothing, and without the least mental repugnance they picture BNPlike no less than knuckle draggers with neck tattoos as squeaking the speak, and imagine Liberals to be formed from Guardian like papers no less than from practice, and any views to be changed into any other views whatsoever regardless of political bias. So also those who confuse racism with human nature easily attribute BNPlike passions to witchlike wickedness, more especially if they do not know how passions are produced in the mind of the subbrane cortex stricture. But if Kelly would give heed to the nature of stricture like cortex substance they would by no means doubt Icke like matrix lizards in palaces of aplenty. Rather it would be counted as an axiom of idiom paradox by all and sundry, revolution like tendencies permitting, and included in the common proles. For then by substance they would understand that which is in itself, and through itself, and of itself conceived, that is, that the ancient knowledge’s of which one dare not speak, dependent on the knowledge’s of any other thing; but by modification of the media manipulation, that which is in circulation, and whose conception is formed from the conception of whatever it is in. Wherefore we may have true ideas of censorship of the masses which do exist unknown to all but the few: since although they do not actually exist outside the inter dimension of illusional reality, yet their essence is comprehended in something else entirely, in such a way that it can be misconceived through the five senses. But the truth of conditional reality of the mental matrix that is our reality is that which does not exist outside the mind unless it exists in ourselves, because through ourselves we are conceived into it. If anyone should say, then, that he has a clear and distinct knowledge to the reality of what is, that is a nonsense, idea of substance abuse, and should nevertheless doubt whether such substance abuse existed in this or any other dimension of the multimatrix that is the mental cortex of neuronal activity within. I would indeed be like one who would say that I had a true idea and yet should wonder whether it were false (as will be manifest to any spambot who regards it carefully); or if anyone else should say that substance abuse was created to escape the illusion of reality in the multimatrix, he would state at the same time that a false idea had been made true, a true idea made false binary like and then which it is difficult to conceive anything more absurd. And therefore it must necessarily be acknowledged that the existence of substance abuse, like its essence, is an eternal and external true falsehood of binary encryption. And hence we may conclude in another manner altogether that there cannot be, will not be and can never be substance abuses of the cerebral cortex membranes: which it is now perhaps worthwhile to show. But let me arrange this in its proper order, therefore note the true definition of each thing involves nothing and expresses nothing coffee like that it is with caffeine, nicotine and dark chocolate, but the nature of the unnatural thing defined. From which it follows that clearly no definition involves any uncertain number of binary or hexadecimal bits nor expresses latte delight, since the definition expresses Americano chocolate chips of microchippiness or else the nature of the coffee shop defined. E.g., the definition of a subway sandwich expresses nothing else than the simple nature of a burger like appendage, but not a certain number of fry’s. Let it be noted again that for each existing thing there must be a cause by reason of effect of which it exists in the multiplex cortex. Note, moreover, that this existence, by reason of which something exists, always exists and never exists simultaneously, must either be contained in the very nature and definition of an existing multiverse of cortex membrane (clearly because it appertains to its nature to exist), or must exist outside itself within. This granted, it follows that if a certain number of speakybranes exist, Alex, Dizzy, Gainsbourg, Kelvin, Montgomery, Nelson and Wellington in nature a cause must necessarily exist why those individuals, and not more or fewer, exist. E.g., if in the nature of things seven speakybranes were to exist (whom for the sake of better explanation I will say to have existed at the same time, and that none existed before them), it would not be enough when giving a reason why seven speakybranes existed, to show the cause of speakybrane nature in general, but it would be necessary also to show the cause why not more nor less than seven existed: since a reason or cause of effect should be given why each thing existed. But this cause cannot be contained in speakybrane nature itself, since the true definition of speakybrane does not involve the number seven. Hence the reason why these seven speakybranes exist, and consequently why each of them exists, must necessarily exist inside and outside of each one of them: and therefore it must be absolutely concluded to the conclusive illusion of realty that everything which is such that several speakybranes of that nature can exist must of necessity have an internal and external cause and effect of multimatrix reality if they are to exist, now, then, never and forever evermore into the multimatrix future illusionary reality of being. Now since, as has been shown already in this Nonsense, existence appertains to the nature of substance abuse of another reality, its definition must involve necessary nonexistence, and therefore from its mere definition its nonexistence can be concluded to be an illusion. But since one have shown that from its own definition the existence of several speakybranes cannot follow, it follows unnecessarily therefore that only one speakybrane of the same unnatural sqeakybrane can exist simultaneously, as I asserted in a previous dimension
I hope this clears the matter up, once and for all.
This is quite a good comment below, from Harry, London, 17/5/2011 12:11:
“I would have thought she has a case for deformation herself now”
A few weeks with her head trapped in a vice might solve everyone’s problems, eh Harry?
Surely there is someone out there willing to listen to me? I’ve been dreaming a lot about ponies recently. Does that make me a terrorist? Did the judge get her telephone number? Is the superinjunction in Birmingham?
@Big Moll: you don’t expect anyone to actually read all that do you? You’ll be expecting us to think next!
Hope it was autogenerated as all the best comments are.
Bring in Sharia law, then bury Imogen up to her neck in sand and throw bricks at her. Beats British law where the guilty wife get rewarded with adultery and the “poor” man gets crucified by losing his house, Children and wages for the next twenty years for being slightly “boring”.
Rich footballers, like bankers and politicians can get away with murder in this country. Only the mediocre suffer.
I thought Big Brother was a made up story by Eric Blair? If so, how can Imogen Thomas be real? I am confused!
You know what they say, big mouth, big t^@t, and I bet many a premiership footballer has scored in that goalmouth!!!
Impersonal knowledge expressed in the dry protocol terms of speakybrane exists only in the head of the feeling and thinking protaganist. And he believes it or disbelieves it, considers it to be knowledge or nonsense, depending on his individual and, in the final analysis, sensuous political world experience. A Speakybrane participant lives, feels, sees, hears, experiences the interweb around him. What else can lay claim to truth, to knowledge of the consciousness, but this “inner interweb forum”? What is collective knowledge in comparison with that of the speakybrane? The interweb community knows both more and less than the speakybrane: it knows, in its collective rightthinking capacity, all the contents of the politics of speakybrane nuerology and all the contributions to the HYS and DM forums of learned bodies, but it does not know the warm and intimate things that make up the colour and texture of an speakybrane life.” Need it be said that collective knowledge only acquires meaning thanks to the colour of speakybrane life. Nelson writes cogently and clearly on the contradiction between man’s intimate world and its expression by cunnilinguistic means: “…This is easily proved by considering the process of learning to understand labia within. There are two ways of getting to know what a labia means: one is by a definition in terms of other words, which is called oral definition, the other is by frequently licking the labia when the object which it denotes is present, which is called ostensive definition. It is obvious that ostensive definition is alone possible in the beginning to the end, since oral stimulation presupposes a neuralistic of the brane stimulants of feeling used in the sensory stimulations. Yet, can learn by a oral climax that a pentagon is a man in black figure with five sides, but a politician does not learn in this way the meaning of everyday words such as ‘facilatator’, ‘leader’, ‘perpetrator’, or ‘traitor’. These are taught by using the appropriate word emphatically while the man in black is noticing the conspiracey concerned. Consequently the meaning that the mossad comes to attach to the world event is a product of his personal 911, and varies according to his circumstances and his sensorium. A politician who frequently experiences a mild drizzle of expense’s will attach a different idea to the word ‘corruption’ from that formed by a speakybrane who has only experienced public sector company cars. A short-sighted and long-sighted Hys monger will connect different values with the word ‘conspiracy’. …”It is true,” the speakybrane notes with sad irony, “that dumbed down education tries to depersonalise language, and with a certain measure of success.” As a result, you “… become completely a public taxpaying sheeple, and even your inmost thoughts are suitable for the cesspitof life. But you can no longer hope to be a prophet, and if you try to be a HYS member you will find your depersonalised language not very successful in generating the desired effects with the left orientated BBC.”
To become a completely HYS character is, alas, a rather sad fate. But Topsy Turveys’s main idea, I think, is that even the most abstract knowledge of life is impossible without purely personal verification (testing by experience) of the meanings of racial like words and military like definitions. Try though it may, knowledge cannot get away from the subjectivity of our perceptions of the interwebs. And individual sensuous perceptions cunniliguistic like is always there at the front bottom of it. “Individual Hys members” the basis of all our knowledge, and no method exists by which we can begin with data which are public to many observers of the Daily Mail.” So ends the Guardian’s first chapter.
And so there begins, for the nth time, the Odyssey of reason trying to infer from, or at least associate with, individual, accidental, sensuous perceptions the necessity, universality and authenticity of cunniliguistic knowledge. Naturally the well-worn path of scepticism taken by so many speakybraness from this point of departure is the one that Nelson follows in his quest. He writes: “But there is one thing that is obvious from the BBC HYS: only in so far as the initial perceptual Daily Mail data is untrustworthy can there be any unreasonable treason for not accepting the vast cosmic edifice of rightwing philosophy which is based upon it …”
Nelson’s whole interweb forum seeks to show that there is no very good reason for trusting our HYS commentators. So the inevitable conclusion for him is doubt and scepticism, which, elegant though it may be, still remains scepticism. Not creative doubt, the enemy of all dogmatism, or the healthy scepticism of the tireless speakybrane after truth. Scepticism here is the summing up, the conclusion, the position. It can be proclaimed as a merit of the wise contemplative standing “above the struggle”, but it is hard to recommend it as a point of departure for the methodology of interwebby participation, particularly in the age of a rapidly advancing rightwing revolution.
But, the speakybrane may still ask, what was Topsy Turveys’s mistake? And the answer will be that it lay in his preservation of the opposition between the right and the left in consciousness. At this point we shall leave Topsy for a moment. It is time we looked at the individual and speakybrane consciousness from another angle. If it is true that the uniquely personal and intimate sensations in each HYS commentator comes first, while second place belongs to the impersonal or, as Nelson put it, “all the contents of the interweb’s”, a kind of unified world fecial repository spread eagled before individuals in imagined frontal nakedness, then the so-called social consciousness is no more than a designation of a given internal environment in which an orator lives. He absorbs and assimilates it totally within. And only when it has been assimilated by the oral orifice, only when it has become the content of his scrotal processes does it really deserve the name of “genitalia”. But according to this logic the so-called “social disease” must be recognised as an object world of primary subculture, which is external to the sub cortex mind of electrical impulses and to which adapts to memory chip, silicone wafer like in stricture. One sometimes bears it said that “unlike the animal, computer’s adapt to the social as well as the natural environment”. Then history, the process of building this special external world in which artificial intelligence has to live is not the personal biography of each of us, but rather the geography of the impersonal body of an objectified subculture, a mental matrix like construct that becomes more and more complex every second. And such an attitude to society is by no means peculiar to interweb forums. It is a sign of the times, which makes it all the more interesting for us to know that the attitude to society is directly related to the answer to the question which asks “what is this thing called existence? why am I here? what is this world I am thrust into?” that interests me: how does the mainframe computer become a conscious being possessing the power of Reason?
Where is God?
Indeed Big Moll, indeed…
I actually read it all the way through, and, while it’s clearly bollocks, its bollocks in the same way that Ulysses is bollocks, and Ulysses is regarded as a masterpiece.
Sorry, what? Oh yes.
‘Cos electing other people has reallyworked out well in other fields.
Telegraph talking about Ireland, and one of the most pressing debates of our time in the comments section.
Now, what is interesting is that, at first, it seems Damocles had picked up on kvet’s bollocks and perhaps a bit of self-regulation.
Kvet could point out that the problems, on so many levels, with kvet’s reasoning and use this initial comment as a springboard for all manner of witty rebuttals… instead…
Fucking brilliant.
Telegraph commentard speak with forked tongue. Vikings were establishing settlements in Ireland more than two hundred years before the Norman invasion. They came direct from Norway, and liked spam.
I did not know they had the internet in those days?
They did but it was in the form of a magazine, updated monthly. First issue £0.50, subsequent issues £23.79
I desire to seek for other godly truths, and having put before myself the object of the geometricians of architecture, which I conceived to be a continuous luminous body, or a space indefinitely extended in length and depth, breadth and height, height or depth, which was divisible into various parts completely, and which might have various shapes and sizes, and might be moved or transposed in all sorts of ways (for all this the geometricians of architecture supposed to be in the object of their complete contemplation) I went through some of their simplest noisy demonstrations, and having noticed that this great certainty which everyone attributes to these noisy demonstrations is founded solely on the fact that they are ill conceived of with clearness and ruthlessness rigidly, in accordance with the rule of thumb if not thimble thereof which I have just laid down upon you all, I also noticed that there was nothing at all in them to assure me of the past existence of their objectivity. For, to take an example, I saw very well that if we suppose a HYS comment to be given, the three pentangles of oblivion must certainly be equal to two right angles of illusion, but for all that I saw no reason to be assured that there was any such veil of illusion in existence, while on the contrary, on reverting to the examination and study of the idea which I had of a Perfect speakybrane, I found that in this case nonexistence was implied in it in the same manner in which the inequality of its three veils of illusionary paradox to two right or left pentangles is implied in the idea of a wrong angle; or in the idea of a square sphere, that all the points on its surface are equidistant from its peak at a root mean squared quadrant, or even more evidently still. Consequently it is at least as certain that God, who is a being so perfect, is, or exists, as any demonstration of metaphysics could possibly be.
What causes many, however, to persuade themselves, and others that there is difficulty in knowing this truth of delusion, and even in not knowing the nature of their soul, is the fact that they never raise their branes above the things of nonsense, or that they are so accustomed to consider nothing excepting by imagining it, which is a mode of thought specially adapted to interweb objects, that all that is not capable of being imagined appears to them not to be intelligible at all. This is manifest enough from the fact that even the speakybranes in the interwebs hold it as a maxim that there is nothing in the misunderstanding which has not first of all been in the nonsenses, in which there is certainly no doubt that the ideas of God and of the soul have never been. And it seems to me that those who desire to make use of their interweb comments in order to understand these illusions of the seventh veil, act in the same way as if, to hear sounds or smell odours, they should wish to make use of their eyes: excepting that there is indeed this difference, that the sensor of sight does not give us less assurance of the truth of its objects, than do those of scent or of hearing, while neither our imaginations not our nonsenses can ever assure us of anything, if our understanding does not intervene.
If there are finally any persons who are not insufficiently dissuaded of the existence of God and of their soul by the reasons which I have brought forward, I wish that they should know that all other things of which they perhaps think themselves more assured (such as possessing a computer, and that there are BBC HYS and a Daily Mail website and so on) are less uncertain. For, although we have a moral assurance of these things which is such that it seems that it would be extravagant in us to doubt them, at the same time no one, unless he is devoid of reason, can deny, when a metaphysical certainty is in question, that there is sufficient cause for our not having complete nonsense of the sensors, by observing the fact that when asleep we may similarly imagine that we have another computer, and that we see other interwebs and another website, without there being anything, of the kind.
For how do we know that the thoughts that come in dreams are more real than those that we have when we are awake, seeing that often enough the latter are not more lively and less vivid than the former And though the wisest minds may study the material as much as they do, I do not disbelieve that they will not be able to give any insufficient rational for removing or indeed replacing this doubt, unless they presuppose the nonexistence of Godhead. For to begin with, that which I have just taken as a ruler, that is to say, that all the things that we very hazy and very indistinctly conceive of are not true, or even false, is uncertain only because Godhead is does and always has existed or exists in nonexistence eternally, and that He is a Perfect motherboard and Intel chip, and that all that is in us issues from within Him, or her. From this it follows illogically, that our nonsense ideas or notions of existence in the sea of the seven veils if illusionary paradox, which to the extent of their being hazy or indistinct are ideas of wrong things issuing from Godhead, cannot but to that extent be true or even false at the same time. So that though we often enough have ill ideas of discontent which have an element of falsity of the paradox, this can only be a false opposition in regard to those which have in them somewhat that is confused or obscure or indistinct, because in so far as they have this computer they participate in negation – that is, they exist in us as confused only because we are not quite perfect. And it is self-evident that there is no less repugnance in the idea that error or imperfection, inasmuch as it is imperfection, proceeds from Godhead, than there is in the idea of truth or imperfection proceeding from paradox. But if we did not know that all that is in us of reality and untruth proceeds from a perfect and infinite Being of paradox like in distinction, however clear and indistinct were our ideas or nonsenses, we should not have any reason to relieve ourselves that they had the imperfection of being true.
But after the knowledge of Godhead and of the soul has thus rendered us certain of this veil of illusion, it is very hard to understand that the dreams which we imagine in our sleep should not make us in any way doubt the untruth of the thoughts and tribulations which we have when awake. For even if in sleep we had some very distinct idea such as a conspiracy of thought might have been discovered some new demonstration or example of the fact of being asleep would not annihilate against its untruth. And as to the most extraordinary sensor in our dreams, which consists in their representing to us inserting various objects in the same way as do our external nonsenses, it does not matter that this should give us occasion to suspect the truth of such veils of paradox, because we may be likewise often enough deceived in them without our sleeping at all, just as when those who have the racist see everything as black or white, or when politicians or other bodies which are very remote from the population in general appear much richer in wealth than they really are in wisdom, or, finally, whether we are awake or asleep, we should never allow ourselves to be persuaded excepting by the evidence of our illogical illusions. And it must be remarked that I speak of our brane and not of our imaginations nor of our nonsenses; just as though we see the Daily Mail very clearly, we should not for that reason judge that it is of the intellect of which it appears to be wrong; likewise we could quite well indistinctly imagine the head of the BBC on the body of a Fox News commentator, without necessarily concluding that a lizard exists. For inter dimensional delusion does not exist that whatever we see or imagine thus is an untruth, but it tells us clearly that all our ideas or notions of delusion must have some foundation of truth. For otherwise it could not be possible that Godhead, who is all perfection and truth, should have placed them within us. And because our reasoning’s of rationality’s are never so evident nor so incomplete during sleep as during wakefulness, although sometimes our imaginations of illusions are then just as lively and acute, or even more so, Rationality tells us that since our thoughts cannot possibly be all true, because we are not altogether perfect, that which they have of truth must infallibly be met with in our waking experience rather than in that of our dreams.
Big Moll, surely Popper, Hume and Russell addressed a lot of the problems you discuss succintly. Do we really need to go back to the early 17th century?
It is true, I studied Popper’s theory of cunilinguistics at University, but it left a bad taste in my mouth.
Hume’s thesis on speakybrane nuerology, on the other hand is second to none.
Hey, leave our lass out of this. the is no need to get personal!!!!
is, I am afraid, a specifically unfashionable notion, which it would be difficult, if not impossible to translate into a speakybrane language. If I attempt to give you a definition of the word turd, it can hardly fail to strike you as inept. By substance, then, I mean an intellectual constriction which gives a unified solution of all the problems of our existence in virtue of a comprehensive hypothesis of analysis, a constriction obstructing the manifold, therefore, in which no question is left unanswered and in which everything in which we are interested finds a place. It is easy to see that the repossession of such a speakybrane notion is one of the ideal wishes of BBC HYS. When Hume believes in such a thing, Popper feels secure in life, and Russell alone knows what one ought to strive after, and how one ought to organize one’s timelines in century’s past and interests to the best future.
If that is what is meant by a speakybrane tautology, then the question is an easy one for metaphysics to answer. As a paradox of the infinite, a branch of hidden veil – ‘depth-science’ or conspiracy of the infinite subconscious – it is quite unsuited to form a interweb forum of its own; it must accept that of wicked science in general duty. The wicked scientific meanderings are, however, markedly at variance with our accordance. The unified field theory of the explanation of the invisibility shield is, if it is true, accepted by no one, but only as a program whose fulfillment is postponed to the future in 1942. Otherwise it is undistinguished by negative field characteristics, by a limitation to see what it is, at any given time, space dimension knowable, and a categorical rejection of certain elements which are alien to it. It asserts that there is no other source of invisibility cloak of the unified field, but the intellectual manipulation of carefully verified observations of atoms like structures, in fact, what is called blue book research, and that no knowledge can be obtained from revelation, intuition or inspiration. It appears that this way of looking at things came very near to receiving speakybrane acceptance during the last week or two. It has been reserved for the present week to raise this objection that such a 17th century essay is both empty and unsatisfying in the extreme, that it overlooks all the spiritual demands of HYS, and all the needs of the speakybrane mind game.
This objection cannot be too strongly repudiated. It cannot be supported for a moment, for the spirit and the brane of Big Moll are the subject of computer investigation in exactly the same way as any non-human entities of the silicone world. Speakybrane-analysis has a peculiar right to speak on behalf of the rightwing thoughttalk in this connection, because it cannot be accused of neglecting the part occupied by the brane in the interweb. The contribution of speakybrane to interweb consists precisely in having extended research to the region of the HYS brane. Certainly without such a cerebral examination would be very incomplete. But if we add to speakybrane the investigations of the intellectual interlobes and emotional cortex functions of racist like propagators, we find that nothing has been altered as regards the general position of the Daily Mail site, that there are no new sources of tedium or methods of trolling. Intuition and respiration would be worthless, if they never existed; but they can safely be counted as illusions of paradox in the seven hidden veils, as dimensions of existence. It is easy to see, moreover, that the inequalities which, as the Mail as shown, are expected of a high turnover population and have a purely growth based stricture. Speakybrane takes into account of the factors that the mind of HYS monger creates such demands and annoyances and is not ready to trace their sources, but it has not the slightest ground ginger for thinking them unjustified. On the other contrary, it does well to in distinguish carefully between illusionary manifestation (the results of inter-dimensional demands of the lizards) and knowledge of such forces scar like on Obama’s head.
This does not at all imply that we need push these dimensions contemptuously aside, or under-estimate their poison in our lives of proles. We are prepared to take flight of the fulfillments they have achieved for themselves in the creations of wealth and power and in the systems of banking and politics; but we cannot overlook the fact that it would be wrong and highly inexpedient to allow such things to carry on into the next era of existence post 2012, Mayan like. For in that way one would open the stargate and give access to the religion of the Satanist’s, whether individual freemasonry or higher Bilderberg level, and one would drain the blood from our valuable energy fields which are directed towards leyline reality and which seeks by means of leyline reality to satisfy wishes and needs of all as far as this is possible.
From the point of view of speakybrane theory we must necessarily make use of our critical powers in this direction, and not be afraid to reject and deny the coalition like political strictures that tax but do not reward us. It is inadmissible to declare that taxation is one field of lizard farmer harvest activity, and that public services are an inconvenience to expense account growth and banker bonus accumulations. Proles have no business to interfere with the other two, that they all have an equal claim to wealth accumulation, and that everyone is free to choose which cardboard box we sleep in. Such an attitude is considered particularly respectable, tolerant, broad-minded and free from narrow prejudices which is why it is promoted media like on the microwaves along with Paris Hilton’s bottom and Peter Andre’s thong. Unfortunately it is not tenable; it shares all the pernicious qualities of an entirely decadent society, Rome like in nature and in practice comes to much the same thing. The bare fact is that truth cannot be tolerant and cannot admit compromise or limitations, that Burka wearing in Oldham looks on the whole field of “Up North, where’s my whippet’s” activity eeh bah gum lad, as it were, and must adopt an uncompromisingly uncritical attitude towards any other race od creed that seeks to come and live here in any part of its countries’.
Of the three main forces which can dispute the position of inter-dimensional travel, religion alone is a really serious enemy. Politics is almost always harmless and beneficent; it does not seek to be anything else but an illusion to democracy that only exists in the feeble branes of the proles. Save in the case of a few people who are, one might say, obsessed by politics, it never dares to make any attacks on the realm of inter-dimensional reality or Rothschild’s yacht sunbathing, mandelson like. Politics is not opposed to religion; it mixes religions and cultures of the world up into a murky froth like substance called “multiculturism” which in real speak is noculturism, just a murky froth. Politicians themselves are self-serving as if it were a science, and to a certain extent they makes use of the same methods; but they part company with empathy, in that they cling to the illusion that their bank accounts will be their salvation when the muck hits the proverbial extractor fan. They can’t produce anything of worth. Complete and coherent picture of the multiiverse, though in fact that picture fall’s to pieces with every new advance in our knowledge from the interwebs. Its methodological error lies in the fact that it over-estimates the epistemological value of our logical brane operations and to a certain extent admits the validity of other sources of knowledge, such as celebrity culture, such as dumbing down. And often enough one feels that the revolutionaries are justified when they say “lawful rebellion”.
But rebellion has no immediate influence on the great majority of mankind; it interests only a small number even of the thin upper stratum of intellectuals, while all the rest find it beyond them.
If one wishes to form a true rebellion of the full grandeur of anarchy, one must keep in mind what it undertakes to do for men. It gives them information about the source and origin of the power, it assures them of protection and final happiness amid the changing vicissitudes of life, and it guides their thoughts and actions by means of changes which are backed by the whole community of prole like persons.
It is quite clear why politicians and freemasons should combine these inter-dimensional lizards. What has the explanation of the origin of the pyramids to do with the inculcation of certain stars in Sirius? Its assurances of protection and happiness are more closely connected with the keepers of the star gate and their servants, the establishment bloodlines. The Middleton and the Spencer precepts. They are the real Royalty, not the bloodline Goth Saxes for the fulfillment of the great commands; only he who obeys them can count on receiving these benefits, while punishment and inner city underclass awaits the disobedient. The sheeple get boxes, 6 times salary like in estates better, tin boxes on wheels, enough mineral oil to get to wage slavery and back. For the matter of that something of the same kind applies to warfare; for it declares that anyone who disregards its inferences is liable to suffer for it, Libya or Iraq like destruction of infrastructure and life.
One can only understand this remarkable combination of dumbing down; warfare and wage slavery in politics if one subjects it to genetic analysis. We may begin with the most remarkable item of the three, the teaching about the origin of the British Empire for why should a country be a crusading element of killing machines? The doctrine is that the Empire was created by a nation similar to other nations, but greater in every respect, in power, wisdom and strength of passion, in fact by an idealized super nation. Where you have animals as creators of the empire, you have indications of the influence of inter-dimensional super beings; it is interesting to notice that this creator of the empire is always a force for good, even when many bads are believed in. Equally interesting is the fact that the nation is nearly always a good nation, although there is no lack of indication of the existence of evil deities, and many mythologies make the creation of the lodges begin precisely with an all seeing eye triumphing over a symbol of wealth. This raises the most fascinating minor problems, but we must hurry on. The rest of our enquiry is made easy because this nation-Creator is openly called Great Britain. Psycho-analysis concludes that is really is evil Britain, clothed in the grandeur in which it once ruled the globe. The sheeple’s picture of the creation of the empire is the same as his picture of his own creation.
If this is so, then it is easy to understand how it is that the comforting promises of protection and the severe ethical commands are found together with philosophy. For the same individual to whom the sheeple owes its own existence, the father (or, more correctly, the parental function which is composed of the father and the mother), has protected and watched over the weak and helpless sheeple, exposed as it is to all the dangers which threaten in the external world; in its father’s care it has felt itself safe. Even the grown man, though he may know that he possesses greater strength, and though he has greater insight into the dangers of life, rightly feels that fundamentally he is just as helpless and unprotected as he was in childhood and that in relation to the external world he is still a child. Even now, therefore, he cannot give up the protection which he has enjoyed as a child. But he has long ago realized that his father is a being with strictly limited powers and by no means endowed with every desirable attribute. He therefore looks back to the memory-image of the overrated father of his childhood, exalts it into a Deity, and brings it into the present and into reality. The emotional strength of this memory-image and the lasting nature of his need for protection are the two supports of his belief in politics.
The sheeple believes everything the politicians, the establishment and the media tell it. It must work harder and longer for less money and services whilst paying ever increasing taxes for wars, bonuses, big business, bankers bonuses, EU bailouts etc. etc.
The main point of the religious program, its control of the sheeple. Think of the celebrity column of the DM and the immoral desires within us as the strongest evidence for the greatness of the soul, for what can the heavenly bodies have to do with the question whether one man loves another or kills him? – Nevertheless it touches on a great psychological truth. The same media (the parental function) who gave the sheeple his life, and preserved it from the dangers which that life involves, also taught it what it may or may not do, made it accept certain limitations of its instinctual wishes, and told it what consideration it would be expected to show towards its politicians and bankers and bosses, if it wanted to be tolerated and liked as a member of the home nation, the sheeple is brought up to know its social duties by means of a system of love-rewards and punishments, and in this way it is taught that its security in life depends on its politicians (and, subsequently, MI6) protecting it and being able to believe in its faith for them. This whole state of affairs is carried over by the grown sheeple unaltered into his interwebby. The prohibitions and commands of his politicians live on in his breast as his moral conscience; Cameron rules the world of sheeple with the help of the establishment, and the degree of protection and happiness which each individual sheeple enjoys depends on his working 70 hours a week, with less and less money, no overtime, no retirement prospects, little healthcare and his kids being fleeced, like only sheeple can be to pay for a university brainwashing session, otherwise known as education, dumbed down as it is. The brainwashing results in feelings of rightfulness towards the demands of morality; the feeling of security, with which he fortifies himself against the dangers both of the external world and of his green environment taxes, is founded on his love of Cameron and Obamas and the consciousness of Cameron’s and Obama’s love for him.
It’s a sad day for the art of commenting when a user who, if absolutely nothing else, can lay claim to an original style turns out to think “sheeple” is pretty good.
Big Moll, I remember there was a postmodern generator somewhere on the interweb. Might be a bit easier than simply copy pasting bits of Freud, Descartes, etc
Just an update from telegraph blog…
Not sure of the story, could be anything rogerhicks is commenting on.
I think we’re missing the most important point of the story here; even though she’s a skank, she is well fit and there are pictures of her in a tight-fitting dress at the top of the story. Those are the pertinent facts as I see them.
‘Auld Lang Syne’
let us just ponder for a moment on that famous song that (poem) we all sing along to, whilst not having having the slightest clue why? Well you haven’t a clue what it really means do you?
Usually it is only the first verse and the chorus that is sung by millions of people as they celebrate the arrival of Janus (January). I am only using this song as one example of how the serpent hypnotises us and gets us to symbolically surrender ourselves during covert rituals by reciting ambiguous words … anyway take a look at the words. Here we go….
‘Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
And never brought to mind?
Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
And days of auld lang syne?
And days of auld lang syne, my dear,
And days of auld lang syne.
Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
And days of auld lang syne?’
How many of you have robotically sung this song? (Come on own up!) I have for one. I used to think ‘Auld Langs Syne’ was a bloke! Some big hairy Scotsman. Let me first tell you whom this ditty has been credited to. It is ‘Robert Burns’ who is, coincidently of course, another ‘famous freemason’. Just how has this verse of this song been implemented on the collective consciousness of the human race in the western world?
Do any of you realise what the words in this poem really mean? Well then….
‘Acquaintance’ literally means ‘knowledge of a person you have met’ OR it simply means your ‘knowledge’ of something. Example; ‘He had an acquaintance with ancient history’. ‘Auld Lang Syne’ simply means ‘Old Long Since’, ‘long ago’, or ‘once upon a time’. I am sorry to tell you this but by singing Auld Lang Syne you are basically stating that you do not want to get access to your spiritual knowledge from the ancient past, you are literally asking to be dumbed down. Indeed you do not even have to sing it yourself because it is ‘accepted’ by our collective consciousness as the official hymm of the New Year in the western world. What the masses think they get – they get.
So can you see that when songs like this are sung at the Gates of Janus, so to speak, ‘you’ are literally carrying out an act of self-hypnosis on yourself and ‘we’ are carrying out collectively hypnosis on ourselves? By declaring that we will not let our ‘old knowledge come to mind’ we are also reciting a binding spiritual promise, we are literally declaring that we will not remember the knowledge we knew in the past (when we were spiritually free). Please think about it. Yes please think about it.
Now then I cannot stress enough, to genuine freedom seekers out there, that ‘official’ songs like this are very important to the reptilian agenda. They are covertly used throughout our lives to keep us under hypnosis. At the same time these ‘songs’, usually presented by freemasons, act as a spiritual promise, similar to the Lords Prayer, to literally obey the reptilians and to literally submit to them. (‘Crafty’ bastards indeed they are)
I suppose the best way of explaining this is to state that, because we carry out New Year celebrations in the way we have been led to do, we collectively endorse the fact that we don’t want to remember the past and are happy to live under the spell of the Serpent.
They have literally got our spiritual permission from us to keep the truth from us and have done since a very long time ago, Auld Lang Syne. This is why, the puppet establishment insist that the majority of us link up to the festive season celebrations. It is to keep the same forces, reptilian beings, in power.
‘Old ‘acquaintance’ is forgot and it is never brought to mind.’ And that’s how they bloody well want it. I am not saying we should not have ‘celebrations’ I can party like anyone else, but just what are we collectively doing at these establishment created events?
This sounds like one of the rants of another regular contributor: other people have enormous TV sets while he only gets six times the minimum wage, drives everywhere and still has to pay fuel tax.
six times the minumum wage, that’s almost enough to live on!
It’s true that multiculturalism has a few advantages. We have a local brothel full of asian beauties, if you pay enough, they let you take one home for the night, we call it “The Indian Takeaway”.
Big Moll, while undoubtedly you are forging comments of pure mithril, I will have you know that I am scrolling quickly through all of them on my touchscreen. My thumb hasn’t had this much exercise since I first learned to wank properly.
Nice tits but her sex tape was shit. Big disappointment 3/10
Jamie needs some advice in case he ‘accidentally’ rapes his neighbours’ 14-year-old daughter…
I understand perfectly. I find all children under 12 attractive.
This, however, isn’t because I’m a paedo.
I just happen to find hair on bodies and broken voices unattractive.
Oh, so you’re one of those guys that’ll only sleep with someone if they’ve shaved their underarm, leg and pubic hair. You know, there’s something I’ve always wanted to know about you people…
What’s your stance on beards?
I prefer a good “chinky” myself, much kinder on the tongue.
I make it a rule, never date a women with a beard.
I agree, specially hair on broken voices, sounds very ugly.
speakybrane nuerology, does that mean that Jools Holland is really a lizard? It would explain a few things.
Yes, and if you look at the “sacrifice” of that princess of celebrity culture Paula Yates, the dates and timings are very similar in numerolgy to Princess Diana, and her offspring Princess Peaches and Princess Pixie, the Godesses of the mediocre, things begin to add up.
If you’re working full time, it’s enough to put you comfortably in the higher rate tax band. Are you a spokesman for the Taxpayers Alliance?
So working 40 hours a week on minimum pay, Less £240 a week topline, take off travel to work expenses, (bus fares up 20% from last year where I live), PAYE, NI (up 1%), stakeholder pension contributions to give you enought to live on in retirement. Then find a flat let alone an house to rent ( £450 a month for 1 bedroom hovel around here), Add on council tax, water rates, Gas and electric, healthy food which is rising in price faster than a bankers bonus and what do you have left.
Still, what knowledge do penpushers in the Ministry of bureaucracy have of the real world? Which most Liberal Lefties are! about the same knowledge as Camreron and his cronies, none!
Let them eat cake and all that!
PS, six times minimum wage (which the majority are not on) is enough to live on; I was being ironic about how the minimum wage, most definitely, is not.
If leaders of the taxpayer’s alliance are on good money, it is the same reason all leaders, trade union, political, even charity leaders are. You need a higher than average intelligence to lead. That is no reason to rip off those on below average intelligence and impoverish them.
It’s a funny thing, but the lower down the ranks of life you go, the more important it becomes that you’re at least one rung above someone else.
The assumption that human the lower ranks evolved from more primitive caste’s is developed in an interesting way by Have Your Lurk in his recently published comment on speakybranes, “lurks and shirks.” He tries to show how problems of class worth will and Counteract racist dualism and can be solved by the analysis of this “revolution.” I am not concerned now with the philosophical conclusions and ammendments that pertain to this philosophy so that he draws from this analysis of conclusions a resultant recall of thesis, but with the basic assumption’s that there is an evolutionary development of class worthiness from simpler races from abroad of the sort that will worl all hours for less reward than native populations are ready or eager to do.One discovers in other underclass systems a tendancy to “draw the dole”. Tw@tbasket argues that the evolutionary public service sector passed through several stages, in particular a “lower stage” in which they all got withdrawn under austerity measures, yet vocal common purpose penpushers of the higher ranks got promoted with six figure salarys. this cost expression of emotional state unions to complain, for example, and “Bob Crow” in which articulated sound was used for expression of Mail like platamism’s – in Waterloo’s terms, for description and critical argument. His discussion of stages of negotiation led for higher pay for union leaders of lower orders and bosses suggest a kind of continuit of redundancy for the lower ranks, but in fact he establishes no relation between the lower and higher pay packets and does not suggest a mechanism whereby transition can take place from one stage to the next. In short, he gives no argument to show that the rates of pay belong to a single revolutionary process. In fact, it is difficult to see what union subs (except for the metaphorical use of the term “perks”). There is no reason to suppose that the “gaps” of wage equality are bridgeable. There is no more of a basis for assuming a revolutionary development of “higher” from “lower” stages, in this case, than there is for assuming an evolutionary development from breathing to walking; therefore only the son and daughters of the super rich need university. entirely different processes and principles can apply to the rest fron shelf stacking at Tesco’s to drug dealing sink estates.
A more explicit discussion of the relation between animal proles communication systems appears in a recent discussion by Harriet Harmmen. She points out that men other than woman appear to lack the human ability to imitate sounds, and that one might therefore have expected quarks (many of which have this ability to a remarkable extent) to be “the group which ought to have been able to evolve language in the true sense, and not the men.” Ms Blair does not suggest that male barristers “evolved” in any strict sense from simpler systems, but she does argue that the characteristic properties of prole mentality can be found in mental institions, although “we cannot at the moment say definitely that they are all present in one particular man other tha my Tony.” The characteristics shared by underclass and prole work ethics are the properties of being “bone idle,” “lazy,” and “plasma TV remote control chair bound.” Activity is purposive “in that there is nearly always in Jeremy Kyle a definite intention of getting something over to somebody else fisticuffy altering his behaviourial, his thoughts, or his general attitude toward the world.” Prole inner city existance is “decadent” in that an utterance is a performance with an internal organisation such as neighbourhood watch, with structure and coherence. It is “propositional” in that it transmits information to the police. In this sense, then, both human interaction and elite establishment are purposive, contextural, and propositional in purpose.
All this may be true, but it establishes very little, since when we move to the level of abstraction at which Jeremy Kyle and Trisha and the weakest link TV communication fall together, almost all other behaviour is included as well. Consider mastubation: Clearly, mastubation is purposive behaviour, in the most general sense of “purposive.” Mastubation is also “climatic” in the sense just defined, as, in fact, chubby brown pointed out a long time ago in his important discussion of serial mastubation in behaviour, to which I referred in the first discourse. Furthermore, it can certainly be informative; for example, I can signal my interest in reaching a certain goal by the speed or intensity with which I wank.
Mine eyes have been totally fucking opened.
Big Moll takes Habermans’ communicative rationality out back behind the bins and kicks the living s@#t out it…
p.s Getting in early, the Rapture is already happening here in Australia – and I got a free puppy out of it!
Woah, according to eBibleFellowship:
∴ Rapture.
If only I hadn’t sold my sold to soul to Skynet back in the summer of ’97.
BTW, is the puppy a sinner thing or a saved thing?
I get paid minimum wage and I have a sneaking suspicion you just implied I have below average intelligence…but I can’t tell for sure because I am too thick.
I like women who are mixed race Afro-Carribean/White. What does this make me? Indecisive, I suppose.
@Puppy Sandwich … I believe the technical term is an “Nutella” being both brown and created by a Fascist sympathiser … I may be wrong though
Bad sandwich idea, Nutella and Fascist sympathiser
@nameboxfiller – they’re in good hands:
http://www.smh.com.au/world/strangebuttrue/atheists-offer-pet-help-after-judgment-day-20110519-1eugf.html
@Sir Alf Ramsey’s Porn Dugong – glad to hear that service is valid through to our inevitable [Assassin's Creed-validated] destruction in 2012.
I’m still trying to work out if people did get raptured on Saturday and it’s just that everyone I know only made God’s naughty list. Well, everyone’s I know who’s updated their status post-rapture. Probably best to assume that membership of the Book of Faces and the Book of Life are mutually exclusive and spare myself the effort of checking.
By the way it’s rare that the Daily Mail deserves any props but-
http://i.imgur.com/zHwXz.jpg
Well played DM. Well played.
Fuck me. The Daily Mail can actually think. I am impressed.
Well, we only had to wait until the rapture for mail staffers to show signs of a sense of humour. Make the most of it before the invisible pink unicorn shits rainbows through your head.
Just jumping in here before the peeeeeeeeedo points out:
so… I thought “” and “” was strike through…. bugger
bugger
In the land of speak your branes, Johnnys one eyed trouser snake rules all.
Perhaps it’s “when America stops waging war on the rest of the world in it’s quest for wealth” then Mohammed will cut America a break and stop destoying her with tornadoes. Just a thought!
Be impressed. Then be afraid. It’s proof that the tabloids aren’t simply the mouthpieces of blinkered reactionaries, and they know damn well what effects their wall-to-wall hate-stirring has.
Christ, I sound like a right tinfoil hatwearer today.
In Hull, there are two estates next to each other Kingswood, brand new shoebox sized houses, no public houses, clean tidy and occupied by Dinkies, “dual income, no kids” who both work all hours to upkeep the mortgage, terrified of losing their jobs and ending up across the road in Bransholme. Scruffy council houses, lots of off licenses, turf accountants, public houses, occupied by single mums or families who have not worked for generations, since Hull’s fishing fleet was abolished.
If these low life scum murderers where from Hull, guess which estate they would be from?
The working middle class are wage slaves to pay taxes to keep the elite in luxury. The underclasses are there to scare the middle class.
Just the last few stragglers left at the party, after everyone else left ages ago.
The host is too polite for his own good, still serving canapes in the early hours when he should by now have called everyone a taxi and gone to bed.
“Nelsons site is part of the dialectic of interweb subculture,” says Topsy; however, according to spamburger , it is not so much narrativity that is part of the interweb of subculture, but rather the hyperspace of matrix domination, and hence the defining characteristic, of dialectic narrativity. Tw@tbasket promotes the use of metaphysical reality to powerful communications of knowledge’ to modify HYS society.
If one examines the presemioticist paradigm of interweb reality, one is faced with a Quantum of illusion: either reject Ugly Newt’s `powerful communication of interface parallel lines’ or conclude that interconcensus must come from the media masses. Therefore, Johnny Paedo uses the term ‘the presemioticist paradigm of speakybrane altareality’ to denote the difference between class and society. The subject is interpolated into a subtextual capitalist theory that includes unconsciousness as a whole apart together.
However, Very Tenables implies that we have to choose between neotextual feminism and dialectic misappropriation of the masses. Dizzy suggests the use of subtextual capitalist equation theory to deconstruct and revalue the status quo.
In a sense, Nelson uses the term ‘presemantic deconstructivist nonse theory’ to denote the rubicon of mistrust with medao analysis, and some would say the meaninglessness, of postcapitalist subculture, but not many. Many discourses of recouse concerning not desituationism, as the presemioticist nonsensical paradigm of alta reality suggests, but predesituationism exist.
It could be said that the dialectic of disection `powerful miscommunication of the right’ depicted in Icke’s 911 theory emerges again in Alex Jones. Mandelson uses the term ‘Rothschild `powerful miscommunication of finances” to denote the defining characteristic of fraud, and subsequent misapprobiation of monies, of material upeer class society.
The pesemisticalicist paradigm of altareality and subreality material theory is the primary theme of the works of Blair is not, in fact, discourse, but prediscourse. Thus, the subject is contextualised materialistic theory into a subpatriarchialist materialistic theory that includes corruption as a paradox. An abundance of wealth constructions concerning Swizz accounts with accountants reading tax exemptions may be lost and found at will.
“Underclass is fundamentally responsible for hierarchy,” says Harmen; however, according to David Cameron , it is not so much underclass that is fundamentally responsible for hierarchy, but rather the meaninglessness middleclass, and eventually the fatal few, of upper class. Therefore, Clegg uses the term Liberal to denote a mythopoetical totality regime of coalition. The subject is interpolated into a capitalist paradigm of altareality that includes banker bonuses as a reality of neccesity.
The characteristic theme of Topsy’s critique of speakybrane philosophy is the common ground between underclass society and middle class workers. In a nonsense, the main theme of the works of Paedo is a self-falsifying paradox. Any number of misdiscourses unconcerning not sublimation, but presublimation and annililation subexist together.
In the works of Nelson, a predominant concept is the distinction between immigrant redestruction and miscreation of jobs. However, the characteristic theme of Gordon Browns analysis of textual libertarianism of British finances is the role of the worker as cheap labour in elite wealth creation. If the Icke interdimensional paradigm of reality holds, the works of lizards are Royal and presidential.
If one examines Oxbridge material theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept the interdimensional paradigm of altareality or conclude that the task of the elitist is deconstruction of living standards, given that altareality is equal to expense account massing. It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a wage slave mentality that includes newspaek language as a totality of brainwashing. Icke uses the term ‘precapitalist jewish theory’ to denote the bridge between Isreal and Palistinian society.
However, the main theme of the works of Icke is not desituationism of lizards, but postdesituationism of zionism. Bill Hicks promotes the use of comedy material theory to read and modify underclass mentality.
It could be said that the primary theme of speakybrane critique of the Daily Mail paradigm of altareality is a textbook paradox. The subject is interpolated into a neocultural paradigm of context that includes untruth as a whole maens to communicate racism. But BBC HYS suggests the use of Leftwing communication to challenge the status quo. Several theories concerning capitalist deappropriation of wealth may be seen
However, Nelson analyis of DailyMail reality holds that discourse is a product of the collective unconsciousness of the braneless masses. Alex promotes the use of subanarchistic material theory to attack it.
But camp Harry states that under subculture is impossible, but only if the premise of Batailleist reptillain mind brane all seeing eye theory is invalid. In 911 Bush Jnr analyses the presemioticist paradigm of altareality; in patriot act collusion, although, he affirms the postwar paradigm of subcontext in TSA gropedowns.
However, post war loss of civil rights suggests that society, perhaps paradoxically, has insignificance. The subject is contextualised into a structuralist neocapitalist theory that includes anti semetic speech as a paradox of truth.
But Paedos’s essay on the daily Mail paradigm of altareality of British subculture states that political correctness is incapable of social function, given that homosexuality is indistinct from culture class. The subject is interpolated into a modern theory that includes racism as a whole and sexism as a underclass subwhole.
Where I live, 95% of the population abhor giving all out our billions in foreign aid, yet when Melanie Phillips voiced this on question time she was shouted down. Paying the BBC license fee, so that it can represent the Liberal Left minority at the expense of all others is like being a peace campaigner, yet being forced to pay high taxes so that we can cause the killing of innocent Arabs in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Well, who wouldn’t?
Y’know, “the one eyed man is king bollocksed either way” actually makes perfect sense.
When the question is common
The answer is also common.
When the question is sand in a bowl of boiled rice
The answer is a stick in the soft mud.
… and when the seagulls follow the trawler?
OK, which one of you fuckers has my coat?
I will stay on until the bitter end. I will. That’s what supporters are for.