<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>spEak You&#039;re bRanes &#187; Shit Sherlocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/category/shit-sherlocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com</link>
	<description>A collection of ignorance, narcissism, stupidity, hypocrisy and bad grammar.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Walk</title>
		<link>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/07/26/dont-walk/</link>
		<comments>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/07/26/dont-walk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dizzy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Delusions of Grandeur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Prats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-appointed Sages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shit Sherlocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/?p=5613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tagnut of the day award on 22nd July went to gabriel100 for his standout performance on the Graun&#8217;s Ian Tomlinson article.
I&#8217;d like to count the ways gabriel100 makes everyone think he&#8217;s a bucket of mung, but it&#8217;s much easier to just post a couple of his comments and call him a twat.
Completely the correct decision.
It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tagnut of the day award on 22nd July went to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/users/gabriel100/comments"><strong>gabriel100</strong></a> for his standout performance on the Graun&#8217;s <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jul/22/ian-tomlinson-police-not-charged">Ian Tomlinson article</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to count the ways <strong>gabriel100</strong> makes everyone think he&#8217;s a bucket of mung, but it&#8217;s much easier to just post a couple of his comments and call him a twat.</p>
<blockquote><p>Completely the correct decision.</p>
<p>It was wrong of the officer to push him, but really it was his lifestyle which caused his death, not a mere innocuous fall (which even a frail pensioner would have gotten up from).</p>
<p>Tomlison completely brought it upon himself. A group of stressed, frightened and pent-up Police Officers are trying to clear a street. Tomlinson is being needless awkward, taking baby steps, refusing to move along etc. Thus, someone lost his temper and gave him a little shove. Its all there in the video &#8211; no more to it than that.</p>
<p>I have zero respect for people who wrongly demonise the Police, and even less for those who like to act up to antagonise the Police, then wail like a pathetic child when they get what is coming to them.</p>
<p>So, the correct decision is not to prosecute and I am equally delighted for the officer as I was for Sgt Delroy Smellie, (another cop whom that digusting rabble of rioters that day had unfairly complained about &#8211; they didn&#8217;t like him hitting back after he was assaulted, it seems).<br />
<strong>gabriel100</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>They had Tomlinson bang to rights, and no mistake. Not only was he on the chubby side and sold newspapers for a living &#8211; common sense tells you that&#8217;s a diet of Micro Chips and Fray Bentos &#8211; but he was <em>walking</em> away from the police, with his <em>hands</em> in his <em>pockets</em>! That&#8217;s antagonising behaviour if you ask me. What else do you call not running for your fucking life when you&#8217;ve got a bunch of titheads with the mist bearing down on you? Didn&#8217;t Tomlinson know that coppers and dogs work on fear? And Pedigree Chum?</p>
<p><strong>gabriel100</strong>, though &#8211; this crusty thong string isn&#8217;t done. Clearly not satisfied with the general thrust of public opinion in the Guardian &#8211; that he&#8217;s a twat &#8211; he goes on to prove that not only is comment free, but it&#8217;s also really shit and depressing.</p>
<blockquote><p>I notice that the posters who disagreed with my analysis above chose to abuse my character in response, rather than take issue with my version of events (simply a commentry of the Guardian&#8217;s own video).</p>
<p>I will take that as a grudging acceptance that I am right on the matter.</p>
<p>Some of the idiocy on this thread beggers belief. Some fool actually criticised the Police for being scared and excitable after a day of being pelted with missiles and chemicals by an army of aggressive scum, who were intent on violence from the word go.</p>
<p>Many other countries would have dealt with that riot by breaking out the tanks and machine guns, and yet the feeble minded contributors here bleat about kettling and a wee push in the back.</p>
<p>Imagine you went down the shops after work today, and someone was in your face, not allowing you to move freely, ignoring requests to let you past etc &#8211; what would you do? You might eventually lose your temper and give the person a shove. Its not right, but understandable. And all the more understandable after having fought a medieval type battle against the far left mob polluting the streets and causing violence that day,</p>
<p>The British Police are the best in the world. Go live in Burma or something, see how you like their Police &#8211; you would come crawling back singing the praises of our bobbies.<br />
<strong>gabriel100</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, if you hate the British police so much, why don&#8217;t you fuck off and live somewhere <em>much</em> worse &#8211; for example, somewhere where the police might clobber you from behind after they catch you walking down the street the wrong way? And then try living somewhere they lie about what happened until a hedge fund manager with a camera phone shows them up for the cunts they always have been. And then when you&#8217;re done living <em>there</em>, why don&#8217;t you try living somewhere it&#8217;s easier to get to the shops. </p>
<p>Honestly, we used to be a nation of shopkeepers. Now you can&#8217;t even get a packet of Rich Tea without being harrassed on the high street by a false analogy. </p>
<p>Wow, and just let me say that I&#8217;m glad I got through this without resorting to abusing <b>gabriel100</b>&#8217;s character! It&#8217;d be a terrible world where I didn&#8217;t spend my time arguing the toss with a half-blind, sociopathic semen stain with the social awareness of a sackful of monkey abortions. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/07/26/dont-walk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>14-0 England More Like</title>
		<link>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/07/08/14-0-england-more-like/</link>
		<comments>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/07/08/14-0-england-more-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Permanently Bewildered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plain Weird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shit Sherlocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/?p=5464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Rónán. On that Bloody Sunday report a while back. Ever think it&#8217;s crazy how judges/PC liberals decide on goodies and baddies based on who does good things and who does bad things, rather than who is a lion with a plucky sidekick and who has bumbling henchmen and a skull for a face? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Rónán. On that <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/haveyoursay/2010/06/bloody_sunday_report_your_view.html">Bloody Sunday report</a> a while back. Ever think it&#8217;s crazy how judges/PC liberals decide on goodies and baddies based on who does good things and who does bad things, rather than who is a lion with a plucky sidekick and who has bumbling henchmen and a skull for a face? Well you&#8217;re not alone.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>lochraven wrote:</strong><br />
Isn&#8217;t it funny how people&#8217;s sense of right and wrong changes with each circumstance, and who&#8217;s doing what to whom? I think this whole incident should be called a draw. No winners, and no losers. Stop looking for a villain, it&#8217;ll get you nowhere.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s funnier how people&#8217;s sense of flat-head and cross-head depends on what screw they&#8217;re screwing into what. Where&#8217;s the consistency, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/07/08/14-0-england-more-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stalking For A Fairer Britain</title>
		<link>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/07/01/stalking-for-a-fairer-britain/</link>
		<comments>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/07/01/stalking-for-a-fairer-britain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gainsbourg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curtain Twitchers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Permanently Bewildered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-appointed Sages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shit Sherlocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/?p=5501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, kids. Remember the 1980s revival a few years back? Well, here it is again, this time with added social realism. Just as George Osborne is getting ready to make 1.3 million people unemployed, the government is going to sew up disability benefits so tightly that only limbless, headless torsos and brains in jars will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, kids. Remember the 1980s revival a few years back? Well, here it is again, this time with added social realism. Just as George Osborne is getting ready to make 1.3 million people unemployed, the government is going to sew up disability benefits so tightly that only limbless, headless torsos and brains in jars will qualify. Honestly, it&#8217;s like punk only just happened!</p>
<p>But what do the spluttering breadheads at <a href="//www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=507267&amp;in_page_" target="blank">This Is Money</a> think? Go on, guess.</p>
<p>Thanks to Ken.</p>
<blockquote><p>Quite right too.<br />
Recently I followed a couple of people after they had signed on for their job seekers dole and found that 5 of them were actually working,one guy as a betting shop manager only yards from the dole office he uses.Time to stop these spongers.<br />
<b>R Markson, Manchester</b></p></blockquote>
<p>Ladies. Can you make out that figure over there, crouching in the bushes outside your house? That&#8217;s R Markson. But don&#8217;t worry! He&#8217;s only making sure you don&#8217;t commit any benefit fraud or anything. Just act like he&#8217;s not there. Don&#8217;t you normally do some stretches about this time?</p>
<blockquote><p>The labour party paid out beefits willy nilly only to buy votes<br />
<b>Mike, Penzance</b></p></blockquote>
<p>I remember when the Labour party came round offering me beefits concealed in a discreet brown envelope. But I was smart. I told them I couldn&#8217;t promise to vote for them, although I might after a little more persuasion. Well, they were dropping by twice a week after that, right up to polling day. Now I can&#8217;t move for fucking beefits. They&#8217;re making my life hell. Please help me.</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s interesting that people say there aren&#8217;t enough jobs to go round, yet half a million Poles showed up here a couple of years back and found work immediately &#8211; for example working in the chicken factory in Llanelli, or picking cabbages in Essex. When I was chucked out of a high-paying job twenty-five years ago I spent 3 months driving trucks, stacking paint in warehouses, and shifting furniture for LESS than I would have got on the rock&#8217;n'roll (since I had a wife and two kids). At the end of that period I still couldn&#8217;t find a job so I started my own business, working out of the back bedroom.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s where the jobs come from, chaps. Once you go on benefits, you&#8217;ll never get off again &#8211; starter jobs always pay less.<br />
<b>Jim Blythe, Cardiff</b></p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, scumbags, that&#8217;s where the jobs come from &#8211; Jim&#8217;s back bedroom, where you&#8217;ll find a low-resolution video camera, three barrels of vegetable oil and a pile of beefits that goes all the way up to the ceiling. Apply in writing, with photo. No time wasters.</p>
<blockquote><p>Is it me or have i started seeing things,since the chancellor anounced he is going to start cutting incapacity benefit, there has has been a sudden surge in wheelchairs and walking sticks? from people who look like they do not need them ?? two words spring to mind &#8211; CON ARTISTS..<br />
<b>Michael, lancs</b></p></blockquote>
<p>Personally, Michael, I think you&#8217;re fucking cracked. But it would be a suspicious coincidence, wouldn&#8217;t it? The Treasury announces a crackdown on benefit fraud, so naturally a load of people go out and commit benefit fraud. It makes perfect sense when you don&#8217;t think about it.</p>
<blockquote><p>yeah bring it on, but i don&#8217;t think it will happen, there isn&#8217;t any jobs anyway,unless we send all immigrant s home that wouldn&#8217;t b a bad thing,british jobs for english workers<br />
<b>N Thatcher, bath</b></p></blockquote>
<p>Nargaret is going all-out imperialistic on us. British jobs for English workers. So fuck you, the Scottish! Get out, Welshers, this call centre is ours now! Nice restaurant you&#8217;ve got here, Irish. Be a terrible shame if it suddenly got taken over by the English. Whoops, butterfingers!</p>
<blockquote><p>Don&#8217;t just cut benefits, reduce the number of benefits there are &#8211; housing benefit/local housing allowance should be combined with jobseekers allowance instead of administered separately. If people can&#8217;t be trusted to pay their rent themselves, that&#8217;s their problem.</p>
<p>Privatise Jobcentre Plus, and make its staff behave like recruitment consultants driven by targets &#8211; and scrap the useless Pathways to Work scheme &#8211; there is nothing that they can&#8217;t do that can&#8217;t be done by jobclubs.<br />
Merge or shut down most universities (especially ex-polytechnics) and make companies take on apprentices. One family friend started work as an articled clerk and retired as a circuit judge &#8211; we need to return to that instead of lumbering people with student debts for useless degrees.<br />
<b>Jobseeker, South London</b></p></blockquote>
<p>I can see what Jobseeker did here. Having demanded an unworkable oversimplification of our complex system of benefits, and called for Jobcentre staff to effectively retrain as recruitment consultants &#8211; because we need more of them in the world &#8211; Jobseeker (who I&#8217;m going to assume is a man because I&#8217;m a dreadful misandrist) read back his post and, being an utter fucking cockslap, thought to himself, &#8220;no, this is far too reasonable. What can I do to make myself seem even more insanely rightwing and stupid? Ah, I know: &#8217;shut down most universities.&#8217; High five!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/07/01/stalking-for-a-fairer-britain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carl Sagan</title>
		<link>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/06/17/journey-of-the-wizard-to-saturn/</link>
		<comments>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/06/17/journey-of-the-wizard-to-saturn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shit Sherlocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Regular Twats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/?p=5456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Reith Lectures &#8211; &#8220;What We&#8217;ll Never Know&#8221;.  
Ever wondered what it&#8217;d be like if Nigel Tufnel ate Timothy Leary&#8217;s handbag and then gave a lecture on astronomy, the speed of light, information and A Very Big Number?  Nor me,  and yet here it is.
It is impossible for humans to know everything, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Reith Lectures &#8211; &#8220;What We&#8217;ll Never Know&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Ever wondered what it&#8217;d be like if Nigel Tufnel ate Timothy Leary&#8217;s handbag and then gave a lecture on astronomy, the speed of light, information and A Very Big Number?  Nor me,  and yet here it is.</p>
<blockquote><p>It is impossible for humans to know everything, we are restricted in our knowledge by time and distance.</p>
<p>There are infinate things that we know of but just cannot do/achieve/experience ourselves now or even by a million years into the future.</p>
<p>I have a little print out above my computer monitor which I scribbled a few years ago. It says-</p>
<p>Infinity of knowledge</p>
<p>Knowledge is so great that even if human knowledge was enough to fill the density of a billion worlds, it would still be significantly less than one trillionth of knowledge still to learn.</p>
<p>We have computers that can count numbers that most of us would just find impossible to even get a grasp of. We know of numbers that even if humans counted one by one for a trillion years it would still take a bigger/greater number of years than most people could understand.</p>
<p>Humans will never know so much because we are just so limited.</p>
<p>Most people do not know what number a &#8220;googol&#8221; is. Its a number with 1000 zeros, its impossible for a human to count up to it without the aid of technology, (the numbber 1 million just has 6 zeros in comparison). A number that is so astranomically bigger than a &#8220;googol&#8221; is a &#8220;googol plex&#8221;. A &#8220;googolplex&#8221; is so vast that we do not even know what it is so a googolplex plus one is an impossibility to know and is basically irrelevent.</p>
<p>To travel to outside our planetry neighbourhood would take much longer than the lifetime of one individual, hence even travelling for a million lifetimes we would not be able to reach that which we can see via telescopes etc. Which means that ALL the available knowledge of ALL that which is just in one direct linear line 1mm wide is beyond our capacity to have knowledge about, let alone 360 degrees around us.</p>
<p>In all things, if we were to measure our knowledge on a solar ruler in milimetres (one ruler is the distance between the sun and earth), the knowledge we have presently attained is MUCH MUCH less than 1 millionth of millimetre in comparison to knowledge that is waiting out there for humans to try and learn about.</p>
<p>I think the greatest knowledge we can have is that which we know about the wonderous events which led us to our existance and that knowledge which we are capable of using to maximise our continued existance for as long as humanly possible.<br />
<strong>MrWonderfulReality</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>What a speech!  Someone fetch this man some robes! From this day forth I shall gaze up into the cosmos with a renewed sense of wonder.  Future generations of scientists will describe the day when, as young children, they ravenously devoured the words of MrWonderfulReality and first knew that they would dedicate their lives to studying&#8230; um.. massive great.. um.. stuff..  and .. well.. you know.. googolplonkers and numbers and sky-millimetres and.. like.. complicated, whirly, infinite shit.</p>
<p>Why are you still sat there reading this??? GO AND BUY A FUCKING TELESCOPE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/06/17/journey-of-the-wizard-to-saturn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>140</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surely</title>
		<link>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/06/15/surely/</link>
		<comments>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/06/15/surely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Permanently Bewildered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shit Sherlocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/?p=5447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently everyone at the world cup is blowing these plastic horns called vuvuzelas and they&#8217;re making everything sound like b-flat.
If it is a constant note then surely erecting a massive speaker broadcasting the same note in reversed amplitude will counteract it and make it virtually disappear. Same prinicipal as in cockpits and noise cancelling equipment. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently everyone at the world cup is blowing these plastic horns called vuvuzelas and they&#8217;re making everything sound like b-flat.</p>
<blockquote><p>If it is a constant note then surely erecting a massive speaker broadcasting the same note in reversed amplitude will counteract it and make it virtually disappear. Same prinicipal as in cockpits and noise cancelling equipment. But then all it will take is the next generation of vuvuzela, a few hundred Hz off frequency for this expensive equipment to be rendered useless&#8230; even worse this will then be heard to make a loud noise of its own with nothing to cancel it out.<br />
<b>Mark Dowle, Abingdon, UK</b></p></blockquote>
<p>It seems so obvious but, like so many apparently brilliant ideas, it turns out to cause more problems than it solves.  The &#8220;Massive Amplitude-Reversed Drone Speaker&#8221; (MARDS) was actually built just after the war, by scientists who hoped it could cancel out the sound of fascism.  These boffins tuned it to an annoying frequency, and then left it droning on and on about how brilliant it is.  Sadly, after a terrible calibration error, MARDS thinks it invented television, teenagers, custard, &#8220;being over 30&#8243;, tennis, &#8220;being over 40&#8243;, the printing press, talking loudly, ignoring people, &#8220;being over 50&#8243;, &#8220;being over 60&#8243;, droning, and sesame seeds.  We know it now as Janet Street-Porter and nobody can work out how to turn the fucking thing off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/06/15/surely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2510.4 Is Much Too Many</title>
		<link>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/06/14/2510-4-is-much-too-many/</link>
		<comments>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/06/14/2510-4-is-much-too-many/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Permanently Bewildered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plain Weird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shit Sherlocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/?p=5413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Heidi and a few other peeps who squirted this one up my tube.  Not sure what the subject was. Something along the lines of &#8220;The internet gives a fuck. Honest. Send advice please&#8221;.
the question should be save not spend.
I agree that the NHS should be &#8220;protected&#8221; I do not believe that government, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Heidi and a few other peeps who squirted this one up my tube.  Not sure what the subject was. Something along the lines of &#8220;The internet gives a fuck. Honest. Send advice please&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote><p>the question should be save not spend.<br />
I agree that the NHS should be &#8220;protected&#8221; I do not believe that government, or anybody should not allow the NHS to defend their place in the market place.<br />
I have visited several hospitals all over, and I park myself in a strategic place for 5 minutes and write the activities going on around me. Excluding cleaning staff, in the best case 41 staff, Doctors, Nurses, Admin etc. walked past. Doing nothing but walking up and down corridors, the worst case there were 76 people of similar stature, just walking several with clip boards, doing absolutely nothing. The average of all the Hospitals together is 52.3 persons per 5 minute spell (any time but mainly daytime) that equates to 5020.8 people doing nothing in an 8 hour period. Forgive me if I seem a little too simplistic but even if you half the number 2510.4 is much to many. Take into consideration that &#8220;anything can be moved from one place to another as many times as you like and you will not add a penny value to it. surely the largest single saving can be made in hospital efficiency just pouring tax payers £ in will do nothing to improve the situation, in fact all it is paralleled to is government spending on Quangos.<br />
<strong>weallmustvote</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>The latest results (from people with white coats n everything) will only add to your concerns.  Lord Professor Baron Robertstache Winistroni sat in a lift for an hour and concluded that doctors and nurses spend the entire day just going up and down&#8230; up and down&#8230; up and down.  Seriously.  As soon as one of the fuckers got out at the top, another one would get straight back in and go all the way down again!  I mean.  What the actual fuck are they playing at?  Even more worryingly, a squad of crack boffins (from the Smethwick Rolfe Street branch of Greggs) spent all day sat in the bog and concluded that around 15% of NHS staff are doing a poo!  And the other 85% are pissing like horses!  I&#8217;m going to keep a close eye on my doctor next time I see him, that&#8217;s for sure.  You can keep your poo-hands where I can see them, Mr Shitty.</p>
<p>Anyway. Thanks for your contribution to this very important science result.   This is how progress is made.  Sometimes, it takes a true visionary to ask questions so obvious that nobody else bothered.  Questions like &#8220;What happens in corridors?&#8221; and &#8220;Has anybody on the bus seen my shoe?&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/06/14/2510-4-is-much-too-many/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Twat Test</title>
		<link>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/05/28/the-twat-test/</link>
		<comments>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/05/28/the-twat-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 08:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dizzy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Racists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shit Sherlocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/?p=5301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wondered if you&#8217;re a bastard? Ever wondered if, when you leave the room, people call you a twat behind your back? 
Well, fate has now designed a simple test &#8211; the asylum seekers freezing to death in a truck test.
Remember, your responses will be weighted against those of normal, reasonable people with at least [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever wondered if you&#8217;re a bastard? Ever wondered if, when you leave the room, people call you a twat behind your back? </p>
<p>Well, fate has now designed a simple test &#8211; the <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article7131348.ece">asylum seekers freezing to death in a truck test</a>.</p>
<p>Remember, your responses will be weighted against those of normal, reasonable people with at least three picograms of compassion.</p>
<blockquote><p>Should have requested asylum in France.<br />
<b>M x</b></p></blockquote>
<p>Oooh. So close, but sorry, <b>M x</b>, you failed. I gave you bonus points for not actually <i>saying</i> it&#8217;s their own fault, but I&#8217;m afraid that you lost them all again because you&#8217;re shit.</p>
<blockquote><p>So, the &#8220;migrants, thought to be Afghans&#8221; can speak &#8216;broken English&#8217;, competently use a mobile &#8216;phone and tell a heart-rending story about a child losing consciousness.</p>
<p>But, they don&#8217;t realise that a refrigerated truck gets cold. How strange.</p>
<p>No doubt &#8220;their lives will ALL be in danger&#8221; if deported. How unusual.<br />
<b>Bob Smyth</b></p></blockquote>
<p>Damn right.  In this massive, complicated web of deception they constructed in order to get into England and steal your wheelie-bin, they were smart enough to pull this &#8216;nearly freezing to death&#8217; stunt in <i>France</i> where the funeral costs are actually 8% lower.  They&#8217;re crafty little shits and no mistake.</p>
<blockquote><p>They are not immigrants they are economical migrants and should be called such if they where true asylum seekers then by law they should have claimed asylum in the first county they came too.</p>
<p>But wait the Uk is no where near there, it must be for the benefits the sooner we crack down and stop benefits to foreigners the better.</p>
<p>Where is the nasty Tory party Labour keeps going on about, will some one not rid us of this culture of giving everything away to foreigners and treating English people like scum?<br />
<b>Top Cat</b></p></blockquote>
<p>They certainly are economical migrants. You can&#8217;t get travel much cheaper than locking yourself in the back of a freezer truck, can you?</p>
<p>By the way, you all failed the test.  Your punishment is to be locked in the back of a refrigerated lorry and driven to a country where you barely speak the language or understand the culture. England, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/05/28/the-twat-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Air Crash Investigit</title>
		<link>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/05/25/air-crash-investigit/</link>
		<comments>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/05/25/air-crash-investigit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 09:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Delusions of Grandeur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grief Athletes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shit Sherlocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/?p=5262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Sophia for these (from the Daily Mail I think).
The last two major plane crashes (this one and Tripoli) have both involved early morning landings, and the Polish president was also killed in a morning (although not early) landing
Could there be a common denominator?
Maybe something the authorities should take a look at.
RIP to all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Sophia for these (from the Daily Mail I think).</p>
<blockquote><p>The last two major plane crashes (this one and Tripoli) have both involved early morning landings, and the Polish president was also killed in a morning (although not early) landing<br />
Could there be a common denominator?<br />
Maybe something the authorities should take a look at.</p>
<p>RIP to all that died.<br />
<strong>- Graham, Torrevieja Spain</strong>, 22/5/2010 11:28</p></blockquote>
<p>You probably all heard about that plane crash in India and, like me, your first instinct was to start investigating it immediately.  You most likely left yourself a message stuck to the fridge saying &#8220;<em>Remember to think <strong>very</strong> hard about what causes plane crashes</em>&#8220;.  You didn&#8217;t do anything about it though did you?  No.  But Graham did.  He was all over that shit while you lazy fuckers were sat there in your knickers, eating crumpets and swigging champagne.  Not only that, but he also found the time to send a brief message of support to the dead.  </p>
<p>Kind of puts your efforts in perspective doesn&#8217;t it?  Think on.</p>
<blockquote><p>why are there so many plane crashes these days?<br />
and i do hope they find survivors, its a shame to not see your loved ones again.<br />
<strong>- jack, scotland</strong>, 22/5/2010 12:28</p></blockquote>
<p>What do you mean &#8220;why&#8221;? Did you even read Graham&#8217;s report??? They&#8217;re caused by MORNINGS you prick.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right though, it <strong>is</strong> a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/05/25/air-crash-investigit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Large Islam Collider</title>
		<link>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/05/07/large-islam-collider/</link>
		<comments>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/05/07/large-islam-collider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 09:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Permanently Bewildered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shit Sherlocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/?p=5136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Aaron. Someone&#8217;s worked out gay rights and religious tolerance might somehow end up in conflict.
Yes, I can’t help thinking that the PC agenda may be self-limiting since homosexuals and Islamists must be on a collision course with each other.
That will be an interesting collision that could rip the Left apart as we know [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Aaron. Someone&#8217;s worked out gay rights and religious tolerance might somehow end up in conflict.</p>
<blockquote><p>Yes, I can’t help thinking that the PC agenda may be self-limiting since homosexuals and Islamists must be on a collision course with each other.</p>
<p>That will be an interesting collision that could rip the Left apart as we know it.</p>
<p>posted by <strong>reprobate</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>You wonder what reprobate thinks goes on here at PC Brigade Towers. Dreadlocked, bespectacled, computer experts, hunched over their machines, tapping oppressed minorities into complicated models to resolve their differences without offending any of them. Transvestite executives, sipping fairtrade organic differently-abled-accessible coffee over lengthy meetings about whether to use gays to undermine marriage so the Welsh can take over, or Marxism to undermine Britain so the Muslims can take over. Put-upon lesbian secretaries (male of course) trying to cram as many attacks on hardworking English families into their asylum-seeker bosses&#8217; already packed PC agendas. Sounds a nightmare.</p>
<p>If only reprobate knew our <em>real</em> agenda. Throw darts at pictures of white people and dick about on the internet all morning, have lunch, check facebook, do the opposite of whatever UKIP want then hit the pub around four. Quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/05/07/large-islam-collider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Difficult Second Series</title>
		<link>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/03/24/the-difficult-second-series/</link>
		<comments>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/03/24/the-difficult-second-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Delusions of Grandeur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plain Weird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-appointed Sages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shit Sherlocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Regular Twats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/?p=4886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Thompson, Ms. Tranter, nice to see you both again. Now I know Susman: Epidemiologist hasn&#8217;t had exactly the figures you were hoping for, but frankly I think it&#8217;s done better than any other programme in the 4:55am slot on BBC Cymru. Apart from the ones in Welsh.
But yes, I completely agree we need to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Thompson, Ms. Tranter, nice to see you both again. Now I know <a href="http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2009/01/22/susman-epidemiologist/">Susman: Epidemiologist</a> hasn&#8217;t had exactly the figures you were hoping for, but frankly I think it&#8217;s done better than any other programme in the 4:55am slot on BBC Cymru. Apart from the ones in Welsh.</p>
<p>But yes, I completely agree we need to kick things up a notch for the second series. So I&#8217;ve been working up some ideas for the new series with my writing partner <strong>Ed</strong>. Now, think about it: where would Morse be without his Lewis? Bodie without his Doyle? Tosh Lynes without his bottle of whisky in a brown paper bag? Taggart without his coffin? So I propose to give susman a crime-fighting partner all of his own. Let me show you a sample scene:</p>
<p><tt><br />
<em>DAY. EXT. The courtyard of a large church.</em></p>
<p><strong>susman</strong>: So here we are. My old nemesis, The Catholic Church. I've tried to reason with them, but they have bats... in the belfry. If I'm right.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Andy Kadir-Buxton</strong>: The last time the Catholic Church gave us a statstic, it was that 50,000 priests were pedophiles. If the ratio is the same in monks and nuns then there are four pedophiles per Church, and I would not send my child in with those odds. I informed INTERPOL that the Catholic Church hid it's pedophiles from the law by giving them a good written reference and dumped them on other Denomination Churches, as a result 40 pedophiles were brought to justice. The official Catholic Church response in the news headlines was: "We have been betrayed." And I thought that they would thank me for saving so many choir boys from a living Hell.<br />
As the Pope has now endorsed the vow of celibacy he has effectively admitted that he is not bothered by pedophiles.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>susman</strong>: You know, when those stuffed-shirt bootlickers upstairs at Epidemiology Squad said I needed a partner because I was too much of a loose cannon even though dammit I get results, I almost told them to take my badge and very small gun (for viruses). But you've shown me the error of my ways, Andy. Now I know we can beat the scourge of paedophilia... together.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Kadir-Buxton</strong>: Yes! Using the Buxton Handclap Method! Now, I've filled my super soaker with lemonade. Bags I deal with the nuns!<br />
</tt></p>
<p>Now, I know you haven&#8217;t greenlit the second series yet, but I think with such a powerful format reboot we could easily be looking at viewing figures on a par with <cite><em>Horne &amp; Corden</em></cite>. I know four insomniacs in Swansea who are <em>very</em> excited at the prospect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/2010/03/24/the-difficult-second-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
